Cargando…

Is gluteus medius injured in patients treated with a trochanter tip entry intramedullary nail? Clinical, electrophysiological and functional outcomes

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to assess the functional outcomes, static-dynamic postural stability of patients and evaluate electromyographic activity of gluteus medius (GMed) muscle during gait and spatiotemporal parameters of gait in patients after antegrade intramedullary nailing (IMN) of femoral s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ergişi, Yılmaz, Kafa, Nihan, Tokgöz, Mehmet Ali, Demir, Erdem, Hazar Kanık, Zeynep, Sezgin, Erdem Aras, Ataoğlu, Muhammet Baybars
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bayçınar Medical Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7489166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32584731
http://dx.doi.org/10.5606/ehc.2020.74801
_version_ 1783581829465374720
author Ergişi, Yılmaz
Kafa, Nihan
Tokgöz, Mehmet Ali
Demir, Erdem
Hazar Kanık, Zeynep
Sezgin, Erdem Aras
Ataoğlu, Muhammet Baybars
author_facet Ergişi, Yılmaz
Kafa, Nihan
Tokgöz, Mehmet Ali
Demir, Erdem
Hazar Kanık, Zeynep
Sezgin, Erdem Aras
Ataoğlu, Muhammet Baybars
author_sort Ergişi, Yılmaz
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study aims to assess the functional outcomes, static-dynamic postural stability of patients and evaluate electromyographic activity of gluteus medius (GMed) muscle during gait and spatiotemporal parameters of gait in patients after antegrade intramedullary nailing (IMN) of femoral shaft fractures with trochanter tip entry. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients (15 males, 1 female; mean age 34.8±15.2 years; range, 18 to 58 years) who were treated with an antegrade trochanteric IMN between January 2009 and July 2013 and eight healthy male controls (mean age 39.3±9.8 years; range, 27 to 57 years) were included in this retrospective study. Muscle strength, static and dynamic postural stability and fall risk were evaluated. In addition, spatiotemporal parameters of gait were assessed using a validated wireless inertial sensing device and a wireless electromyography (EMG) device was used to measure electromyographic activity of GMed muscle in both groups. RESULTS: There were significant differences in muscle strength, functional and dynamic balance test scores between operated and intact sides (one-leg hop test score p=0.009, balance test scores p<0.001-0.033). There were significant differences in functional and quality of life physical function test scores between groups (one-leg hop test score p=0.014). However, no significant differences were found in EMG results, dynamics balance, and statics postural stability test scores between groups (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: After isolated femur fracture, patients treated with antegrade trochanteric IMN demonstrated good static and dynamic stability and poor functional outcomes compared to controls. In conclusion, patients with antegrade trochanteric IMN have good balance but poor functional performance; however, further studies are needed to find out the primary reason for these results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7489166
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Bayçınar Medical Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74891662020-09-17 Is gluteus medius injured in patients treated with a trochanter tip entry intramedullary nail? Clinical, electrophysiological and functional outcomes Ergişi, Yılmaz Kafa, Nihan Tokgöz, Mehmet Ali Demir, Erdem Hazar Kanık, Zeynep Sezgin, Erdem Aras Ataoğlu, Muhammet Baybars Jt Dis Relat Surg Original Article OBJECTIVES: This study aims to assess the functional outcomes, static-dynamic postural stability of patients and evaluate electromyographic activity of gluteus medius (GMed) muscle during gait and spatiotemporal parameters of gait in patients after antegrade intramedullary nailing (IMN) of femoral shaft fractures with trochanter tip entry. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients (15 males, 1 female; mean age 34.8±15.2 years; range, 18 to 58 years) who were treated with an antegrade trochanteric IMN between January 2009 and July 2013 and eight healthy male controls (mean age 39.3±9.8 years; range, 27 to 57 years) were included in this retrospective study. Muscle strength, static and dynamic postural stability and fall risk were evaluated. In addition, spatiotemporal parameters of gait were assessed using a validated wireless inertial sensing device and a wireless electromyography (EMG) device was used to measure electromyographic activity of GMed muscle in both groups. RESULTS: There were significant differences in muscle strength, functional and dynamic balance test scores between operated and intact sides (one-leg hop test score p=0.009, balance test scores p<0.001-0.033). There were significant differences in functional and quality of life physical function test scores between groups (one-leg hop test score p=0.014). However, no significant differences were found in EMG results, dynamics balance, and statics postural stability test scores between groups (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: After isolated femur fracture, patients treated with antegrade trochanteric IMN demonstrated good static and dynamic stability and poor functional outcomes compared to controls. In conclusion, patients with antegrade trochanteric IMN have good balance but poor functional performance; however, further studies are needed to find out the primary reason for these results. Bayçınar Medical Publishing 2020-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7489166/ /pubmed/32584731 http://dx.doi.org/10.5606/ehc.2020.74801 Text en Copyright © 2020, Turkish Joint Diseases Foundation http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ergişi, Yılmaz
Kafa, Nihan
Tokgöz, Mehmet Ali
Demir, Erdem
Hazar Kanık, Zeynep
Sezgin, Erdem Aras
Ataoğlu, Muhammet Baybars
Is gluteus medius injured in patients treated with a trochanter tip entry intramedullary nail? Clinical, electrophysiological and functional outcomes
title Is gluteus medius injured in patients treated with a trochanter tip entry intramedullary nail? Clinical, electrophysiological and functional outcomes
title_full Is gluteus medius injured in patients treated with a trochanter tip entry intramedullary nail? Clinical, electrophysiological and functional outcomes
title_fullStr Is gluteus medius injured in patients treated with a trochanter tip entry intramedullary nail? Clinical, electrophysiological and functional outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Is gluteus medius injured in patients treated with a trochanter tip entry intramedullary nail? Clinical, electrophysiological and functional outcomes
title_short Is gluteus medius injured in patients treated with a trochanter tip entry intramedullary nail? Clinical, electrophysiological and functional outcomes
title_sort is gluteus medius injured in patients treated with a trochanter tip entry intramedullary nail? clinical, electrophysiological and functional outcomes
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7489166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32584731
http://dx.doi.org/10.5606/ehc.2020.74801
work_keys_str_mv AT ergisiyılmaz isgluteusmediusinjuredinpatientstreatedwithatrochantertipentryintramedullarynailclinicalelectrophysiologicalandfunctionaloutcomes
AT kafanihan isgluteusmediusinjuredinpatientstreatedwithatrochantertipentryintramedullarynailclinicalelectrophysiologicalandfunctionaloutcomes
AT tokgozmehmetali isgluteusmediusinjuredinpatientstreatedwithatrochantertipentryintramedullarynailclinicalelectrophysiologicalandfunctionaloutcomes
AT demirerdem isgluteusmediusinjuredinpatientstreatedwithatrochantertipentryintramedullarynailclinicalelectrophysiologicalandfunctionaloutcomes
AT hazarkanıkzeynep isgluteusmediusinjuredinpatientstreatedwithatrochantertipentryintramedullarynailclinicalelectrophysiologicalandfunctionaloutcomes
AT sezginerdemaras isgluteusmediusinjuredinpatientstreatedwithatrochantertipentryintramedullarynailclinicalelectrophysiologicalandfunctionaloutcomes
AT ataoglumuhammetbaybars isgluteusmediusinjuredinpatientstreatedwithatrochantertipentryintramedullarynailclinicalelectrophysiologicalandfunctionaloutcomes