Cargando…

Multidisciplinary approach in the treatment of osteoid osteoma with radiofrequency ablation

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to present the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to radiofrequency ablation (RFA) treatment in osteoid osteoma (OO) patients by a team of experts in their field in preventing recurrence and complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: For this retrospective study, a team...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tanrıverdi, Bülent, Erbahçeci Salık, Aysun, Çetingök, Halil, Edipoğlu, Erdem, Bilgili, Mustafa Gökhan, Güven, Koray, Saçan, Filiz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bayçınar Medical Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7489167/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32584722
http://dx.doi.org/10.5606/ehc.2020.71413
_version_ 1783581829695012864
author Tanrıverdi, Bülent
Erbahçeci Salık, Aysun
Çetingök, Halil
Edipoğlu, Erdem
Bilgili, Mustafa Gökhan
Güven, Koray
Saçan, Filiz
author_facet Tanrıverdi, Bülent
Erbahçeci Salık, Aysun
Çetingök, Halil
Edipoğlu, Erdem
Bilgili, Mustafa Gökhan
Güven, Koray
Saçan, Filiz
author_sort Tanrıverdi, Bülent
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study aims to present the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to radiofrequency ablation (RFA) treatment in osteoid osteoma (OO) patients by a team of experts in their field in preventing recurrence and complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: For this retrospective study, a team of two orthopedists, two interventional radiologists, and one anesthesiologist was established in January 2013 to manage the diagnosis, follow-up, and treatment process of patients with OO at Bakırköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital. A total of 27 patients (15 males, 12 females; mean age 22.9 years; range, 9 to 54 years) were treated by this team between February 2013 and September 2016. The anatomic localization included iliac crest in four patients, the femur in 12 patients, fibula in two patients, humerus in three patients, radius in one patient, tibia in three patients, talus in one patient, and metacarpal in one patient. The procedures were carried out by the same interventional radiologists, same orthopedic surgeons, and same anesthesiologist in the computed tomography (CT) unit under aseptic conditions. After appropriate anesthesia for the localization of OO, the patient was positioned on the CT bed and the localization of the lesion was confirmed with a CT scan mapping. Then, a bone penetration cannula was advanced and bone cortex was penetrated with a charged motor and Kirschner (K)-wire. When the cannula reached the nidus, it was replaced with RFA probe. Ablation of the nidus was performed for five minutes at 90°C. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 46 months (range, 25 to 66 months). Patients were evaluated with visual analog scale (VAS) scores preoperatively and at postoperative 15th day, sixth month, and first year. In the last evaluation of the study data, the patients were called by telephone and questioned whether there were any changes in their final status. The mean preoperative VAS score was 7.2. The mean postoperative VAS scores of the 15th day, sixth month, and first year were 1.3, 0.6, and 0, respectively. In the last follow-up, the OO-related pain completely disappeared and none of the patients had any recurrence. There was a significant difference between preoperative and postoperative 15th day and sixth month VAS score measurements. CONCLUSION: Radiofrequency ablation treatment of OOs is a minimally invasive, safe, low-cost, and efficient method. We believe that with experienced teams and appropriate planning, RFA will take part in practice as the standard treatment of OO.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7489167
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Bayçınar Medical Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74891672020-09-17 Multidisciplinary approach in the treatment of osteoid osteoma with radiofrequency ablation Tanrıverdi, Bülent Erbahçeci Salık, Aysun Çetingök, Halil Edipoğlu, Erdem Bilgili, Mustafa Gökhan Güven, Koray Saçan, Filiz Jt Dis Relat Surg Original Article OBJECTIVES: This study aims to present the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to radiofrequency ablation (RFA) treatment in osteoid osteoma (OO) patients by a team of experts in their field in preventing recurrence and complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: For this retrospective study, a team of two orthopedists, two interventional radiologists, and one anesthesiologist was established in January 2013 to manage the diagnosis, follow-up, and treatment process of patients with OO at Bakırköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital. A total of 27 patients (15 males, 12 females; mean age 22.9 years; range, 9 to 54 years) were treated by this team between February 2013 and September 2016. The anatomic localization included iliac crest in four patients, the femur in 12 patients, fibula in two patients, humerus in three patients, radius in one patient, tibia in three patients, talus in one patient, and metacarpal in one patient. The procedures were carried out by the same interventional radiologists, same orthopedic surgeons, and same anesthesiologist in the computed tomography (CT) unit under aseptic conditions. After appropriate anesthesia for the localization of OO, the patient was positioned on the CT bed and the localization of the lesion was confirmed with a CT scan mapping. Then, a bone penetration cannula was advanced and bone cortex was penetrated with a charged motor and Kirschner (K)-wire. When the cannula reached the nidus, it was replaced with RFA probe. Ablation of the nidus was performed for five minutes at 90°C. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 46 months (range, 25 to 66 months). Patients were evaluated with visual analog scale (VAS) scores preoperatively and at postoperative 15th day, sixth month, and first year. In the last evaluation of the study data, the patients were called by telephone and questioned whether there were any changes in their final status. The mean preoperative VAS score was 7.2. The mean postoperative VAS scores of the 15th day, sixth month, and first year were 1.3, 0.6, and 0, respectively. In the last follow-up, the OO-related pain completely disappeared and none of the patients had any recurrence. There was a significant difference between preoperative and postoperative 15th day and sixth month VAS score measurements. CONCLUSION: Radiofrequency ablation treatment of OOs is a minimally invasive, safe, low-cost, and efficient method. We believe that with experienced teams and appropriate planning, RFA will take part in practice as the standard treatment of OO. Bayçınar Medical Publishing 2020-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7489167/ /pubmed/32584722 http://dx.doi.org/10.5606/ehc.2020.71413 Text en Copyright © 2020, Turkish Joint Diseases Foundation http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Article
Tanrıverdi, Bülent
Erbahçeci Salık, Aysun
Çetingök, Halil
Edipoğlu, Erdem
Bilgili, Mustafa Gökhan
Güven, Koray
Saçan, Filiz
Multidisciplinary approach in the treatment of osteoid osteoma with radiofrequency ablation
title Multidisciplinary approach in the treatment of osteoid osteoma with radiofrequency ablation
title_full Multidisciplinary approach in the treatment of osteoid osteoma with radiofrequency ablation
title_fullStr Multidisciplinary approach in the treatment of osteoid osteoma with radiofrequency ablation
title_full_unstemmed Multidisciplinary approach in the treatment of osteoid osteoma with radiofrequency ablation
title_short Multidisciplinary approach in the treatment of osteoid osteoma with radiofrequency ablation
title_sort multidisciplinary approach in the treatment of osteoid osteoma with radiofrequency ablation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7489167/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32584722
http://dx.doi.org/10.5606/ehc.2020.71413
work_keys_str_mv AT tanrıverdibulent multidisciplinaryapproachinthetreatmentofosteoidosteomawithradiofrequencyablation
AT erbahcecisalıkaysun multidisciplinaryapproachinthetreatmentofosteoidosteomawithradiofrequencyablation
AT cetingokhalil multidisciplinaryapproachinthetreatmentofosteoidosteomawithradiofrequencyablation
AT edipogluerdem multidisciplinaryapproachinthetreatmentofosteoidosteomawithradiofrequencyablation
AT bilgilimustafagokhan multidisciplinaryapproachinthetreatmentofosteoidosteomawithradiofrequencyablation
AT guvenkoray multidisciplinaryapproachinthetreatmentofosteoidosteomawithradiofrequencyablation
AT sacanfiliz multidisciplinaryapproachinthetreatmentofosteoidosteomawithradiofrequencyablation