Cargando…
Anti-IL5 Therapies for Severe Eosinophilic Asthma: Literature Review and Practical Insights
Severe refractory asthma (SRA) still has a high economic and social impact, including a reduction in quality of life (QoL), productivity, a greater risk of exacerbations and emergency department (ED) visits. Another major issue is the need of oral corticosteroids (OCS), often due to a poor response...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7490042/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32982318 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S258594 |
_version_ | 1783581967751577600 |
---|---|
author | Menzella, Francesco Ruggiero, Patrizia Ghidoni, Giulia Fontana, Matteo Bagnasco, Diego Livrieri, Francesco Scelfo, Chiara Facciolongo, Nicola |
author_facet | Menzella, Francesco Ruggiero, Patrizia Ghidoni, Giulia Fontana, Matteo Bagnasco, Diego Livrieri, Francesco Scelfo, Chiara Facciolongo, Nicola |
author_sort | Menzella, Francesco |
collection | PubMed |
description | Severe refractory asthma (SRA) still has a high economic and social impact, including a reduction in quality of life (QoL), productivity, a greater risk of exacerbations and emergency department (ED) visits. Another major issue is the need of oral corticosteroids (OCS), often due to a poor response to standard therapies or the lack of indication for currently available biological drugs. A thorough understanding of the immunological pathways and eosinophilopoietic processes allows a correct application of the new pharmacological strategies and leads to better clinical responses. For these unmet needs, several monoclonal antibody (mAb) drugs have been introduced over the past few years. These are mainly available for allergic and especially eosinophilic uncontrolled refractory asthma. As the number of therapeutic options increases, the choice of biological drugs can be made only after careful considerations of the particular asthma endotype, patients’ comorbidities and clinical data. The selection of the correct therapeutic option can therefore be guided after a careful evaluation of the particular endotype and phenotype, from the combined evaluation of inflammatory biomarkers, clinical picture and comorbidities. The careful evaluation of all these parameters can therefore help the physician in the optimal management of these complex patients, for whom it is often possible to achieve exceptional results by managing the available options in the best possible way. The aim of this review is to define the positioning of the biological drugs currently available for type 2 asthma, with a special focus on options for eosinophilic asthma in the context of the most recent knowledge of immunological pathways. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7490042 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74900422020-09-24 Anti-IL5 Therapies for Severe Eosinophilic Asthma: Literature Review and Practical Insights Menzella, Francesco Ruggiero, Patrizia Ghidoni, Giulia Fontana, Matteo Bagnasco, Diego Livrieri, Francesco Scelfo, Chiara Facciolongo, Nicola J Asthma Allergy Review Severe refractory asthma (SRA) still has a high economic and social impact, including a reduction in quality of life (QoL), productivity, a greater risk of exacerbations and emergency department (ED) visits. Another major issue is the need of oral corticosteroids (OCS), often due to a poor response to standard therapies or the lack of indication for currently available biological drugs. A thorough understanding of the immunological pathways and eosinophilopoietic processes allows a correct application of the new pharmacological strategies and leads to better clinical responses. For these unmet needs, several monoclonal antibody (mAb) drugs have been introduced over the past few years. These are mainly available for allergic and especially eosinophilic uncontrolled refractory asthma. As the number of therapeutic options increases, the choice of biological drugs can be made only after careful considerations of the particular asthma endotype, patients’ comorbidities and clinical data. The selection of the correct therapeutic option can therefore be guided after a careful evaluation of the particular endotype and phenotype, from the combined evaluation of inflammatory biomarkers, clinical picture and comorbidities. The careful evaluation of all these parameters can therefore help the physician in the optimal management of these complex patients, for whom it is often possible to achieve exceptional results by managing the available options in the best possible way. The aim of this review is to define the positioning of the biological drugs currently available for type 2 asthma, with a special focus on options for eosinophilic asthma in the context of the most recent knowledge of immunological pathways. Dove 2020-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7490042/ /pubmed/32982318 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S258594 Text en © 2020 Menzella et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Review Menzella, Francesco Ruggiero, Patrizia Ghidoni, Giulia Fontana, Matteo Bagnasco, Diego Livrieri, Francesco Scelfo, Chiara Facciolongo, Nicola Anti-IL5 Therapies for Severe Eosinophilic Asthma: Literature Review and Practical Insights |
title | Anti-IL5 Therapies for Severe Eosinophilic Asthma: Literature Review and Practical Insights |
title_full | Anti-IL5 Therapies for Severe Eosinophilic Asthma: Literature Review and Practical Insights |
title_fullStr | Anti-IL5 Therapies for Severe Eosinophilic Asthma: Literature Review and Practical Insights |
title_full_unstemmed | Anti-IL5 Therapies for Severe Eosinophilic Asthma: Literature Review and Practical Insights |
title_short | Anti-IL5 Therapies for Severe Eosinophilic Asthma: Literature Review and Practical Insights |
title_sort | anti-il5 therapies for severe eosinophilic asthma: literature review and practical insights |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7490042/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32982318 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S258594 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT menzellafrancesco antiil5therapiesforsevereeosinophilicasthmaliteraturereviewandpracticalinsights AT ruggieropatrizia antiil5therapiesforsevereeosinophilicasthmaliteraturereviewandpracticalinsights AT ghidonigiulia antiil5therapiesforsevereeosinophilicasthmaliteraturereviewandpracticalinsights AT fontanamatteo antiil5therapiesforsevereeosinophilicasthmaliteraturereviewandpracticalinsights AT bagnascodiego antiil5therapiesforsevereeosinophilicasthmaliteraturereviewandpracticalinsights AT livrierifrancesco antiil5therapiesforsevereeosinophilicasthmaliteraturereviewandpracticalinsights AT scelfochiara antiil5therapiesforsevereeosinophilicasthmaliteraturereviewandpracticalinsights AT facciolongonicola antiil5therapiesforsevereeosinophilicasthmaliteraturereviewandpracticalinsights |