Cargando…
Evaluating enhanced recovery after surgery: time to cover new ground and discover the missing patient voice
Multicomponent peri-operative interventions offer to accelerate patient recovery and improve cost-effectiveness. The recent National Institute of Health Research-commissioned evidence synthesis review by Nunns et al. considers the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of all types of multicomponent i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7489013/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32944227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13741-020-00157-1 |
_version_ | 1783581804291162112 |
---|---|
author | Nunns, Michael John, Joseph B. McGrath, John S. Shaw, Liz Briscoe, Simon Thompson Coon, Jo Hemsley, Anthony Lovegrove, Christopher J. Thomas, David Mythen, Michael G. Anderson, Rob |
author_facet | Nunns, Michael John, Joseph B. McGrath, John S. Shaw, Liz Briscoe, Simon Thompson Coon, Jo Hemsley, Anthony Lovegrove, Christopher J. Thomas, David Mythen, Michael G. Anderson, Rob |
author_sort | Nunns, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | Multicomponent peri-operative interventions offer to accelerate patient recovery and improve cost-effectiveness. The recent National Institute of Health Research-commissioned evidence synthesis review by Nunns et al. considers the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of all types of multicomponent interventions for older adults undergoing elective inpatient surgery. Enhanced recovery programmes (ERPs) were the most commonly evaluated intervention. An association between ERPs and decreased length of stay was observed, whilst complication rates and time to recovery were static or sometimes reduced. Important areas which lack research in the context of ERPs are patient-reported outcome measures, patients with complex needs and assessment of factors pertaining to successful ERP implementation. The next generation of ERP studies should seek to develop our understanding in these key areas. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7489013 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74890132020-09-16 Evaluating enhanced recovery after surgery: time to cover new ground and discover the missing patient voice Nunns, Michael John, Joseph B. McGrath, John S. Shaw, Liz Briscoe, Simon Thompson Coon, Jo Hemsley, Anthony Lovegrove, Christopher J. Thomas, David Mythen, Michael G. Anderson, Rob Perioper Med (Lond) Editorial Multicomponent peri-operative interventions offer to accelerate patient recovery and improve cost-effectiveness. The recent National Institute of Health Research-commissioned evidence synthesis review by Nunns et al. considers the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of all types of multicomponent interventions for older adults undergoing elective inpatient surgery. Enhanced recovery programmes (ERPs) were the most commonly evaluated intervention. An association between ERPs and decreased length of stay was observed, whilst complication rates and time to recovery were static or sometimes reduced. Important areas which lack research in the context of ERPs are patient-reported outcome measures, patients with complex needs and assessment of factors pertaining to successful ERP implementation. The next generation of ERP studies should seek to develop our understanding in these key areas. BioMed Central 2020-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7489013/ /pubmed/32944227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13741-020-00157-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Editorial Nunns, Michael John, Joseph B. McGrath, John S. Shaw, Liz Briscoe, Simon Thompson Coon, Jo Hemsley, Anthony Lovegrove, Christopher J. Thomas, David Mythen, Michael G. Anderson, Rob Evaluating enhanced recovery after surgery: time to cover new ground and discover the missing patient voice |
title | Evaluating enhanced recovery after surgery: time to cover new ground and discover the missing patient voice |
title_full | Evaluating enhanced recovery after surgery: time to cover new ground and discover the missing patient voice |
title_fullStr | Evaluating enhanced recovery after surgery: time to cover new ground and discover the missing patient voice |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating enhanced recovery after surgery: time to cover new ground and discover the missing patient voice |
title_short | Evaluating enhanced recovery after surgery: time to cover new ground and discover the missing patient voice |
title_sort | evaluating enhanced recovery after surgery: time to cover new ground and discover the missing patient voice |
topic | Editorial |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7489013/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32944227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13741-020-00157-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nunnsmichael evaluatingenhancedrecoveryaftersurgerytimetocovernewgroundanddiscoverthemissingpatientvoice AT johnjosephb evaluatingenhancedrecoveryaftersurgerytimetocovernewgroundanddiscoverthemissingpatientvoice AT mcgrathjohns evaluatingenhancedrecoveryaftersurgerytimetocovernewgroundanddiscoverthemissingpatientvoice AT shawliz evaluatingenhancedrecoveryaftersurgerytimetocovernewgroundanddiscoverthemissingpatientvoice AT briscoesimon evaluatingenhancedrecoveryaftersurgerytimetocovernewgroundanddiscoverthemissingpatientvoice AT thompsoncoonjo evaluatingenhancedrecoveryaftersurgerytimetocovernewgroundanddiscoverthemissingpatientvoice AT hemsleyanthony evaluatingenhancedrecoveryaftersurgerytimetocovernewgroundanddiscoverthemissingpatientvoice AT lovegrovechristopherj evaluatingenhancedrecoveryaftersurgerytimetocovernewgroundanddiscoverthemissingpatientvoice AT thomasdavid evaluatingenhancedrecoveryaftersurgerytimetocovernewgroundanddiscoverthemissingpatientvoice AT mythenmichaelg evaluatingenhancedrecoveryaftersurgerytimetocovernewgroundanddiscoverthemissingpatientvoice AT andersonrob evaluatingenhancedrecoveryaftersurgerytimetocovernewgroundanddiscoverthemissingpatientvoice |