Cargando…

The change of teeth color, whiteness variations and its psychosocial and self-perception effects when using low vs. high concentration bleaching gels: a one-year follow-up

BACKGROUND: Dental bleaching in traditional concentrations generates greater sensitivity. In this respect, new systems of lower concentration of hydrogen peroxide for tooth bleaching appeared, with color stability unknown over time. The aim of this study was to compare the change and stability of co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Estay, J., Angel, P., Bersezio, C., Tonetto, M., Jorquera, G., Peña, M., Fernández, E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7488418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32917192
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01244-x
_version_ 1783581685918466048
author Estay, J.
Angel, P.
Bersezio, C.
Tonetto, M.
Jorquera, G.
Peña, M.
Fernández, E.
author_facet Estay, J.
Angel, P.
Bersezio, C.
Tonetto, M.
Jorquera, G.
Peña, M.
Fernández, E.
author_sort Estay, J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Dental bleaching in traditional concentrations generates greater sensitivity. In this respect, new systems of lower concentration of hydrogen peroxide for tooth bleaching appeared, with color stability unknown over time. The aim of this study was to compare the change and stability of color with low-concentration (6%) hydrogen peroxide gel in an in-office bleaching setting relative to conventional 37.5% gel, including their effects on psychosocial and esthetic self-perception, after 1 year. METHODS: Patients (n = 25) were assessed at 12 months post bleaching treatment (whitening with 6% chemo-activated alkaline formula gel versus 37.5% traditional concentration gel). Color changes were measured objectively using total variation in color (ΔE), and subjectively using Vita Classical and Vita Bleached scale (ΔSGU) by calibrated evaluators (Kappa = 0.85). The Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire (PIDAQ) and Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) aesthetic questionnaires were used to measure the self-perception and the psychosocial impact of the bleaching protocols. RESULTS: The effect (ΔE) of 37.5% HP (8.37 ± 2.73) was significantly better than that of 6% HP (5.27 ± 2.53) in terms of color rebound after 1 year of follow-up. There were significant differences in psychosocial impact and esthetic self-perception measurements prior to bleaching versus one-year post-whitening time points; positive effects were maintained. CONCLUSIONS: Low concentration (6%) achieved effective bleaching with good stability after 1 year, accompanied by a positive psychosocial impact and enhanced self-perception at follow-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03217994 (before enrollment of the first participant). Data register: July 14, 2017.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7488418
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74884182020-09-16 The change of teeth color, whiteness variations and its psychosocial and self-perception effects when using low vs. high concentration bleaching gels: a one-year follow-up Estay, J. Angel, P. Bersezio, C. Tonetto, M. Jorquera, G. Peña, M. Fernández, E. BMC Oral Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Dental bleaching in traditional concentrations generates greater sensitivity. In this respect, new systems of lower concentration of hydrogen peroxide for tooth bleaching appeared, with color stability unknown over time. The aim of this study was to compare the change and stability of color with low-concentration (6%) hydrogen peroxide gel in an in-office bleaching setting relative to conventional 37.5% gel, including their effects on psychosocial and esthetic self-perception, after 1 year. METHODS: Patients (n = 25) were assessed at 12 months post bleaching treatment (whitening with 6% chemo-activated alkaline formula gel versus 37.5% traditional concentration gel). Color changes were measured objectively using total variation in color (ΔE), and subjectively using Vita Classical and Vita Bleached scale (ΔSGU) by calibrated evaluators (Kappa = 0.85). The Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire (PIDAQ) and Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) aesthetic questionnaires were used to measure the self-perception and the psychosocial impact of the bleaching protocols. RESULTS: The effect (ΔE) of 37.5% HP (8.37 ± 2.73) was significantly better than that of 6% HP (5.27 ± 2.53) in terms of color rebound after 1 year of follow-up. There were significant differences in psychosocial impact and esthetic self-perception measurements prior to bleaching versus one-year post-whitening time points; positive effects were maintained. CONCLUSIONS: Low concentration (6%) achieved effective bleaching with good stability after 1 year, accompanied by a positive psychosocial impact and enhanced self-perception at follow-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03217994 (before enrollment of the first participant). Data register: July 14, 2017. BioMed Central 2020-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7488418/ /pubmed/32917192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01244-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Estay, J.
Angel, P.
Bersezio, C.
Tonetto, M.
Jorquera, G.
Peña, M.
Fernández, E.
The change of teeth color, whiteness variations and its psychosocial and self-perception effects when using low vs. high concentration bleaching gels: a one-year follow-up
title The change of teeth color, whiteness variations and its psychosocial and self-perception effects when using low vs. high concentration bleaching gels: a one-year follow-up
title_full The change of teeth color, whiteness variations and its psychosocial and self-perception effects when using low vs. high concentration bleaching gels: a one-year follow-up
title_fullStr The change of teeth color, whiteness variations and its psychosocial and self-perception effects when using low vs. high concentration bleaching gels: a one-year follow-up
title_full_unstemmed The change of teeth color, whiteness variations and its psychosocial and self-perception effects when using low vs. high concentration bleaching gels: a one-year follow-up
title_short The change of teeth color, whiteness variations and its psychosocial and self-perception effects when using low vs. high concentration bleaching gels: a one-year follow-up
title_sort change of teeth color, whiteness variations and its psychosocial and self-perception effects when using low vs. high concentration bleaching gels: a one-year follow-up
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7488418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32917192
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01244-x
work_keys_str_mv AT estayj thechangeofteethcolorwhitenessvariationsanditspsychosocialandselfperceptioneffectswhenusinglowvshighconcentrationbleachinggelsaoneyearfollowup
AT angelp thechangeofteethcolorwhitenessvariationsanditspsychosocialandselfperceptioneffectswhenusinglowvshighconcentrationbleachinggelsaoneyearfollowup
AT bersezioc thechangeofteethcolorwhitenessvariationsanditspsychosocialandselfperceptioneffectswhenusinglowvshighconcentrationbleachinggelsaoneyearfollowup
AT tonettom thechangeofteethcolorwhitenessvariationsanditspsychosocialandselfperceptioneffectswhenusinglowvshighconcentrationbleachinggelsaoneyearfollowup
AT jorquerag thechangeofteethcolorwhitenessvariationsanditspsychosocialandselfperceptioneffectswhenusinglowvshighconcentrationbleachinggelsaoneyearfollowup
AT penam thechangeofteethcolorwhitenessvariationsanditspsychosocialandselfperceptioneffectswhenusinglowvshighconcentrationbleachinggelsaoneyearfollowup
AT fernandeze thechangeofteethcolorwhitenessvariationsanditspsychosocialandselfperceptioneffectswhenusinglowvshighconcentrationbleachinggelsaoneyearfollowup
AT estayj changeofteethcolorwhitenessvariationsanditspsychosocialandselfperceptioneffectswhenusinglowvshighconcentrationbleachinggelsaoneyearfollowup
AT angelp changeofteethcolorwhitenessvariationsanditspsychosocialandselfperceptioneffectswhenusinglowvshighconcentrationbleachinggelsaoneyearfollowup
AT bersezioc changeofteethcolorwhitenessvariationsanditspsychosocialandselfperceptioneffectswhenusinglowvshighconcentrationbleachinggelsaoneyearfollowup
AT tonettom changeofteethcolorwhitenessvariationsanditspsychosocialandselfperceptioneffectswhenusinglowvshighconcentrationbleachinggelsaoneyearfollowup
AT jorquerag changeofteethcolorwhitenessvariationsanditspsychosocialandselfperceptioneffectswhenusinglowvshighconcentrationbleachinggelsaoneyearfollowup
AT penam changeofteethcolorwhitenessvariationsanditspsychosocialandselfperceptioneffectswhenusinglowvshighconcentrationbleachinggelsaoneyearfollowup
AT fernandeze changeofteethcolorwhitenessvariationsanditspsychosocialandselfperceptioneffectswhenusinglowvshighconcentrationbleachinggelsaoneyearfollowup