Cargando…

Positioning work related stress – GPs’ reasoning about using the WSQ combined with feedback at consultation

BACKGROUND: General practitioners (GPs) regularly handle cases related to stress and work capacity, but often find this work difficult. However, using an assessment tool in a structured way can increase GPs’ awareness of the risk for sick leave and need of referrals to preventive measures. Today the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hultén, Anna-Maria, Dahlin-Ivanoff, Synneve, Holmgren, Kristina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7488670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32917138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-020-01258-y
_version_ 1783581741042106368
author Hultén, Anna-Maria
Dahlin-Ivanoff, Synneve
Holmgren, Kristina
author_facet Hultén, Anna-Maria
Dahlin-Ivanoff, Synneve
Holmgren, Kristina
author_sort Hultén, Anna-Maria
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: General practitioners (GPs) regularly handle cases related to stress and work capacity, but often find this work difficult. However, using an assessment tool in a structured way can increase GPs’ awareness of the risk for sick leave and need of referrals to preventive measures. Today there is no established methodical practice for this in primary health care. The aim of this study was to explore GPs’ reasoning about using the Work Stress Questionnaire combined with feedback at consultation as an early intervention to reduce sick leave. METHODS: A focus group study was performed with 23 GPs at six primary health care centres. The discussions were analysed based on a method by Krueger. RESULTS: Three themes emerged. Positioning work-related stress describes the need to make fundamental standpoints on stress and how it should be handled, to make sense of their work concerning work-related stress. Making use of resources focuses on GPs performing to the best of their ability using assigned resources to treat patients with stress-related ill health, even if the resources were perceived as insufficient. Practising daily work focuses on the GPs’ regular and preferred way of working set against the degree of intrusion and benefits. The two related themes making use of resources and practising daily work were mirrored through the third theme, positioning work-related stress, to form an understanding of how GPs should work with patients perceiving work-related stress. CONCLUSIONS: The GPs own competence and tools, those of other professionals and the time allocated were seen as important when treating patients perceiving ill health due to work-related stress. When resources were insufficient though, the GPs questioned their responsibility for these patients. The results also indicate that the GPs viewed their ordinary consultative way of working as sufficient to identify these patients. The intervention was therefore not seen as useful for early treatment of patients at risk of sick leave due to work-related stress. However, prevention is an important part of the PHC’s responsibility, and strategies concerning stress-related ill health therefore need to be more thoroughly formulated and incorporated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02480855. Registered 20 May 2015.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7488670
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74886702020-09-16 Positioning work related stress – GPs’ reasoning about using the WSQ combined with feedback at consultation Hultén, Anna-Maria Dahlin-Ivanoff, Synneve Holmgren, Kristina BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: General practitioners (GPs) regularly handle cases related to stress and work capacity, but often find this work difficult. However, using an assessment tool in a structured way can increase GPs’ awareness of the risk for sick leave and need of referrals to preventive measures. Today there is no established methodical practice for this in primary health care. The aim of this study was to explore GPs’ reasoning about using the Work Stress Questionnaire combined with feedback at consultation as an early intervention to reduce sick leave. METHODS: A focus group study was performed with 23 GPs at six primary health care centres. The discussions were analysed based on a method by Krueger. RESULTS: Three themes emerged. Positioning work-related stress describes the need to make fundamental standpoints on stress and how it should be handled, to make sense of their work concerning work-related stress. Making use of resources focuses on GPs performing to the best of their ability using assigned resources to treat patients with stress-related ill health, even if the resources were perceived as insufficient. Practising daily work focuses on the GPs’ regular and preferred way of working set against the degree of intrusion and benefits. The two related themes making use of resources and practising daily work were mirrored through the third theme, positioning work-related stress, to form an understanding of how GPs should work with patients perceiving work-related stress. CONCLUSIONS: The GPs own competence and tools, those of other professionals and the time allocated were seen as important when treating patients perceiving ill health due to work-related stress. When resources were insufficient though, the GPs questioned their responsibility for these patients. The results also indicate that the GPs viewed their ordinary consultative way of working as sufficient to identify these patients. The intervention was therefore not seen as useful for early treatment of patients at risk of sick leave due to work-related stress. However, prevention is an important part of the PHC’s responsibility, and strategies concerning stress-related ill health therefore need to be more thoroughly formulated and incorporated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02480855. Registered 20 May 2015. BioMed Central 2020-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7488670/ /pubmed/32917138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-020-01258-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hultén, Anna-Maria
Dahlin-Ivanoff, Synneve
Holmgren, Kristina
Positioning work related stress – GPs’ reasoning about using the WSQ combined with feedback at consultation
title Positioning work related stress – GPs’ reasoning about using the WSQ combined with feedback at consultation
title_full Positioning work related stress – GPs’ reasoning about using the WSQ combined with feedback at consultation
title_fullStr Positioning work related stress – GPs’ reasoning about using the WSQ combined with feedback at consultation
title_full_unstemmed Positioning work related stress – GPs’ reasoning about using the WSQ combined with feedback at consultation
title_short Positioning work related stress – GPs’ reasoning about using the WSQ combined with feedback at consultation
title_sort positioning work related stress – gps’ reasoning about using the wsq combined with feedback at consultation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7488670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32917138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-020-01258-y
work_keys_str_mv AT hultenannamaria positioningworkrelatedstressgpsreasoningaboutusingthewsqcombinedwithfeedbackatconsultation
AT dahlinivanoffsynneve positioningworkrelatedstressgpsreasoningaboutusingthewsqcombinedwithfeedbackatconsultation
AT holmgrenkristina positioningworkrelatedstressgpsreasoningaboutusingthewsqcombinedwithfeedbackatconsultation