Cargando…

Users with spinal cord injury experience of robotic Locomotor exoskeletons: a qualitative study of the benefits, limitations, and recommendations

BACKGROUND: Persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) may experience both psychological and physiological benefits from robotic locomotor exoskeleton use, and knowledgeable users may have valuable perspectives to inform future development. The objective of this study is to gain insight into the experien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kinnett-Hopkins, Dominique, Mummidisetty, Chaithanya K., Ehrlich-Jones, Linda, Crown, Deborah, Bond, Rachel A., Applebaum, Marc H., Jayaraman, Arun, Furbish, Catherine, Forrest, Gail, Field-Fote, Edelle, Heinemann, Allen W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7488437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32917287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-020-00752-9
_version_ 1783581690155761664
author Kinnett-Hopkins, Dominique
Mummidisetty, Chaithanya K.
Ehrlich-Jones, Linda
Crown, Deborah
Bond, Rachel A.
Applebaum, Marc H.
Jayaraman, Arun
Furbish, Catherine
Forrest, Gail
Field-Fote, Edelle
Heinemann, Allen W.
author_facet Kinnett-Hopkins, Dominique
Mummidisetty, Chaithanya K.
Ehrlich-Jones, Linda
Crown, Deborah
Bond, Rachel A.
Applebaum, Marc H.
Jayaraman, Arun
Furbish, Catherine
Forrest, Gail
Field-Fote, Edelle
Heinemann, Allen W.
author_sort Kinnett-Hopkins, Dominique
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) may experience both psychological and physiological benefits from robotic locomotor exoskeleton use, and knowledgeable users may have valuable perspectives to inform future development. The objective of this study is to gain insight into the experiences, perspectives, concerns, and suggestions on the use of robotic locomotor exoskeletons by civilians and veterans living with SCI. METHODS: Participants reported their demographic characteristics and the extent of robotic exoskeleton use in an online survey. Then, 28 experienced robotic locomotor exoskeleton users participated in focus groups held at three regional hospitals that specialize in rehabilitation for persons with SCI. We used a qualitative description approach analysis to analyze the data, and included thematic analysis. RESULTS: Participants expressed that robotic exoskeletons were useful in therapy settings but, in their current form, were not practical for activities of daily living due to device limitations. Participants detailed the psychological benefits of being eye-level with their non-disabled peers and family members, and some reported physiologic improvements in areas such as bowel and bladder function. Participants detailed barriers of increased fatigue, spasticity, and spasms and expressed dissatisfaction with the devices due to an inability to use them independently and safely. Participants provided suggestions to manufacturers for technology improvements. CONCLUSIONS: The varied opinions and insights of robotic locomotor exoskeletons users with SCI add to our knowledge of device benefits and limitations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7488437
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74884372020-09-16 Users with spinal cord injury experience of robotic Locomotor exoskeletons: a qualitative study of the benefits, limitations, and recommendations Kinnett-Hopkins, Dominique Mummidisetty, Chaithanya K. Ehrlich-Jones, Linda Crown, Deborah Bond, Rachel A. Applebaum, Marc H. Jayaraman, Arun Furbish, Catherine Forrest, Gail Field-Fote, Edelle Heinemann, Allen W. J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: Persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) may experience both psychological and physiological benefits from robotic locomotor exoskeleton use, and knowledgeable users may have valuable perspectives to inform future development. The objective of this study is to gain insight into the experiences, perspectives, concerns, and suggestions on the use of robotic locomotor exoskeletons by civilians and veterans living with SCI. METHODS: Participants reported their demographic characteristics and the extent of robotic exoskeleton use in an online survey. Then, 28 experienced robotic locomotor exoskeleton users participated in focus groups held at three regional hospitals that specialize in rehabilitation for persons with SCI. We used a qualitative description approach analysis to analyze the data, and included thematic analysis. RESULTS: Participants expressed that robotic exoskeletons were useful in therapy settings but, in their current form, were not practical for activities of daily living due to device limitations. Participants detailed the psychological benefits of being eye-level with their non-disabled peers and family members, and some reported physiologic improvements in areas such as bowel and bladder function. Participants detailed barriers of increased fatigue, spasticity, and spasms and expressed dissatisfaction with the devices due to an inability to use them independently and safely. Participants provided suggestions to manufacturers for technology improvements. CONCLUSIONS: The varied opinions and insights of robotic locomotor exoskeletons users with SCI add to our knowledge of device benefits and limitations. BioMed Central 2020-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7488437/ /pubmed/32917287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-020-00752-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Kinnett-Hopkins, Dominique
Mummidisetty, Chaithanya K.
Ehrlich-Jones, Linda
Crown, Deborah
Bond, Rachel A.
Applebaum, Marc H.
Jayaraman, Arun
Furbish, Catherine
Forrest, Gail
Field-Fote, Edelle
Heinemann, Allen W.
Users with spinal cord injury experience of robotic Locomotor exoskeletons: a qualitative study of the benefits, limitations, and recommendations
title Users with spinal cord injury experience of robotic Locomotor exoskeletons: a qualitative study of the benefits, limitations, and recommendations
title_full Users with spinal cord injury experience of robotic Locomotor exoskeletons: a qualitative study of the benefits, limitations, and recommendations
title_fullStr Users with spinal cord injury experience of robotic Locomotor exoskeletons: a qualitative study of the benefits, limitations, and recommendations
title_full_unstemmed Users with spinal cord injury experience of robotic Locomotor exoskeletons: a qualitative study of the benefits, limitations, and recommendations
title_short Users with spinal cord injury experience of robotic Locomotor exoskeletons: a qualitative study of the benefits, limitations, and recommendations
title_sort users with spinal cord injury experience of robotic locomotor exoskeletons: a qualitative study of the benefits, limitations, and recommendations
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7488437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32917287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-020-00752-9
work_keys_str_mv AT kinnetthopkinsdominique userswithspinalcordinjuryexperienceofroboticlocomotorexoskeletonsaqualitativestudyofthebenefitslimitationsandrecommendations
AT mummidisettychaithanyak userswithspinalcordinjuryexperienceofroboticlocomotorexoskeletonsaqualitativestudyofthebenefitslimitationsandrecommendations
AT ehrlichjoneslinda userswithspinalcordinjuryexperienceofroboticlocomotorexoskeletonsaqualitativestudyofthebenefitslimitationsandrecommendations
AT crowndeborah userswithspinalcordinjuryexperienceofroboticlocomotorexoskeletonsaqualitativestudyofthebenefitslimitationsandrecommendations
AT bondrachela userswithspinalcordinjuryexperienceofroboticlocomotorexoskeletonsaqualitativestudyofthebenefitslimitationsandrecommendations
AT applebaummarch userswithspinalcordinjuryexperienceofroboticlocomotorexoskeletonsaqualitativestudyofthebenefitslimitationsandrecommendations
AT jayaramanarun userswithspinalcordinjuryexperienceofroboticlocomotorexoskeletonsaqualitativestudyofthebenefitslimitationsandrecommendations
AT furbishcatherine userswithspinalcordinjuryexperienceofroboticlocomotorexoskeletonsaqualitativestudyofthebenefitslimitationsandrecommendations
AT forrestgail userswithspinalcordinjuryexperienceofroboticlocomotorexoskeletonsaqualitativestudyofthebenefitslimitationsandrecommendations
AT fieldfoteedelle userswithspinalcordinjuryexperienceofroboticlocomotorexoskeletonsaqualitativestudyofthebenefitslimitationsandrecommendations
AT heinemannallenw userswithspinalcordinjuryexperienceofroboticlocomotorexoskeletonsaqualitativestudyofthebenefitslimitationsandrecommendations