Cargando…

Successful Model for Guideline Implementation to Prevent Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in the Ambulatory Cancer Clinic

PURPOSE: Guidelines recommend venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk assessment in outpatients with cancer and pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in selected patients at high risk for VTE. Although validated risk stratification tools are available, < 10% of oncologists use a risk assessment tool, and ra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holmes, Chris E., Ades, Steven, Gilchrist, Susan, Douce, Daniel, Libby, Karen, Rogala, Britny, Parenteau, Emily, Cushman, Mary, Holm, Allison Kaigle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society of Clinical Oncology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7489490/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32267798
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JOP.19.00697
_version_ 1783581863859716096
author Holmes, Chris E.
Ades, Steven
Gilchrist, Susan
Douce, Daniel
Libby, Karen
Rogala, Britny
Parenteau, Emily
Cushman, Mary
Holm, Allison Kaigle
author_facet Holmes, Chris E.
Ades, Steven
Gilchrist, Susan
Douce, Daniel
Libby, Karen
Rogala, Britny
Parenteau, Emily
Cushman, Mary
Holm, Allison Kaigle
author_sort Holmes, Chris E.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Guidelines recommend venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk assessment in outpatients with cancer and pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in selected patients at high risk for VTE. Although validated risk stratification tools are available, < 10% of oncologists use a risk assessment tool, and rates of VTE prophylaxis in high-risk patients are low in practice. We hypothesized that implementation of a systems-based program that uses the electronic health record (EHR) and offers personalized VTE prophylaxis recommendations would increase VTE risk assessment rates in patients initiating outpatient chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in the Ambulatory Cancer Clinic (VTEPACC) was a multidisciplinary program implemented by nurses, oncologists, pharmacists, hematologists, advanced practice providers, and quality partners. We prospectively identified high-risk patients using the Khorana and Protecht scores (≥ 3 points) via an EHR-based risk assessment tool. Patients with a predicted high risk of VTE during treatment were offered a hematology consultation to consider VTE prophylaxis. Results of the consultation were communicated to the treating oncologist, and clinical outcomes were tracked. RESULTS: A total of 918 outpatients with cancer initiating cancer-directed therapy were evaluated. VTE monthly education rates increased from < 5% before VTEPACC to 81.6% (standard deviation [SD], 11.9; range, 63.6%-97.7%) during the implementation phase and 94.7% (SD, 4.9; range, 82.1%-100%) for the full 2-year postimplementation phase. In the postimplementation phase, 213 patients (23.2%) were identified as being at high risk for developing a VTE. Referrals to hematology were offered to 151 patients (71%), with 141 patients (93%) being assessed and 93.8% receiving VTE prophylaxis. CONCLUSION: VTEPACC is a successful model for guideline implementation to provide VTE risk assessment and prophylaxis to prevent cancer-associated thrombosis in outpatients. Methods applied can readily translate into practice and overcome the current implementation gaps between guidelines and clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7489490
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher American Society of Clinical Oncology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74894902021-09-01 Successful Model for Guideline Implementation to Prevent Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in the Ambulatory Cancer Clinic Holmes, Chris E. Ades, Steven Gilchrist, Susan Douce, Daniel Libby, Karen Rogala, Britny Parenteau, Emily Cushman, Mary Holm, Allison Kaigle JCO Oncol Pract ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS PURPOSE: Guidelines recommend venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk assessment in outpatients with cancer and pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in selected patients at high risk for VTE. Although validated risk stratification tools are available, < 10% of oncologists use a risk assessment tool, and rates of VTE prophylaxis in high-risk patients are low in practice. We hypothesized that implementation of a systems-based program that uses the electronic health record (EHR) and offers personalized VTE prophylaxis recommendations would increase VTE risk assessment rates in patients initiating outpatient chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in the Ambulatory Cancer Clinic (VTEPACC) was a multidisciplinary program implemented by nurses, oncologists, pharmacists, hematologists, advanced practice providers, and quality partners. We prospectively identified high-risk patients using the Khorana and Protecht scores (≥ 3 points) via an EHR-based risk assessment tool. Patients with a predicted high risk of VTE during treatment were offered a hematology consultation to consider VTE prophylaxis. Results of the consultation were communicated to the treating oncologist, and clinical outcomes were tracked. RESULTS: A total of 918 outpatients with cancer initiating cancer-directed therapy were evaluated. VTE monthly education rates increased from < 5% before VTEPACC to 81.6% (standard deviation [SD], 11.9; range, 63.6%-97.7%) during the implementation phase and 94.7% (SD, 4.9; range, 82.1%-100%) for the full 2-year postimplementation phase. In the postimplementation phase, 213 patients (23.2%) were identified as being at high risk for developing a VTE. Referrals to hematology were offered to 151 patients (71%), with 141 patients (93%) being assessed and 93.8% receiving VTE prophylaxis. CONCLUSION: VTEPACC is a successful model for guideline implementation to provide VTE risk assessment and prophylaxis to prevent cancer-associated thrombosis in outpatients. Methods applied can readily translate into practice and overcome the current implementation gaps between guidelines and clinical practice. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2020-09 2020-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7489490/ /pubmed/32267798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JOP.19.00697 Text en © 2020 by American Society of Clinical Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
Holmes, Chris E.
Ades, Steven
Gilchrist, Susan
Douce, Daniel
Libby, Karen
Rogala, Britny
Parenteau, Emily
Cushman, Mary
Holm, Allison Kaigle
Successful Model for Guideline Implementation to Prevent Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in the Ambulatory Cancer Clinic
title Successful Model for Guideline Implementation to Prevent Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in the Ambulatory Cancer Clinic
title_full Successful Model for Guideline Implementation to Prevent Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in the Ambulatory Cancer Clinic
title_fullStr Successful Model for Guideline Implementation to Prevent Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in the Ambulatory Cancer Clinic
title_full_unstemmed Successful Model for Guideline Implementation to Prevent Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in the Ambulatory Cancer Clinic
title_short Successful Model for Guideline Implementation to Prevent Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in the Ambulatory Cancer Clinic
title_sort successful model for guideline implementation to prevent cancer-associated thrombosis: venous thromboembolism prevention in the ambulatory cancer clinic
topic ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7489490/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32267798
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JOP.19.00697
work_keys_str_mv AT holmeschrise successfulmodelforguidelineimplementationtopreventcancerassociatedthrombosisvenousthromboembolismpreventionintheambulatorycancerclinic
AT adessteven successfulmodelforguidelineimplementationtopreventcancerassociatedthrombosisvenousthromboembolismpreventionintheambulatorycancerclinic
AT gilchristsusan successfulmodelforguidelineimplementationtopreventcancerassociatedthrombosisvenousthromboembolismpreventionintheambulatorycancerclinic
AT doucedaniel successfulmodelforguidelineimplementationtopreventcancerassociatedthrombosisvenousthromboembolismpreventionintheambulatorycancerclinic
AT libbykaren successfulmodelforguidelineimplementationtopreventcancerassociatedthrombosisvenousthromboembolismpreventionintheambulatorycancerclinic
AT rogalabritny successfulmodelforguidelineimplementationtopreventcancerassociatedthrombosisvenousthromboembolismpreventionintheambulatorycancerclinic
AT parenteauemily successfulmodelforguidelineimplementationtopreventcancerassociatedthrombosisvenousthromboembolismpreventionintheambulatorycancerclinic
AT cushmanmary successfulmodelforguidelineimplementationtopreventcancerassociatedthrombosisvenousthromboembolismpreventionintheambulatorycancerclinic
AT holmallisonkaigle successfulmodelforguidelineimplementationtopreventcancerassociatedthrombosisvenousthromboembolismpreventionintheambulatorycancerclinic