Cargando…
Inner experience differs in rumination and distraction without a change in electromyographical correlates of inner speech
Ruminative thought is a style of thinking which involves repetitively focusing upon one’s own negative mood, its causes and its consequences. The negative effects of rumination are well-documented, but comparatively little is known about how rumination is experienced. The evaluative nature of rumina...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7489561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32925961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238920 |
_version_ | 1783581878425485312 |
---|---|
author | Moffatt, Jamie Mitrenga, Kaja Julia Alderson-Day, Ben Moseley, Peter Fernyhough, Charles |
author_facet | Moffatt, Jamie Mitrenga, Kaja Julia Alderson-Day, Ben Moseley, Peter Fernyhough, Charles |
author_sort | Moffatt, Jamie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ruminative thought is a style of thinking which involves repetitively focusing upon one’s own negative mood, its causes and its consequences. The negative effects of rumination are well-documented, but comparatively little is known about how rumination is experienced. The evaluative nature of rumination suggests that it could involve more inner speech than non-ruminative states. The present study (N = 31) combined facial electromyography and self-report questionnaires to determine the type of inner experience that occurs in rumination. The results showed that induced rumination involved similar levels of muscle activity related to inner speech as periods of induced distraction. However, experience sampling and questionnaire responses showed that rumination involved more verbal thought, and also involved more evaluative and dialogic inner speech than distraction. These findings contribute to the understanding of inner speech as a flexible phenomenon and confirms the importance of employing multiple methods to investigate inner speech. Future research should clarify the link between inner speech in rumination and its negative effects on wellbeing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7489561 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74895612020-09-22 Inner experience differs in rumination and distraction without a change in electromyographical correlates of inner speech Moffatt, Jamie Mitrenga, Kaja Julia Alderson-Day, Ben Moseley, Peter Fernyhough, Charles PLoS One Research Article Ruminative thought is a style of thinking which involves repetitively focusing upon one’s own negative mood, its causes and its consequences. The negative effects of rumination are well-documented, but comparatively little is known about how rumination is experienced. The evaluative nature of rumination suggests that it could involve more inner speech than non-ruminative states. The present study (N = 31) combined facial electromyography and self-report questionnaires to determine the type of inner experience that occurs in rumination. The results showed that induced rumination involved similar levels of muscle activity related to inner speech as periods of induced distraction. However, experience sampling and questionnaire responses showed that rumination involved more verbal thought, and also involved more evaluative and dialogic inner speech than distraction. These findings contribute to the understanding of inner speech as a flexible phenomenon and confirms the importance of employing multiple methods to investigate inner speech. Future research should clarify the link between inner speech in rumination and its negative effects on wellbeing. Public Library of Science 2020-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7489561/ /pubmed/32925961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238920 Text en © 2020 Moffatt et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Moffatt, Jamie Mitrenga, Kaja Julia Alderson-Day, Ben Moseley, Peter Fernyhough, Charles Inner experience differs in rumination and distraction without a change in electromyographical correlates of inner speech |
title | Inner experience differs in rumination and distraction without a change in electromyographical correlates of inner speech |
title_full | Inner experience differs in rumination and distraction without a change in electromyographical correlates of inner speech |
title_fullStr | Inner experience differs in rumination and distraction without a change in electromyographical correlates of inner speech |
title_full_unstemmed | Inner experience differs in rumination and distraction without a change in electromyographical correlates of inner speech |
title_short | Inner experience differs in rumination and distraction without a change in electromyographical correlates of inner speech |
title_sort | inner experience differs in rumination and distraction without a change in electromyographical correlates of inner speech |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7489561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32925961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238920 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moffattjamie innerexperiencediffersinruminationanddistractionwithoutachangeinelectromyographicalcorrelatesofinnerspeech AT mitrengakajajulia innerexperiencediffersinruminationanddistractionwithoutachangeinelectromyographicalcorrelatesofinnerspeech AT aldersondayben innerexperiencediffersinruminationanddistractionwithoutachangeinelectromyographicalcorrelatesofinnerspeech AT moseleypeter innerexperiencediffersinruminationanddistractionwithoutachangeinelectromyographicalcorrelatesofinnerspeech AT fernyhoughcharles innerexperiencediffersinruminationanddistractionwithoutachangeinelectromyographicalcorrelatesofinnerspeech |