Cargando…
Time to adapt in the pandemic era: a prospective randomized non –inferiority study comparing time to intubate with and without the barrier box
BACKGROUND: The challenges posed by the spread of COVID-19 disease through aerosols have compelled anesthesiologists to modify their airway management practices. Devices such as barrier boxes are being considered as potential adjuncts to full PPE’s to limit the aerosol spread. Usage of the barrier b...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7488639/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32928122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-01149-w |
_version_ | 1783581733797494784 |
---|---|
author | Madabhushi, Praneeth Kinthala, Sudhakar Ankam, Abistanand Chopra, Nitin Porter, Burdett R. |
author_facet | Madabhushi, Praneeth Kinthala, Sudhakar Ankam, Abistanand Chopra, Nitin Porter, Burdett R. |
author_sort | Madabhushi, Praneeth |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The challenges posed by the spread of COVID-19 disease through aerosols have compelled anesthesiologists to modify their airway management practices. Devices such as barrier boxes are being considered as potential adjuncts to full PPE’s to limit the aerosol spread. Usage of the barrier box raises concerns of delay in time to intubate (TTI). We designed our study to determine if using a barrier box with glidescope delays TTI within acceptable parameters to make relevant clinical conclusions. METHODS: Seventy-eight patients were enrolled in this prospective non-inferiority controlled trial and were randomly allocated to either group C (without the barrier box) or the study group BB (using barrier box). The primary measured endpoint is time to intubate (TTI), which is defined as time taken from loss of twitches confirmed with a peripheral nerve stimulator to confirmation of end-tidal CO (2.) 15 s was used as non-inferiority margin for the purpose of the study. We used an unpaired two-sample single-sided t-test to test our non- inferiority hypothesis (H (0): Mean TTI diff ≥15 s, H (A): Mean TTI diff < 15 s). Secondary endpoints include the number of attempts at intubation, lowest oxygen saturation during induction, and the need for bag-mask ventilation. RESULTS: Mean TTI in group C was 42 s (CI 19.2 to 64.8) vs. 52.1 s (CI 26.1 to 78) in group BB. The difference in mean TTI was 10.1 s (CI -∞ to 14.9). We rejected the null hypothesis and concluded with 95% confidence that the difference of the mean TTI between the groups is less than < 15 s (95% CI -∞ to 14.9,p = 0.0461). Our induction times were comparable (67.7 vs. 65.9 s).100% of our patients were intubated on the first attempt in both groups. None of our patients needed rescue breaths. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that in patients with normal airway exam, scheduled for elective surgeries, our barrier box did not cause any clinically significant delay in TTI when airway manipulation is performed by well-trained providers. The study was retrospectively registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04411056) on May 27, 2020. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7488639 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74886392020-09-15 Time to adapt in the pandemic era: a prospective randomized non –inferiority study comparing time to intubate with and without the barrier box Madabhushi, Praneeth Kinthala, Sudhakar Ankam, Abistanand Chopra, Nitin Porter, Burdett R. BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: The challenges posed by the spread of COVID-19 disease through aerosols have compelled anesthesiologists to modify their airway management practices. Devices such as barrier boxes are being considered as potential adjuncts to full PPE’s to limit the aerosol spread. Usage of the barrier box raises concerns of delay in time to intubate (TTI). We designed our study to determine if using a barrier box with glidescope delays TTI within acceptable parameters to make relevant clinical conclusions. METHODS: Seventy-eight patients were enrolled in this prospective non-inferiority controlled trial and were randomly allocated to either group C (without the barrier box) or the study group BB (using barrier box). The primary measured endpoint is time to intubate (TTI), which is defined as time taken from loss of twitches confirmed with a peripheral nerve stimulator to confirmation of end-tidal CO (2.) 15 s was used as non-inferiority margin for the purpose of the study. We used an unpaired two-sample single-sided t-test to test our non- inferiority hypothesis (H (0): Mean TTI diff ≥15 s, H (A): Mean TTI diff < 15 s). Secondary endpoints include the number of attempts at intubation, lowest oxygen saturation during induction, and the need for bag-mask ventilation. RESULTS: Mean TTI in group C was 42 s (CI 19.2 to 64.8) vs. 52.1 s (CI 26.1 to 78) in group BB. The difference in mean TTI was 10.1 s (CI -∞ to 14.9). We rejected the null hypothesis and concluded with 95% confidence that the difference of the mean TTI between the groups is less than < 15 s (95% CI -∞ to 14.9,p = 0.0461). Our induction times were comparable (67.7 vs. 65.9 s).100% of our patients were intubated on the first attempt in both groups. None of our patients needed rescue breaths. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that in patients with normal airway exam, scheduled for elective surgeries, our barrier box did not cause any clinically significant delay in TTI when airway manipulation is performed by well-trained providers. The study was retrospectively registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04411056) on May 27, 2020. BioMed Central 2020-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7488639/ /pubmed/32928122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-01149-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Madabhushi, Praneeth Kinthala, Sudhakar Ankam, Abistanand Chopra, Nitin Porter, Burdett R. Time to adapt in the pandemic era: a prospective randomized non –inferiority study comparing time to intubate with and without the barrier box |
title | Time to adapt in the pandemic era: a prospective randomized non –inferiority study comparing time to intubate with and without the barrier box |
title_full | Time to adapt in the pandemic era: a prospective randomized non –inferiority study comparing time to intubate with and without the barrier box |
title_fullStr | Time to adapt in the pandemic era: a prospective randomized non –inferiority study comparing time to intubate with and without the barrier box |
title_full_unstemmed | Time to adapt in the pandemic era: a prospective randomized non –inferiority study comparing time to intubate with and without the barrier box |
title_short | Time to adapt in the pandemic era: a prospective randomized non –inferiority study comparing time to intubate with and without the barrier box |
title_sort | time to adapt in the pandemic era: a prospective randomized non –inferiority study comparing time to intubate with and without the barrier box |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7488639/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32928122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-01149-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT madabhushipraneeth timetoadaptinthepandemiceraaprospectiverandomizednoninferioritystudycomparingtimetointubatewithandwithoutthebarrierbox AT kinthalasudhakar timetoadaptinthepandemiceraaprospectiverandomizednoninferioritystudycomparingtimetointubatewithandwithoutthebarrierbox AT ankamabistanand timetoadaptinthepandemiceraaprospectiverandomizednoninferioritystudycomparingtimetointubatewithandwithoutthebarrierbox AT chopranitin timetoadaptinthepandemiceraaprospectiverandomizednoninferioritystudycomparingtimetointubatewithandwithoutthebarrierbox AT porterburdettr timetoadaptinthepandemiceraaprospectiverandomizednoninferioritystudycomparingtimetointubatewithandwithoutthebarrierbox |