Cargando…
Users with spinal cord injury experience of robotic Locomotor exoskeletons: a qualitative study of the benefits, limitations, and recommendations
BACKGROUND: Persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) may experience both psychological and physiological benefits from robotic locomotor exoskeleton use, and knowledgeable users may have valuable perspectives to inform future development. The objective of this study is to gain insight into the experien...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7488437/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32917287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-020-00752-9 |
_version_ | 1783581690155761664 |
---|---|
author | Kinnett-Hopkins, Dominique Mummidisetty, Chaithanya K. Ehrlich-Jones, Linda Crown, Deborah Bond, Rachel A. Applebaum, Marc H. Jayaraman, Arun Furbish, Catherine Forrest, Gail Field-Fote, Edelle Heinemann, Allen W. |
author_facet | Kinnett-Hopkins, Dominique Mummidisetty, Chaithanya K. Ehrlich-Jones, Linda Crown, Deborah Bond, Rachel A. Applebaum, Marc H. Jayaraman, Arun Furbish, Catherine Forrest, Gail Field-Fote, Edelle Heinemann, Allen W. |
author_sort | Kinnett-Hopkins, Dominique |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) may experience both psychological and physiological benefits from robotic locomotor exoskeleton use, and knowledgeable users may have valuable perspectives to inform future development. The objective of this study is to gain insight into the experiences, perspectives, concerns, and suggestions on the use of robotic locomotor exoskeletons by civilians and veterans living with SCI. METHODS: Participants reported their demographic characteristics and the extent of robotic exoskeleton use in an online survey. Then, 28 experienced robotic locomotor exoskeleton users participated in focus groups held at three regional hospitals that specialize in rehabilitation for persons with SCI. We used a qualitative description approach analysis to analyze the data, and included thematic analysis. RESULTS: Participants expressed that robotic exoskeletons were useful in therapy settings but, in their current form, were not practical for activities of daily living due to device limitations. Participants detailed the psychological benefits of being eye-level with their non-disabled peers and family members, and some reported physiologic improvements in areas such as bowel and bladder function. Participants detailed barriers of increased fatigue, spasticity, and spasms and expressed dissatisfaction with the devices due to an inability to use them independently and safely. Participants provided suggestions to manufacturers for technology improvements. CONCLUSIONS: The varied opinions and insights of robotic locomotor exoskeletons users with SCI add to our knowledge of device benefits and limitations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7488437 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74884372020-09-16 Users with spinal cord injury experience of robotic Locomotor exoskeletons: a qualitative study of the benefits, limitations, and recommendations Kinnett-Hopkins, Dominique Mummidisetty, Chaithanya K. Ehrlich-Jones, Linda Crown, Deborah Bond, Rachel A. Applebaum, Marc H. Jayaraman, Arun Furbish, Catherine Forrest, Gail Field-Fote, Edelle Heinemann, Allen W. J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: Persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) may experience both psychological and physiological benefits from robotic locomotor exoskeleton use, and knowledgeable users may have valuable perspectives to inform future development. The objective of this study is to gain insight into the experiences, perspectives, concerns, and suggestions on the use of robotic locomotor exoskeletons by civilians and veterans living with SCI. METHODS: Participants reported their demographic characteristics and the extent of robotic exoskeleton use in an online survey. Then, 28 experienced robotic locomotor exoskeleton users participated in focus groups held at three regional hospitals that specialize in rehabilitation for persons with SCI. We used a qualitative description approach analysis to analyze the data, and included thematic analysis. RESULTS: Participants expressed that robotic exoskeletons were useful in therapy settings but, in their current form, were not practical for activities of daily living due to device limitations. Participants detailed the psychological benefits of being eye-level with their non-disabled peers and family members, and some reported physiologic improvements in areas such as bowel and bladder function. Participants detailed barriers of increased fatigue, spasticity, and spasms and expressed dissatisfaction with the devices due to an inability to use them independently and safely. Participants provided suggestions to manufacturers for technology improvements. CONCLUSIONS: The varied opinions and insights of robotic locomotor exoskeletons users with SCI add to our knowledge of device benefits and limitations. BioMed Central 2020-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7488437/ /pubmed/32917287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-020-00752-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Kinnett-Hopkins, Dominique Mummidisetty, Chaithanya K. Ehrlich-Jones, Linda Crown, Deborah Bond, Rachel A. Applebaum, Marc H. Jayaraman, Arun Furbish, Catherine Forrest, Gail Field-Fote, Edelle Heinemann, Allen W. Users with spinal cord injury experience of robotic Locomotor exoskeletons: a qualitative study of the benefits, limitations, and recommendations |
title | Users with spinal cord injury experience of robotic Locomotor exoskeletons: a qualitative study of the benefits, limitations, and recommendations |
title_full | Users with spinal cord injury experience of robotic Locomotor exoskeletons: a qualitative study of the benefits, limitations, and recommendations |
title_fullStr | Users with spinal cord injury experience of robotic Locomotor exoskeletons: a qualitative study of the benefits, limitations, and recommendations |
title_full_unstemmed | Users with spinal cord injury experience of robotic Locomotor exoskeletons: a qualitative study of the benefits, limitations, and recommendations |
title_short | Users with spinal cord injury experience of robotic Locomotor exoskeletons: a qualitative study of the benefits, limitations, and recommendations |
title_sort | users with spinal cord injury experience of robotic locomotor exoskeletons: a qualitative study of the benefits, limitations, and recommendations |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7488437/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32917287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-020-00752-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kinnetthopkinsdominique userswithspinalcordinjuryexperienceofroboticlocomotorexoskeletonsaqualitativestudyofthebenefitslimitationsandrecommendations AT mummidisettychaithanyak userswithspinalcordinjuryexperienceofroboticlocomotorexoskeletonsaqualitativestudyofthebenefitslimitationsandrecommendations AT ehrlichjoneslinda userswithspinalcordinjuryexperienceofroboticlocomotorexoskeletonsaqualitativestudyofthebenefitslimitationsandrecommendations AT crowndeborah userswithspinalcordinjuryexperienceofroboticlocomotorexoskeletonsaqualitativestudyofthebenefitslimitationsandrecommendations AT bondrachela userswithspinalcordinjuryexperienceofroboticlocomotorexoskeletonsaqualitativestudyofthebenefitslimitationsandrecommendations AT applebaummarch userswithspinalcordinjuryexperienceofroboticlocomotorexoskeletonsaqualitativestudyofthebenefitslimitationsandrecommendations AT jayaramanarun userswithspinalcordinjuryexperienceofroboticlocomotorexoskeletonsaqualitativestudyofthebenefitslimitationsandrecommendations AT furbishcatherine userswithspinalcordinjuryexperienceofroboticlocomotorexoskeletonsaqualitativestudyofthebenefitslimitationsandrecommendations AT forrestgail userswithspinalcordinjuryexperienceofroboticlocomotorexoskeletonsaqualitativestudyofthebenefitslimitationsandrecommendations AT fieldfoteedelle userswithspinalcordinjuryexperienceofroboticlocomotorexoskeletonsaqualitativestudyofthebenefitslimitationsandrecommendations AT heinemannallenw userswithspinalcordinjuryexperienceofroboticlocomotorexoskeletonsaqualitativestudyofthebenefitslimitationsandrecommendations |