Cargando…
Is gluteus medius injured in patients treated with a trochanter tip entry intramedullary nail? Clinical, electrophysiological and functional outcomes
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to assess the functional outcomes, static-dynamic postural stability of patients and evaluate electromyographic activity of gluteus medius (GMed) muscle during gait and spatiotemporal parameters of gait in patients after antegrade intramedullary nailing (IMN) of femoral s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bayçınar Medical Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7489166/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32584731 http://dx.doi.org/10.5606/ehc.2020.74801 |
_version_ | 1783581829465374720 |
---|---|
author | Ergişi, Yılmaz Kafa, Nihan Tokgöz, Mehmet Ali Demir, Erdem Hazar Kanık, Zeynep Sezgin, Erdem Aras Ataoğlu, Muhammet Baybars |
author_facet | Ergişi, Yılmaz Kafa, Nihan Tokgöz, Mehmet Ali Demir, Erdem Hazar Kanık, Zeynep Sezgin, Erdem Aras Ataoğlu, Muhammet Baybars |
author_sort | Ergişi, Yılmaz |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: This study aims to assess the functional outcomes, static-dynamic postural stability of patients and evaluate electromyographic activity of gluteus medius (GMed) muscle during gait and spatiotemporal parameters of gait in patients after antegrade intramedullary nailing (IMN) of femoral shaft fractures with trochanter tip entry. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients (15 males, 1 female; mean age 34.8±15.2 years; range, 18 to 58 years) who were treated with an antegrade trochanteric IMN between January 2009 and July 2013 and eight healthy male controls (mean age 39.3±9.8 years; range, 27 to 57 years) were included in this retrospective study. Muscle strength, static and dynamic postural stability and fall risk were evaluated. In addition, spatiotemporal parameters of gait were assessed using a validated wireless inertial sensing device and a wireless electromyography (EMG) device was used to measure electromyographic activity of GMed muscle in both groups. RESULTS: There were significant differences in muscle strength, functional and dynamic balance test scores between operated and intact sides (one-leg hop test score p=0.009, balance test scores p<0.001-0.033). There were significant differences in functional and quality of life physical function test scores between groups (one-leg hop test score p=0.014). However, no significant differences were found in EMG results, dynamics balance, and statics postural stability test scores between groups (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: After isolated femur fracture, patients treated with antegrade trochanteric IMN demonstrated good static and dynamic stability and poor functional outcomes compared to controls. In conclusion, patients with antegrade trochanteric IMN have good balance but poor functional performance; however, further studies are needed to find out the primary reason for these results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7489166 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Bayçınar Medical Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74891662020-09-17 Is gluteus medius injured in patients treated with a trochanter tip entry intramedullary nail? Clinical, electrophysiological and functional outcomes Ergişi, Yılmaz Kafa, Nihan Tokgöz, Mehmet Ali Demir, Erdem Hazar Kanık, Zeynep Sezgin, Erdem Aras Ataoğlu, Muhammet Baybars Jt Dis Relat Surg Original Article OBJECTIVES: This study aims to assess the functional outcomes, static-dynamic postural stability of patients and evaluate electromyographic activity of gluteus medius (GMed) muscle during gait and spatiotemporal parameters of gait in patients after antegrade intramedullary nailing (IMN) of femoral shaft fractures with trochanter tip entry. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients (15 males, 1 female; mean age 34.8±15.2 years; range, 18 to 58 years) who were treated with an antegrade trochanteric IMN between January 2009 and July 2013 and eight healthy male controls (mean age 39.3±9.8 years; range, 27 to 57 years) were included in this retrospective study. Muscle strength, static and dynamic postural stability and fall risk were evaluated. In addition, spatiotemporal parameters of gait were assessed using a validated wireless inertial sensing device and a wireless electromyography (EMG) device was used to measure electromyographic activity of GMed muscle in both groups. RESULTS: There were significant differences in muscle strength, functional and dynamic balance test scores between operated and intact sides (one-leg hop test score p=0.009, balance test scores p<0.001-0.033). There were significant differences in functional and quality of life physical function test scores between groups (one-leg hop test score p=0.014). However, no significant differences were found in EMG results, dynamics balance, and statics postural stability test scores between groups (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: After isolated femur fracture, patients treated with antegrade trochanteric IMN demonstrated good static and dynamic stability and poor functional outcomes compared to controls. In conclusion, patients with antegrade trochanteric IMN have good balance but poor functional performance; however, further studies are needed to find out the primary reason for these results. Bayçınar Medical Publishing 2020-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7489166/ /pubmed/32584731 http://dx.doi.org/10.5606/ehc.2020.74801 Text en Copyright © 2020, Turkish Joint Diseases Foundation http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ergişi, Yılmaz Kafa, Nihan Tokgöz, Mehmet Ali Demir, Erdem Hazar Kanık, Zeynep Sezgin, Erdem Aras Ataoğlu, Muhammet Baybars Is gluteus medius injured in patients treated with a trochanter tip entry intramedullary nail? Clinical, electrophysiological and functional outcomes |
title | Is gluteus medius injured in patients treated with a trochanter tip entry intramedullary nail? Clinical, electrophysiological and functional outcomes |
title_full | Is gluteus medius injured in patients treated with a trochanter tip entry intramedullary nail? Clinical, electrophysiological and functional outcomes |
title_fullStr | Is gluteus medius injured in patients treated with a trochanter tip entry intramedullary nail? Clinical, electrophysiological and functional outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Is gluteus medius injured in patients treated with a trochanter tip entry intramedullary nail? Clinical, electrophysiological and functional outcomes |
title_short | Is gluteus medius injured in patients treated with a trochanter tip entry intramedullary nail? Clinical, electrophysiological and functional outcomes |
title_sort | is gluteus medius injured in patients treated with a trochanter tip entry intramedullary nail? clinical, electrophysiological and functional outcomes |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7489166/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32584731 http://dx.doi.org/10.5606/ehc.2020.74801 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ergisiyılmaz isgluteusmediusinjuredinpatientstreatedwithatrochantertipentryintramedullarynailclinicalelectrophysiologicalandfunctionaloutcomes AT kafanihan isgluteusmediusinjuredinpatientstreatedwithatrochantertipentryintramedullarynailclinicalelectrophysiologicalandfunctionaloutcomes AT tokgozmehmetali isgluteusmediusinjuredinpatientstreatedwithatrochantertipentryintramedullarynailclinicalelectrophysiologicalandfunctionaloutcomes AT demirerdem isgluteusmediusinjuredinpatientstreatedwithatrochantertipentryintramedullarynailclinicalelectrophysiologicalandfunctionaloutcomes AT hazarkanıkzeynep isgluteusmediusinjuredinpatientstreatedwithatrochantertipentryintramedullarynailclinicalelectrophysiologicalandfunctionaloutcomes AT sezginerdemaras isgluteusmediusinjuredinpatientstreatedwithatrochantertipentryintramedullarynailclinicalelectrophysiologicalandfunctionaloutcomes AT ataoglumuhammetbaybars isgluteusmediusinjuredinpatientstreatedwithatrochantertipentryintramedullarynailclinicalelectrophysiologicalandfunctionaloutcomes |