Cargando…

Is the cross-finger flap a good option at the extensor zone defect?

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate the surgical and clinical outcomes of reversed cross-finger subcutaneous flaps applied to patients with dorsal digital defects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2015 and September 2018, 25 (22 males, 3 females; mean age 35.6±11.6 years; range, 19 to 65 ye...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ekinci, Yakup, Gürbüz, Kaan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bayçınar Medical Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7489178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32584724
http://dx.doi.org/10.5606/ehc.2020.73030
_version_ 1783581832257732608
author Ekinci, Yakup
Gürbüz, Kaan
author_facet Ekinci, Yakup
Gürbüz, Kaan
author_sort Ekinci, Yakup
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate the surgical and clinical outcomes of reversed cross-finger subcutaneous flaps applied to patients with dorsal digital defects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2015 and September 2018, 25 (22 males, 3 females; mean age 35.6±11.6 years; range, 19 to 65 years) out of 27 patients under prospective follow-up with finger dorsal digital defect were retrospectively screened and included in the study. The data, obtained by the same two surgeons at six months postoperatively in patients who had undergone reversed cross-finger subcutaneous flaps surgery, concerned cold intolerance, a static two-point separation test, and functional results using range of motion (ROM) and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scoring. RESULTS: The majority of the patients presented with occupational injury (64%), most commonly to the dominant hand (76%) and the fourth finger (36%) most frequently. Seven patients with extensor tendon defects underwent reconstruction with a palmaris longus autograft. At the six-week postoperative follow-up, all flaps were live, the donor site had no morbidity, and no additional intervention was performed. There was no statistically significant difference in finger joint ROM (p>0.05). Cold intolerance was observed in 14 patients (56%). The mean dynamic two-point distinction was 6.0±0.7 mm and the QuickDASH score was 22.3±5.0. CONCLUSION: Due to reasons such as minimal donor site morbidity, satisfactory functional finger outcomes, and easy applicability, reversed cross-finger subcutaneous flap is a good option for reconstruction of defects in the dorsal aspect of the finger with or without extensor mechanism defects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7489178
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Bayçınar Medical Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74891782020-09-17 Is the cross-finger flap a good option at the extensor zone defect? Ekinci, Yakup Gürbüz, Kaan Jt Dis Relat Surg Original Article OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate the surgical and clinical outcomes of reversed cross-finger subcutaneous flaps applied to patients with dorsal digital defects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2015 and September 2018, 25 (22 males, 3 females; mean age 35.6±11.6 years; range, 19 to 65 years) out of 27 patients under prospective follow-up with finger dorsal digital defect were retrospectively screened and included in the study. The data, obtained by the same two surgeons at six months postoperatively in patients who had undergone reversed cross-finger subcutaneous flaps surgery, concerned cold intolerance, a static two-point separation test, and functional results using range of motion (ROM) and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scoring. RESULTS: The majority of the patients presented with occupational injury (64%), most commonly to the dominant hand (76%) and the fourth finger (36%) most frequently. Seven patients with extensor tendon defects underwent reconstruction with a palmaris longus autograft. At the six-week postoperative follow-up, all flaps were live, the donor site had no morbidity, and no additional intervention was performed. There was no statistically significant difference in finger joint ROM (p>0.05). Cold intolerance was observed in 14 patients (56%). The mean dynamic two-point distinction was 6.0±0.7 mm and the QuickDASH score was 22.3±5.0. CONCLUSION: Due to reasons such as minimal donor site morbidity, satisfactory functional finger outcomes, and easy applicability, reversed cross-finger subcutaneous flap is a good option for reconstruction of defects in the dorsal aspect of the finger with or without extensor mechanism defects. Bayçınar Medical Publishing 2020-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7489178/ /pubmed/32584724 http://dx.doi.org/10.5606/ehc.2020.73030 Text en Copyright © 2020, Turkish Joint Diseases Foundation http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ekinci, Yakup
Gürbüz, Kaan
Is the cross-finger flap a good option at the extensor zone defect?
title Is the cross-finger flap a good option at the extensor zone defect?
title_full Is the cross-finger flap a good option at the extensor zone defect?
title_fullStr Is the cross-finger flap a good option at the extensor zone defect?
title_full_unstemmed Is the cross-finger flap a good option at the extensor zone defect?
title_short Is the cross-finger flap a good option at the extensor zone defect?
title_sort is the cross-finger flap a good option at the extensor zone defect?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7489178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32584724
http://dx.doi.org/10.5606/ehc.2020.73030
work_keys_str_mv AT ekinciyakup isthecrossfingerflapagoodoptionattheextensorzonedefect
AT gurbuzkaan isthecrossfingerflapagoodoptionattheextensorzonedefect