Cargando…

Revisiting the Drasdo Model: Implications for Structure-Function Analysis of the Macular Region

PURPOSE: To provide a consistent implementation of a retinal ganglion cell (RGC) displacement model proposed by Drasdo et al. for macular structure-function analysis, customizable by axial length (AL). METHODS: The effect of axial length on the shape of the inner retina was measured on 235 optical c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Montesano, Giovanni, Ometto, Giovanni, Hogg, Ruth E., Rossetti, Luca M., Garway-Heath, David F., Crabb, David P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7490226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32974087
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.10.15
_version_ 1783581997842563072
author Montesano, Giovanni
Ometto, Giovanni
Hogg, Ruth E.
Rossetti, Luca M.
Garway-Heath, David F.
Crabb, David P.
author_facet Montesano, Giovanni
Ometto, Giovanni
Hogg, Ruth E.
Rossetti, Luca M.
Garway-Heath, David F.
Crabb, David P.
author_sort Montesano, Giovanni
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To provide a consistent implementation of a retinal ganglion cell (RGC) displacement model proposed by Drasdo et al. for macular structure-function analysis, customizable by axial length (AL). METHODS: The effect of axial length on the shape of the inner retina was measured on 235 optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans from healthy eyes, to provide evidence for geometric scaling of structures with eye size. Following this assumption, we applied the Drasdo model to map perimetric stimuli on the radially displaced RGCs using two different methods: Method 1 only displaced the center of the stimuli; Method 2 applied the displacement to every point on the edge of the stimuli. We compared the accuracy of the two methods by calculating, for each stimulus, the number of expected RGC receptive fields and the number RGCs calculated from the histology map, expected to be equivalent. The same calculation was repeated on RGC density maps derived from 28 OCT scans from 28 young healthy subjects (age < 40 years) to confirm our results on clinically available measurements. RESULTS: The size of the retinal structures significantly increased with AL (P < 0.001) and was well predicted by geometric scaling. Method 1 systematically underestimated the RGC counts by as much as 60%. No bias was observed with Method 2. CONCLUSIONS: The Drasdo model can effectively account for AL assuming geometric scaling. Method 2 should be used for structure-function analyses. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: We developed a free web App in Shiny R to make our results available for researchers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7490226
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74902262020-09-23 Revisiting the Drasdo Model: Implications for Structure-Function Analysis of the Macular Region Montesano, Giovanni Ometto, Giovanni Hogg, Ruth E. Rossetti, Luca M. Garway-Heath, David F. Crabb, David P. Transl Vis Sci Technol Article PURPOSE: To provide a consistent implementation of a retinal ganglion cell (RGC) displacement model proposed by Drasdo et al. for macular structure-function analysis, customizable by axial length (AL). METHODS: The effect of axial length on the shape of the inner retina was measured on 235 optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans from healthy eyes, to provide evidence for geometric scaling of structures with eye size. Following this assumption, we applied the Drasdo model to map perimetric stimuli on the radially displaced RGCs using two different methods: Method 1 only displaced the center of the stimuli; Method 2 applied the displacement to every point on the edge of the stimuli. We compared the accuracy of the two methods by calculating, for each stimulus, the number of expected RGC receptive fields and the number RGCs calculated from the histology map, expected to be equivalent. The same calculation was repeated on RGC density maps derived from 28 OCT scans from 28 young healthy subjects (age < 40 years) to confirm our results on clinically available measurements. RESULTS: The size of the retinal structures significantly increased with AL (P < 0.001) and was well predicted by geometric scaling. Method 1 systematically underestimated the RGC counts by as much as 60%. No bias was observed with Method 2. CONCLUSIONS: The Drasdo model can effectively account for AL assuming geometric scaling. Method 2 should be used for structure-function analyses. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: We developed a free web App in Shiny R to make our results available for researchers. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2020-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7490226/ /pubmed/32974087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.10.15 Text en Copyright 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Article
Montesano, Giovanni
Ometto, Giovanni
Hogg, Ruth E.
Rossetti, Luca M.
Garway-Heath, David F.
Crabb, David P.
Revisiting the Drasdo Model: Implications for Structure-Function Analysis of the Macular Region
title Revisiting the Drasdo Model: Implications for Structure-Function Analysis of the Macular Region
title_full Revisiting the Drasdo Model: Implications for Structure-Function Analysis of the Macular Region
title_fullStr Revisiting the Drasdo Model: Implications for Structure-Function Analysis of the Macular Region
title_full_unstemmed Revisiting the Drasdo Model: Implications for Structure-Function Analysis of the Macular Region
title_short Revisiting the Drasdo Model: Implications for Structure-Function Analysis of the Macular Region
title_sort revisiting the drasdo model: implications for structure-function analysis of the macular region
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7490226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32974087
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.10.15
work_keys_str_mv AT montesanogiovanni revisitingthedrasdomodelimplicationsforstructurefunctionanalysisofthemacularregion
AT omettogiovanni revisitingthedrasdomodelimplicationsforstructurefunctionanalysisofthemacularregion
AT hoggruthe revisitingthedrasdomodelimplicationsforstructurefunctionanalysisofthemacularregion
AT rossettilucam revisitingthedrasdomodelimplicationsforstructurefunctionanalysisofthemacularregion
AT garwayheathdavidf revisitingthedrasdomodelimplicationsforstructurefunctionanalysisofthemacularregion
AT crabbdavidp revisitingthedrasdomodelimplicationsforstructurefunctionanalysisofthemacularregion