Cargando…

Inner experience differs in rumination and distraction without a change in electromyographical correlates of inner speech

Ruminative thought is a style of thinking which involves repetitively focusing upon one’s own negative mood, its causes and its consequences. The negative effects of rumination are well-documented, but comparatively little is known about how rumination is experienced. The evaluative nature of rumina...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moffatt, Jamie, Mitrenga, Kaja Julia, Alderson-Day, Ben, Moseley, Peter, Fernyhough, Charles
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7489561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32925961
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238920
_version_ 1783581878425485312
author Moffatt, Jamie
Mitrenga, Kaja Julia
Alderson-Day, Ben
Moseley, Peter
Fernyhough, Charles
author_facet Moffatt, Jamie
Mitrenga, Kaja Julia
Alderson-Day, Ben
Moseley, Peter
Fernyhough, Charles
author_sort Moffatt, Jamie
collection PubMed
description Ruminative thought is a style of thinking which involves repetitively focusing upon one’s own negative mood, its causes and its consequences. The negative effects of rumination are well-documented, but comparatively little is known about how rumination is experienced. The evaluative nature of rumination suggests that it could involve more inner speech than non-ruminative states. The present study (N = 31) combined facial electromyography and self-report questionnaires to determine the type of inner experience that occurs in rumination. The results showed that induced rumination involved similar levels of muscle activity related to inner speech as periods of induced distraction. However, experience sampling and questionnaire responses showed that rumination involved more verbal thought, and also involved more evaluative and dialogic inner speech than distraction. These findings contribute to the understanding of inner speech as a flexible phenomenon and confirms the importance of employing multiple methods to investigate inner speech. Future research should clarify the link between inner speech in rumination and its negative effects on wellbeing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7489561
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74895612020-09-22 Inner experience differs in rumination and distraction without a change in electromyographical correlates of inner speech Moffatt, Jamie Mitrenga, Kaja Julia Alderson-Day, Ben Moseley, Peter Fernyhough, Charles PLoS One Research Article Ruminative thought is a style of thinking which involves repetitively focusing upon one’s own negative mood, its causes and its consequences. The negative effects of rumination are well-documented, but comparatively little is known about how rumination is experienced. The evaluative nature of rumination suggests that it could involve more inner speech than non-ruminative states. The present study (N = 31) combined facial electromyography and self-report questionnaires to determine the type of inner experience that occurs in rumination. The results showed that induced rumination involved similar levels of muscle activity related to inner speech as periods of induced distraction. However, experience sampling and questionnaire responses showed that rumination involved more verbal thought, and also involved more evaluative and dialogic inner speech than distraction. These findings contribute to the understanding of inner speech as a flexible phenomenon and confirms the importance of employing multiple methods to investigate inner speech. Future research should clarify the link between inner speech in rumination and its negative effects on wellbeing. Public Library of Science 2020-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7489561/ /pubmed/32925961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238920 Text en © 2020 Moffatt et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Moffatt, Jamie
Mitrenga, Kaja Julia
Alderson-Day, Ben
Moseley, Peter
Fernyhough, Charles
Inner experience differs in rumination and distraction without a change in electromyographical correlates of inner speech
title Inner experience differs in rumination and distraction without a change in electromyographical correlates of inner speech
title_full Inner experience differs in rumination and distraction without a change in electromyographical correlates of inner speech
title_fullStr Inner experience differs in rumination and distraction without a change in electromyographical correlates of inner speech
title_full_unstemmed Inner experience differs in rumination and distraction without a change in electromyographical correlates of inner speech
title_short Inner experience differs in rumination and distraction without a change in electromyographical correlates of inner speech
title_sort inner experience differs in rumination and distraction without a change in electromyographical correlates of inner speech
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7489561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32925961
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238920
work_keys_str_mv AT moffattjamie innerexperiencediffersinruminationanddistractionwithoutachangeinelectromyographicalcorrelatesofinnerspeech
AT mitrengakajajulia innerexperiencediffersinruminationanddistractionwithoutachangeinelectromyographicalcorrelatesofinnerspeech
AT aldersondayben innerexperiencediffersinruminationanddistractionwithoutachangeinelectromyographicalcorrelatesofinnerspeech
AT moseleypeter innerexperiencediffersinruminationanddistractionwithoutachangeinelectromyographicalcorrelatesofinnerspeech
AT fernyhoughcharles innerexperiencediffersinruminationanddistractionwithoutachangeinelectromyographicalcorrelatesofinnerspeech