Cargando…

Systematic review of infant and young child feeding practices in conflict areas: what the evidence advocates

BACKGROUND: Breast feeding in conflict settings is known to be the safest way to protect infant and young children from malnourishment and increased risk of infections. This systematic review assesses the evidence on infant and young child feeding (IYCF) practices in conflict settings. METHODOLOGY:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rabbani, Amna, Padhani, Zahra A, A Siddiqui, Faareha, Das, Jai K, Bhutta, Zulfiqar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7488834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32928852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036757
_version_ 1783581774163476480
author Rabbani, Amna
Padhani, Zahra A
A Siddiqui, Faareha
Das, Jai K
Bhutta, Zulfiqar
author_facet Rabbani, Amna
Padhani, Zahra A
A Siddiqui, Faareha
Das, Jai K
Bhutta, Zulfiqar
author_sort Rabbani, Amna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Breast feeding in conflict settings is known to be the safest way to protect infant and young children from malnourishment and increased risk of infections. This systematic review assesses the evidence on infant and young child feeding (IYCF) practices in conflict settings. METHODOLOGY: We conducted a search in PubMed and CENTRAL and also searched for grey literature from the year 1980 to August 2019. We included studies conducted in settings inflicted with armed conflict; which comprised settings undergoing conflict, as well as, those within 5 years of its cessation. Studies were included if they discussed IYCF practices, barriers, programmes and guidelines to promote and improve IYCF practices. Two review authors independently evaluated and screened studies for eligibility and extracted data; followed by a descriptive and thematic analysis. RESULTS: We included 56 studies in our review including 11 published articles and 45 reports from grey literature and broadly classified into four predetermined sections: epidemiology (n=24), barriers/enablers (n=18), programmes/interventions (n=15) and implementation guidelines (n=30). Epidemiological evidence shows that IYCF practices were generally poor in conflict settings with median prevalence of exclusive breast feeding at 25%, continued breast feeding at 29%, bottle feeding at 58.3%, introduction to solid, semisolid or soft foods at 71.1% and minimum dietary diversity at 60.3%. IYCF practices were affected by displacement, stress, maternal malnutrition and mental health, family casualties and free distribution of breast milk substitutes. To improve IYCF, several interventions were implemented; including, training of health workers, educating mothers, community networking and mobilisation, lactation-support service, baby friendly hospital initiative, mother–baby friendly spaces and support groups. CONCLUSION: The evidence suggests that IYCF practices are generally poor in conflict inflicted settings. However, there is potential for improvement by designing effective interventions, responsibly disseminating, monitoring and implementing IYCF guidelines as prescribed by WHO development partners, government and non-government organisations with dedicated funds and investing in capacity development.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7488834
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74888342020-09-25 Systematic review of infant and young child feeding practices in conflict areas: what the evidence advocates Rabbani, Amna Padhani, Zahra A A Siddiqui, Faareha Das, Jai K Bhutta, Zulfiqar BMJ Open Public Health BACKGROUND: Breast feeding in conflict settings is known to be the safest way to protect infant and young children from malnourishment and increased risk of infections. This systematic review assesses the evidence on infant and young child feeding (IYCF) practices in conflict settings. METHODOLOGY: We conducted a search in PubMed and CENTRAL and also searched for grey literature from the year 1980 to August 2019. We included studies conducted in settings inflicted with armed conflict; which comprised settings undergoing conflict, as well as, those within 5 years of its cessation. Studies were included if they discussed IYCF practices, barriers, programmes and guidelines to promote and improve IYCF practices. Two review authors independently evaluated and screened studies for eligibility and extracted data; followed by a descriptive and thematic analysis. RESULTS: We included 56 studies in our review including 11 published articles and 45 reports from grey literature and broadly classified into four predetermined sections: epidemiology (n=24), barriers/enablers (n=18), programmes/interventions (n=15) and implementation guidelines (n=30). Epidemiological evidence shows that IYCF practices were generally poor in conflict settings with median prevalence of exclusive breast feeding at 25%, continued breast feeding at 29%, bottle feeding at 58.3%, introduction to solid, semisolid or soft foods at 71.1% and minimum dietary diversity at 60.3%. IYCF practices were affected by displacement, stress, maternal malnutrition and mental health, family casualties and free distribution of breast milk substitutes. To improve IYCF, several interventions were implemented; including, training of health workers, educating mothers, community networking and mobilisation, lactation-support service, baby friendly hospital initiative, mother–baby friendly spaces and support groups. CONCLUSION: The evidence suggests that IYCF practices are generally poor in conflict inflicted settings. However, there is potential for improvement by designing effective interventions, responsibly disseminating, monitoring and implementing IYCF guidelines as prescribed by WHO development partners, government and non-government organisations with dedicated funds and investing in capacity development. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7488834/ /pubmed/32928852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036757 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Public Health
Rabbani, Amna
Padhani, Zahra A
A Siddiqui, Faareha
Das, Jai K
Bhutta, Zulfiqar
Systematic review of infant and young child feeding practices in conflict areas: what the evidence advocates
title Systematic review of infant and young child feeding practices in conflict areas: what the evidence advocates
title_full Systematic review of infant and young child feeding practices in conflict areas: what the evidence advocates
title_fullStr Systematic review of infant and young child feeding practices in conflict areas: what the evidence advocates
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review of infant and young child feeding practices in conflict areas: what the evidence advocates
title_short Systematic review of infant and young child feeding practices in conflict areas: what the evidence advocates
title_sort systematic review of infant and young child feeding practices in conflict areas: what the evidence advocates
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7488834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32928852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036757
work_keys_str_mv AT rabbaniamna systematicreviewofinfantandyoungchildfeedingpracticesinconflictareaswhattheevidenceadvocates
AT padhanizahraa systematicreviewofinfantandyoungchildfeedingpracticesinconflictareaswhattheevidenceadvocates
AT asiddiquifaareha systematicreviewofinfantandyoungchildfeedingpracticesinconflictareaswhattheevidenceadvocates
AT dasjaik systematicreviewofinfantandyoungchildfeedingpracticesinconflictareaswhattheevidenceadvocates
AT bhuttazulfiqar systematicreviewofinfantandyoungchildfeedingpracticesinconflictareaswhattheevidenceadvocates