Cargando…

Effect of Time Interval Between LEEP and Subsequent Hysterectomy on Postoperative Infectious Morbidity

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to provide insight into the effect of time interval between loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) and subsequent hysterectomy on postoperative infectious morbidity in cervical neoplasia patients. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, a total of 1172 medica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ni, Ting, Meng, Yaping, Li, Yuhong, Chen, Qinfang, Huang, Yong, Wang, Lihua, Qian, Xiaolei, Wang, Yudong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7490066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32982256
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S270590
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to provide insight into the effect of time interval between loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) and subsequent hysterectomy on postoperative infectious morbidity in cervical neoplasia patients. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, a total of 1172 medical records of patients who were diagnosed with high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (HSIL) or invasive cancer underwent a subsequent hysterectomy after LEEP at the International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital (IPMCH) in Shanghai, China from January 2008 to December 2019 were collected. The study outcome was postoperative infectious morbidity within 30 days after a hysterectomy. Overall and surgical approach specific effect of time interval on infectious morbidity was estimated using logistic regression in crude and adjusted models. RESULTS: There was an inverse association between time interval and postoperative infectious morbidity in HSIL or invasive cancer patients (OR=0.99, 95% CI: 0.98–1.00, p=0.0079). When trisecting time interval into three parts, the top tertile time interval (34–90 days) was also inversely associated with infectious morbidity compared with bottom tertile (0–16 days), independent of stage, surgical approach, operative time and estimated blood loss (OR=0.66,95% CI: 0.43–1.00, P=0.0487). A test for interaction between time interval and surgical approach on infectious morbidity was significant (P values for interaction= 0.0352). Longer time interval significantly reduced the risk of infectious morbidity in the laparoscopic group (OR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.17–0.78), while no statistically significant effects were observed in patients who underwent vaginal or open abdominal hysterectomy. CONCLUSION: The time interval and surgical approach can interactively affect the risk of postoperative infectious morbidity in cervical neoplasia patients who underwent a hysterectomy after LEEP. Our data suggest that compared with vaginal or open abdominal hysterectomy, laparoscopic hysterectomy required a longer time interval (34–90 days) to reduce the risk of infectious morbidity.