Cargando…
A comparative study for the rate of adverse outcomes in unilateral and bilateral abdominal flap breast reconstruction: A meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Adverse outcomes after unilateral vs bilateral breast reconstruction involve an unknown level of risk that warrants thorough investigation. METHODS: To address this research need, PubMed, Ovid, Medline, EMBASE, and Scopus databases were searched through systematically from January 1, 199...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7489626/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32925752 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000022096 |
_version_ | 1783581893621448704 |
---|---|
author | Cao, Zheming Cao, Jiri Pang, Xiaoyang Du, Wei Wu, Panfeng |
author_facet | Cao, Zheming Cao, Jiri Pang, Xiaoyang Du, Wei Wu, Panfeng |
author_sort | Cao, Zheming |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Adverse outcomes after unilateral vs bilateral breast reconstruction involve an unknown level of risk that warrants thorough investigation. METHODS: To address this research need, PubMed, Ovid, Medline, EMBASE, and Scopus databases were searched through systematically from January 1, 1990, to January 1, 2019 to retrieve the relevant studies on the risk of postoperative complications after unilateral vs bilateral abdominal flap breast reconstruction. According to the pre-designed inclusion criteria, available data were extracted from the relevant studies, and then analyzed comparatively in order to identify the relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) applying either a random or a fixed effects model. RESULTS: Eventually, 20 studies involving 8122 female subjects met the inclusion criteria. It was found that unilateral reconstruction involved a significantly higher risk of flap loss (RR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.21–2.00; P < .05) and fat necrosis (RR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.23–2.09; P < .05) compared to bilateral reconstruction, while bilateral reconstruction involved a greater risk of abdominal hernia/bulge (RR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.25–2.24; P < .05). The risk was found to be higher following bilateral free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (fTRAM) flaps in comparison with deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps (RR: 2.62, 95% CI: 1.33–5.15; P < .05). CONCLUSION: The risk of postoperative flap complications in unilateral breast reconstruction is significantly higher than that in bilateral reconstruction. Contrarily, the abdominal complications were significantly higher in the bilateral group vs the unilateral group. Meanwhile, the risk of abdominal hernia/bulge complication after bilateral breast reconstruction was significantly higher with fTRAM vs DIEP. Therefore, DIEP flaps are recommended in priority for bilateral breast reconstruction, unless specifically contraindicated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7489626 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74896262020-09-24 A comparative study for the rate of adverse outcomes in unilateral and bilateral abdominal flap breast reconstruction: A meta-analysis Cao, Zheming Cao, Jiri Pang, Xiaoyang Du, Wei Wu, Panfeng Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 BACKGROUND: Adverse outcomes after unilateral vs bilateral breast reconstruction involve an unknown level of risk that warrants thorough investigation. METHODS: To address this research need, PubMed, Ovid, Medline, EMBASE, and Scopus databases were searched through systematically from January 1, 1990, to January 1, 2019 to retrieve the relevant studies on the risk of postoperative complications after unilateral vs bilateral abdominal flap breast reconstruction. According to the pre-designed inclusion criteria, available data were extracted from the relevant studies, and then analyzed comparatively in order to identify the relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) applying either a random or a fixed effects model. RESULTS: Eventually, 20 studies involving 8122 female subjects met the inclusion criteria. It was found that unilateral reconstruction involved a significantly higher risk of flap loss (RR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.21–2.00; P < .05) and fat necrosis (RR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.23–2.09; P < .05) compared to bilateral reconstruction, while bilateral reconstruction involved a greater risk of abdominal hernia/bulge (RR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.25–2.24; P < .05). The risk was found to be higher following bilateral free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (fTRAM) flaps in comparison with deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps (RR: 2.62, 95% CI: 1.33–5.15; P < .05). CONCLUSION: The risk of postoperative flap complications in unilateral breast reconstruction is significantly higher than that in bilateral reconstruction. Contrarily, the abdominal complications were significantly higher in the bilateral group vs the unilateral group. Meanwhile, the risk of abdominal hernia/bulge complication after bilateral breast reconstruction was significantly higher with fTRAM vs DIEP. Therefore, DIEP flaps are recommended in priority for bilateral breast reconstruction, unless specifically contraindicated. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7489626/ /pubmed/32925752 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000022096 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 7100 Cao, Zheming Cao, Jiri Pang, Xiaoyang Du, Wei Wu, Panfeng A comparative study for the rate of adverse outcomes in unilateral and bilateral abdominal flap breast reconstruction: A meta-analysis |
title | A comparative study for the rate of adverse outcomes in unilateral and bilateral abdominal flap breast reconstruction: A meta-analysis |
title_full | A comparative study for the rate of adverse outcomes in unilateral and bilateral abdominal flap breast reconstruction: A meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | A comparative study for the rate of adverse outcomes in unilateral and bilateral abdominal flap breast reconstruction: A meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative study for the rate of adverse outcomes in unilateral and bilateral abdominal flap breast reconstruction: A meta-analysis |
title_short | A comparative study for the rate of adverse outcomes in unilateral and bilateral abdominal flap breast reconstruction: A meta-analysis |
title_sort | comparative study for the rate of adverse outcomes in unilateral and bilateral abdominal flap breast reconstruction: a meta-analysis |
topic | 7100 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7489626/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32925752 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000022096 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT caozheming acomparativestudyfortherateofadverseoutcomesinunilateralandbilateralabdominalflapbreastreconstructionametaanalysis AT caojiri acomparativestudyfortherateofadverseoutcomesinunilateralandbilateralabdominalflapbreastreconstructionametaanalysis AT pangxiaoyang acomparativestudyfortherateofadverseoutcomesinunilateralandbilateralabdominalflapbreastreconstructionametaanalysis AT duwei acomparativestudyfortherateofadverseoutcomesinunilateralandbilateralabdominalflapbreastreconstructionametaanalysis AT wupanfeng acomparativestudyfortherateofadverseoutcomesinunilateralandbilateralabdominalflapbreastreconstructionametaanalysis AT caozheming comparativestudyfortherateofadverseoutcomesinunilateralandbilateralabdominalflapbreastreconstructionametaanalysis AT caojiri comparativestudyfortherateofadverseoutcomesinunilateralandbilateralabdominalflapbreastreconstructionametaanalysis AT pangxiaoyang comparativestudyfortherateofadverseoutcomesinunilateralandbilateralabdominalflapbreastreconstructionametaanalysis AT duwei comparativestudyfortherateofadverseoutcomesinunilateralandbilateralabdominalflapbreastreconstructionametaanalysis AT wupanfeng comparativestudyfortherateofadverseoutcomesinunilateralandbilateralabdominalflapbreastreconstructionametaanalysis |