Cargando…

Design and baseline data of a randomized trial comparing two methods for scaling-up an occupational sun protection intervention

BACKGROUND: Successful methods for scaling-up evidence-based programs are needed to prevent skin cancer among adults who work outdoors in the sun. METHODS: A randomized trial is being conducted comparing two methods of scaling-up the Sun Safe Workplaces (SSW) intervention. Departments of transportat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buller, David B., Buller, Mary Klein, Meenan, Richard, Cutter, Gary R., Berteletti, Julia, Eye, Rachel, Walkosz, Barbara J., Pagoto, Sherry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7490282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32942054
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2020.106147
_version_ 1783582009268895744
author Buller, David B.
Buller, Mary Klein
Meenan, Richard
Cutter, Gary R.
Berteletti, Julia
Eye, Rachel
Walkosz, Barbara J.
Pagoto, Sherry
author_facet Buller, David B.
Buller, Mary Klein
Meenan, Richard
Cutter, Gary R.
Berteletti, Julia
Eye, Rachel
Walkosz, Barbara J.
Pagoto, Sherry
author_sort Buller, David B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Successful methods for scaling-up evidence-based programs are needed to prevent skin cancer among adults who work outdoors in the sun. METHODS: A randomized trial is being conducted comparing two methods of scaling-up the Sun Safe Workplaces (SSW) intervention. Departments of transportation (DOTs) from 21 U.S. states are participating and their 138 regional districts were randomized following baseline assessment. In districts assigned to the in-person method (n = 46), project staff meets personally with managers, conducts trainings for employees, and provides printed materials. In districts assigned to the digital method (n = 92), project staff conduct these same activities virtually, using conferencing technology, online training, and electronic materials. Delivery of SSW in both groups was tailored to managers' readiness to adopt occupational sun safety. Posttesting will assess manager's support for and use of SSW and employees' sun safety. An economic evaluation will explore whether the method that uses digital technology results in lower implementation of SSW but is more cost-effective relative to the in-person method. RESULTS: The state DOTs range in size from 997 to 18,415 employees. At baseline, 1113 managers (49.0%) completed the pretest (91.5% male, 91.1% white, 19.77 years on the job, 66.5% worked outdoors; and 24.4% had high-risk skin types). They were generally supportive of occupational sun safety. A minority reported that the employer had a written policy, half reported training, and two-thirds, messaging on sun protection. CONCLUSIONS: Digital methods are available that may make scale-up of SSW cost-effective in a national distribution to nearly half of the state DOTs. Trial registration: The ClinicalTrials.gov registration number is NCT03278340.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7490282
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74902822020-09-15 Design and baseline data of a randomized trial comparing two methods for scaling-up an occupational sun protection intervention Buller, David B. Buller, Mary Klein Meenan, Richard Cutter, Gary R. Berteletti, Julia Eye, Rachel Walkosz, Barbara J. Pagoto, Sherry Contemp Clin Trials Article BACKGROUND: Successful methods for scaling-up evidence-based programs are needed to prevent skin cancer among adults who work outdoors in the sun. METHODS: A randomized trial is being conducted comparing two methods of scaling-up the Sun Safe Workplaces (SSW) intervention. Departments of transportation (DOTs) from 21 U.S. states are participating and their 138 regional districts were randomized following baseline assessment. In districts assigned to the in-person method (n = 46), project staff meets personally with managers, conducts trainings for employees, and provides printed materials. In districts assigned to the digital method (n = 92), project staff conduct these same activities virtually, using conferencing technology, online training, and electronic materials. Delivery of SSW in both groups was tailored to managers' readiness to adopt occupational sun safety. Posttesting will assess manager's support for and use of SSW and employees' sun safety. An economic evaluation will explore whether the method that uses digital technology results in lower implementation of SSW but is more cost-effective relative to the in-person method. RESULTS: The state DOTs range in size from 997 to 18,415 employees. At baseline, 1113 managers (49.0%) completed the pretest (91.5% male, 91.1% white, 19.77 years on the job, 66.5% worked outdoors; and 24.4% had high-risk skin types). They were generally supportive of occupational sun safety. A minority reported that the employer had a written policy, half reported training, and two-thirds, messaging on sun protection. CONCLUSIONS: Digital methods are available that may make scale-up of SSW cost-effective in a national distribution to nearly half of the state DOTs. Trial registration: The ClinicalTrials.gov registration number is NCT03278340. Elsevier Inc. 2020-10 2020-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7490282/ /pubmed/32942054 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2020.106147 Text en © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Buller, David B.
Buller, Mary Klein
Meenan, Richard
Cutter, Gary R.
Berteletti, Julia
Eye, Rachel
Walkosz, Barbara J.
Pagoto, Sherry
Design and baseline data of a randomized trial comparing two methods for scaling-up an occupational sun protection intervention
title Design and baseline data of a randomized trial comparing two methods for scaling-up an occupational sun protection intervention
title_full Design and baseline data of a randomized trial comparing two methods for scaling-up an occupational sun protection intervention
title_fullStr Design and baseline data of a randomized trial comparing two methods for scaling-up an occupational sun protection intervention
title_full_unstemmed Design and baseline data of a randomized trial comparing two methods for scaling-up an occupational sun protection intervention
title_short Design and baseline data of a randomized trial comparing two methods for scaling-up an occupational sun protection intervention
title_sort design and baseline data of a randomized trial comparing two methods for scaling-up an occupational sun protection intervention
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7490282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32942054
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2020.106147
work_keys_str_mv AT bullerdavidb designandbaselinedataofarandomizedtrialcomparingtwomethodsforscalingupanoccupationalsunprotectionintervention
AT bullermaryklein designandbaselinedataofarandomizedtrialcomparingtwomethodsforscalingupanoccupationalsunprotectionintervention
AT meenanrichard designandbaselinedataofarandomizedtrialcomparingtwomethodsforscalingupanoccupationalsunprotectionintervention
AT cuttergaryr designandbaselinedataofarandomizedtrialcomparingtwomethodsforscalingupanoccupationalsunprotectionintervention
AT bertelettijulia designandbaselinedataofarandomizedtrialcomparingtwomethodsforscalingupanoccupationalsunprotectionintervention
AT eyerachel designandbaselinedataofarandomizedtrialcomparingtwomethodsforscalingupanoccupationalsunprotectionintervention
AT walkoszbarbaraj designandbaselinedataofarandomizedtrialcomparingtwomethodsforscalingupanoccupationalsunprotectionintervention
AT pagotosherry designandbaselinedataofarandomizedtrialcomparingtwomethodsforscalingupanoccupationalsunprotectionintervention