Cargando…

Anti-IL5 Therapies for Severe Eosinophilic Asthma: Literature Review and Practical Insights

Severe refractory asthma (SRA) still has a high economic and social impact, including a reduction in quality of life (QoL), productivity, a greater risk of exacerbations and emergency department (ED) visits. Another major issue is the need of oral corticosteroids (OCS), often due to a poor response...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Menzella, Francesco, Ruggiero, Patrizia, Ghidoni, Giulia, Fontana, Matteo, Bagnasco, Diego, Livrieri, Francesco, Scelfo, Chiara, Facciolongo, Nicola
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7490042/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32982318
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S258594
_version_ 1783581967751577600
author Menzella, Francesco
Ruggiero, Patrizia
Ghidoni, Giulia
Fontana, Matteo
Bagnasco, Diego
Livrieri, Francesco
Scelfo, Chiara
Facciolongo, Nicola
author_facet Menzella, Francesco
Ruggiero, Patrizia
Ghidoni, Giulia
Fontana, Matteo
Bagnasco, Diego
Livrieri, Francesco
Scelfo, Chiara
Facciolongo, Nicola
author_sort Menzella, Francesco
collection PubMed
description Severe refractory asthma (SRA) still has a high economic and social impact, including a reduction in quality of life (QoL), productivity, a greater risk of exacerbations and emergency department (ED) visits. Another major issue is the need of oral corticosteroids (OCS), often due to a poor response to standard therapies or the lack of indication for currently available biological drugs. A thorough understanding of the immunological pathways and eosinophilopoietic processes allows a correct application of the new pharmacological strategies and leads to better clinical responses. For these unmet needs, several monoclonal antibody (mAb) drugs have been introduced over the past few years. These are mainly available for allergic and especially eosinophilic uncontrolled refractory asthma. As the number of therapeutic options increases, the choice of biological drugs can be made only after careful considerations of the particular asthma endotype, patients’ comorbidities and clinical data. The selection of the correct therapeutic option can therefore be guided after a careful evaluation of the particular endotype and phenotype, from the combined evaluation of inflammatory biomarkers, clinical picture and comorbidities. The careful evaluation of all these parameters can therefore help the physician in the optimal management of these complex patients, for whom it is often possible to achieve exceptional results by managing the available options in the best possible way. The aim of this review is to define the positioning of the biological drugs currently available for type 2 asthma, with a special focus on options for eosinophilic asthma in the context of the most recent knowledge of immunological pathways.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7490042
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74900422020-09-24 Anti-IL5 Therapies for Severe Eosinophilic Asthma: Literature Review and Practical Insights Menzella, Francesco Ruggiero, Patrizia Ghidoni, Giulia Fontana, Matteo Bagnasco, Diego Livrieri, Francesco Scelfo, Chiara Facciolongo, Nicola J Asthma Allergy Review Severe refractory asthma (SRA) still has a high economic and social impact, including a reduction in quality of life (QoL), productivity, a greater risk of exacerbations and emergency department (ED) visits. Another major issue is the need of oral corticosteroids (OCS), often due to a poor response to standard therapies or the lack of indication for currently available biological drugs. A thorough understanding of the immunological pathways and eosinophilopoietic processes allows a correct application of the new pharmacological strategies and leads to better clinical responses. For these unmet needs, several monoclonal antibody (mAb) drugs have been introduced over the past few years. These are mainly available for allergic and especially eosinophilic uncontrolled refractory asthma. As the number of therapeutic options increases, the choice of biological drugs can be made only after careful considerations of the particular asthma endotype, patients’ comorbidities and clinical data. The selection of the correct therapeutic option can therefore be guided after a careful evaluation of the particular endotype and phenotype, from the combined evaluation of inflammatory biomarkers, clinical picture and comorbidities. The careful evaluation of all these parameters can therefore help the physician in the optimal management of these complex patients, for whom it is often possible to achieve exceptional results by managing the available options in the best possible way. The aim of this review is to define the positioning of the biological drugs currently available for type 2 asthma, with a special focus on options for eosinophilic asthma in the context of the most recent knowledge of immunological pathways. Dove 2020-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7490042/ /pubmed/32982318 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S258594 Text en © 2020 Menzella et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Review
Menzella, Francesco
Ruggiero, Patrizia
Ghidoni, Giulia
Fontana, Matteo
Bagnasco, Diego
Livrieri, Francesco
Scelfo, Chiara
Facciolongo, Nicola
Anti-IL5 Therapies for Severe Eosinophilic Asthma: Literature Review and Practical Insights
title Anti-IL5 Therapies for Severe Eosinophilic Asthma: Literature Review and Practical Insights
title_full Anti-IL5 Therapies for Severe Eosinophilic Asthma: Literature Review and Practical Insights
title_fullStr Anti-IL5 Therapies for Severe Eosinophilic Asthma: Literature Review and Practical Insights
title_full_unstemmed Anti-IL5 Therapies for Severe Eosinophilic Asthma: Literature Review and Practical Insights
title_short Anti-IL5 Therapies for Severe Eosinophilic Asthma: Literature Review and Practical Insights
title_sort anti-il5 therapies for severe eosinophilic asthma: literature review and practical insights
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7490042/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32982318
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S258594
work_keys_str_mv AT menzellafrancesco antiil5therapiesforsevereeosinophilicasthmaliteraturereviewandpracticalinsights
AT ruggieropatrizia antiil5therapiesforsevereeosinophilicasthmaliteraturereviewandpracticalinsights
AT ghidonigiulia antiil5therapiesforsevereeosinophilicasthmaliteraturereviewandpracticalinsights
AT fontanamatteo antiil5therapiesforsevereeosinophilicasthmaliteraturereviewandpracticalinsights
AT bagnascodiego antiil5therapiesforsevereeosinophilicasthmaliteraturereviewandpracticalinsights
AT livrierifrancesco antiil5therapiesforsevereeosinophilicasthmaliteraturereviewandpracticalinsights
AT scelfochiara antiil5therapiesforsevereeosinophilicasthmaliteraturereviewandpracticalinsights
AT facciolongonicola antiil5therapiesforsevereeosinophilicasthmaliteraturereviewandpracticalinsights