Cargando…

Well-being in high-risk pregnancy: an integrative review

BACKGROUND: A prerequisite to the interventions for well-being improvement in high-risk pregnancy (HRP) is to make the concept clear, objective, and measurable. Despite the wealth of studies into the concept of well-being in HRP, there is no clear definition for it. This study aimed to explore the c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mirzakhani, Kobra, Ebadi, Abbas, Faridhosseini, Farhad, Khadivzadeh, Talaat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7488451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32912254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03190-6
_version_ 1783581693444096000
author Mirzakhani, Kobra
Ebadi, Abbas
Faridhosseini, Farhad
Khadivzadeh, Talaat
author_facet Mirzakhani, Kobra
Ebadi, Abbas
Faridhosseini, Farhad
Khadivzadeh, Talaat
author_sort Mirzakhani, Kobra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A prerequisite to the interventions for well-being improvement in high-risk pregnancy (HRP) is to make the concept clear, objective, and measurable. Despite the wealth of studies into the concept of well-being in HRP, there is no clear definition for it. This study aimed to explore the concept of well-being in HRP. METHODS: This integrative review was conducted using the Whittemore and Knafl’s approach. A literature search was done without any data limitation in dictionaries, thesauruses, encyclopedias, well-being-related textbooks, midwifery, psychology, and mental health journals, and Iranian and international databases. The most primary inclusion criterion was relevance to well-being in HRP. The full-texts of all these articles were assessed using the checklists of the Joanna Briggs Institute. Data were analyzed through the constant comparison method and were managed using the MAXQDA 10 software. Meaning units were identified and coded. The codes were grouped into subcategories and categories according to the attributes, antecedents, and consequences of well-being in HRP. RESULTS: Thirty articles were included in the review, from which 540 codes were extracted. The codes were grouped into seven main attributes, eight main antecedents, and five main consequences of well-being in HRP. The four unique dimensions of well-being in HRP are physical, mental-emotional, social, and spiritual well-being. These dimensions differentiate well-being in HRP from well-being in low-risk pregnancy and in non-pregnancy conditions. CONCLUSION: As a complex and multidimensional concept, well-being in HRP refers to the pregnant woman’s evaluation of her life during HRP. It includes physical, hedonic, and eudaimonic components. The assessment of well-being in HRP should include all these components.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7488451
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74884512020-09-16 Well-being in high-risk pregnancy: an integrative review Mirzakhani, Kobra Ebadi, Abbas Faridhosseini, Farhad Khadivzadeh, Talaat BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: A prerequisite to the interventions for well-being improvement in high-risk pregnancy (HRP) is to make the concept clear, objective, and measurable. Despite the wealth of studies into the concept of well-being in HRP, there is no clear definition for it. This study aimed to explore the concept of well-being in HRP. METHODS: This integrative review was conducted using the Whittemore and Knafl’s approach. A literature search was done without any data limitation in dictionaries, thesauruses, encyclopedias, well-being-related textbooks, midwifery, psychology, and mental health journals, and Iranian and international databases. The most primary inclusion criterion was relevance to well-being in HRP. The full-texts of all these articles were assessed using the checklists of the Joanna Briggs Institute. Data were analyzed through the constant comparison method and were managed using the MAXQDA 10 software. Meaning units were identified and coded. The codes were grouped into subcategories and categories according to the attributes, antecedents, and consequences of well-being in HRP. RESULTS: Thirty articles were included in the review, from which 540 codes were extracted. The codes were grouped into seven main attributes, eight main antecedents, and five main consequences of well-being in HRP. The four unique dimensions of well-being in HRP are physical, mental-emotional, social, and spiritual well-being. These dimensions differentiate well-being in HRP from well-being in low-risk pregnancy and in non-pregnancy conditions. CONCLUSION: As a complex and multidimensional concept, well-being in HRP refers to the pregnant woman’s evaluation of her life during HRP. It includes physical, hedonic, and eudaimonic components. The assessment of well-being in HRP should include all these components. BioMed Central 2020-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7488451/ /pubmed/32912254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03190-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mirzakhani, Kobra
Ebadi, Abbas
Faridhosseini, Farhad
Khadivzadeh, Talaat
Well-being in high-risk pregnancy: an integrative review
title Well-being in high-risk pregnancy: an integrative review
title_full Well-being in high-risk pregnancy: an integrative review
title_fullStr Well-being in high-risk pregnancy: an integrative review
title_full_unstemmed Well-being in high-risk pregnancy: an integrative review
title_short Well-being in high-risk pregnancy: an integrative review
title_sort well-being in high-risk pregnancy: an integrative review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7488451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32912254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03190-6
work_keys_str_mv AT mirzakhanikobra wellbeinginhighriskpregnancyanintegrativereview
AT ebadiabbas wellbeinginhighriskpregnancyanintegrativereview
AT faridhosseinifarhad wellbeinginhighriskpregnancyanintegrativereview
AT khadivzadehtalaat wellbeinginhighriskpregnancyanintegrativereview