Cargando…

Diagnostic value of the enhancement intensity and enhancement pattern of CESM to benign and malignant breast lesions

This study aimed to improve the diagnostic accuracy of breast diseases by combining breast imaging–reporting and data system (BI–RADS) with the enhancement intensity and pattern of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) (this combination of BI–RADS and CESM was designated as BaC). BI–RADS was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chi, Xiaoxiao, Zhang, Lei, Xing, Dong, Gong, Peiyou, Chen, Qianqian, Lv, Yongbin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7489654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32925753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000022097
_version_ 1783581899685363712
author Chi, Xiaoxiao
Zhang, Lei
Xing, Dong
Gong, Peiyou
Chen, Qianqian
Lv, Yongbin
author_facet Chi, Xiaoxiao
Zhang, Lei
Xing, Dong
Gong, Peiyou
Chen, Qianqian
Lv, Yongbin
author_sort Chi, Xiaoxiao
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to improve the diagnostic accuracy of breast diseases by combining breast imaging–reporting and data system (BI–RADS) with the enhancement intensity and pattern of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) (this combination of BI–RADS and CESM was designated as BaC). BI–RADS was used to evaluate low-energy CESM images. Spearman nonparametric correlation analysis was performed to analyze the correlation between the enhancement intensity of CESM subtraction images and the pathological results. Odds ratio (OR) values were calculated to determine whether the enhancement pattern of CESM subtraction images is a risk factor for benign and malignant lesions. The diagnostic efficacies of BI–RADS, CESM, and BaC scores for benign and malignant breast diseases were analyzed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Lesions with a high enhancement intensity were more likely to be malignant than those with low enhancement intensity. Lesions with heterogeneous enhancement tended to be malignant, whereas those with homogeneous enhancement tended to be benign. No significant correlation was observed between ring enhancement and the benignity or malignancy of lesions. The area under the ROC curve of BaC was higher than that of BI–RADS or CESM, and the difference was statistically significant. The diagnostic efficacy of BI–RADS combined with CESM enhancement was superior to that of either method alone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7489654
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74896542020-09-24 Diagnostic value of the enhancement intensity and enhancement pattern of CESM to benign and malignant breast lesions Chi, Xiaoxiao Zhang, Lei Xing, Dong Gong, Peiyou Chen, Qianqian Lv, Yongbin Medicine (Baltimore) 6800 This study aimed to improve the diagnostic accuracy of breast diseases by combining breast imaging–reporting and data system (BI–RADS) with the enhancement intensity and pattern of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) (this combination of BI–RADS and CESM was designated as BaC). BI–RADS was used to evaluate low-energy CESM images. Spearman nonparametric correlation analysis was performed to analyze the correlation between the enhancement intensity of CESM subtraction images and the pathological results. Odds ratio (OR) values were calculated to determine whether the enhancement pattern of CESM subtraction images is a risk factor for benign and malignant lesions. The diagnostic efficacies of BI–RADS, CESM, and BaC scores for benign and malignant breast diseases were analyzed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Lesions with a high enhancement intensity were more likely to be malignant than those with low enhancement intensity. Lesions with heterogeneous enhancement tended to be malignant, whereas those with homogeneous enhancement tended to be benign. No significant correlation was observed between ring enhancement and the benignity or malignancy of lesions. The area under the ROC curve of BaC was higher than that of BI–RADS or CESM, and the difference was statistically significant. The diagnostic efficacy of BI–RADS combined with CESM enhancement was superior to that of either method alone. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7489654/ /pubmed/32925753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000022097 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle 6800
Chi, Xiaoxiao
Zhang, Lei
Xing, Dong
Gong, Peiyou
Chen, Qianqian
Lv, Yongbin
Diagnostic value of the enhancement intensity and enhancement pattern of CESM to benign and malignant breast lesions
title Diagnostic value of the enhancement intensity and enhancement pattern of CESM to benign and malignant breast lesions
title_full Diagnostic value of the enhancement intensity and enhancement pattern of CESM to benign and malignant breast lesions
title_fullStr Diagnostic value of the enhancement intensity and enhancement pattern of CESM to benign and malignant breast lesions
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic value of the enhancement intensity and enhancement pattern of CESM to benign and malignant breast lesions
title_short Diagnostic value of the enhancement intensity and enhancement pattern of CESM to benign and malignant breast lesions
title_sort diagnostic value of the enhancement intensity and enhancement pattern of cesm to benign and malignant breast lesions
topic 6800
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7489654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32925753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000022097
work_keys_str_mv AT chixiaoxiao diagnosticvalueoftheenhancementintensityandenhancementpatternofcesmtobenignandmalignantbreastlesions
AT zhanglei diagnosticvalueoftheenhancementintensityandenhancementpatternofcesmtobenignandmalignantbreastlesions
AT xingdong diagnosticvalueoftheenhancementintensityandenhancementpatternofcesmtobenignandmalignantbreastlesions
AT gongpeiyou diagnosticvalueoftheenhancementintensityandenhancementpatternofcesmtobenignandmalignantbreastlesions
AT chenqianqian diagnosticvalueoftheenhancementintensityandenhancementpatternofcesmtobenignandmalignantbreastlesions
AT lvyongbin diagnosticvalueoftheenhancementintensityandenhancementpatternofcesmtobenignandmalignantbreastlesions