Cargando…

Error propagation analysis of seven partial volume correction algorithms for [(18)F]THK-5351 brain PET imaging

BACKGROUND: Novel partial volume correction (PVC) algorithms have been validated by assuming ideal conditions of image processing; however, in real clinical PET studies, the input datasets include error sources which cause error propagation to the corrected outcome. METHODS: We aimed to evaluate err...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oyama, Senri, Hosoi, Ayumu, Ibaraki, Masanobu, McGinnity, Colm J., Matsubara, Keisuke, Watanuki, Shoichi, Watabe, Hiroshi, Tashiro, Manabu, Shidahara, Miho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7490288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32926222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-020-00324-9
_version_ 1783582010673987584
author Oyama, Senri
Hosoi, Ayumu
Ibaraki, Masanobu
McGinnity, Colm J.
Matsubara, Keisuke
Watanuki, Shoichi
Watabe, Hiroshi
Tashiro, Manabu
Shidahara, Miho
author_facet Oyama, Senri
Hosoi, Ayumu
Ibaraki, Masanobu
McGinnity, Colm J.
Matsubara, Keisuke
Watanuki, Shoichi
Watabe, Hiroshi
Tashiro, Manabu
Shidahara, Miho
author_sort Oyama, Senri
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Novel partial volume correction (PVC) algorithms have been validated by assuming ideal conditions of image processing; however, in real clinical PET studies, the input datasets include error sources which cause error propagation to the corrected outcome. METHODS: We aimed to evaluate error propagations of seven PVCs algorithms for brain PET imaging with [(18)F]THK-5351 and to discuss the reliability of those algorithms for clinical applications. In order to mimic brain PET imaging of [(18)F]THK-5351, pseudo-observed SUVR images for one healthy adult and one adult with Alzheimer’s disease were simulated from individual PET and MR images. The partial volume effect of pseudo-observed PET images were corrected by using Müller-Gärtner (MG), the geometric transfer matrix (GTM), Labbé (LABBE), regional voxel-based (RBV), iterative Yang (IY), structural functional synergy for resolution recovery (SFS-RR), and modified SFS-RR algorithms with incorporation of error sources in the datasets for PVC processing. Assumed error sources were mismatched FWHM, inaccurate image-registration, and incorrectly segmented anatomical volume. The degree of error propagations in ROI values was evaluated by percent differences (%diff) of PV-corrected SUVR against true SUVR. RESULTS: Uncorrected SUVRs were underestimated against true SUVRs (− 15.7 and − 53.7% in hippocampus for HC and AD conditions), and application of each PVC algorithm reduced the %diff. Larger FWHM mismatch led to larger %diff of PVC-SUVRs against true SUVRs for all algorithms. Inaccurate image registration showed systematic propagation for most algorithms except for SFS-RR and modified SFS-RR. Incorrect segmentation of the anatomical volume only resulted in error propagations in limited local regions. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated error propagation by numerical simulation of THK-PET imaging. Error propagations of 7 PVC algorithms for brain PET imaging with [(18)F]THK-5351 were significant. Robust algorithms for clinical applications must be carefully selected according to the study design of clinical PET data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7490288
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74902882020-09-24 Error propagation analysis of seven partial volume correction algorithms for [(18)F]THK-5351 brain PET imaging Oyama, Senri Hosoi, Ayumu Ibaraki, Masanobu McGinnity, Colm J. Matsubara, Keisuke Watanuki, Shoichi Watabe, Hiroshi Tashiro, Manabu Shidahara, Miho EJNMMI Phys Original Research BACKGROUND: Novel partial volume correction (PVC) algorithms have been validated by assuming ideal conditions of image processing; however, in real clinical PET studies, the input datasets include error sources which cause error propagation to the corrected outcome. METHODS: We aimed to evaluate error propagations of seven PVCs algorithms for brain PET imaging with [(18)F]THK-5351 and to discuss the reliability of those algorithms for clinical applications. In order to mimic brain PET imaging of [(18)F]THK-5351, pseudo-observed SUVR images for one healthy adult and one adult with Alzheimer’s disease were simulated from individual PET and MR images. The partial volume effect of pseudo-observed PET images were corrected by using Müller-Gärtner (MG), the geometric transfer matrix (GTM), Labbé (LABBE), regional voxel-based (RBV), iterative Yang (IY), structural functional synergy for resolution recovery (SFS-RR), and modified SFS-RR algorithms with incorporation of error sources in the datasets for PVC processing. Assumed error sources were mismatched FWHM, inaccurate image-registration, and incorrectly segmented anatomical volume. The degree of error propagations in ROI values was evaluated by percent differences (%diff) of PV-corrected SUVR against true SUVR. RESULTS: Uncorrected SUVRs were underestimated against true SUVRs (− 15.7 and − 53.7% in hippocampus for HC and AD conditions), and application of each PVC algorithm reduced the %diff. Larger FWHM mismatch led to larger %diff of PVC-SUVRs against true SUVRs for all algorithms. Inaccurate image registration showed systematic propagation for most algorithms except for SFS-RR and modified SFS-RR. Incorrect segmentation of the anatomical volume only resulted in error propagations in limited local regions. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated error propagation by numerical simulation of THK-PET imaging. Error propagations of 7 PVC algorithms for brain PET imaging with [(18)F]THK-5351 were significant. Robust algorithms for clinical applications must be carefully selected according to the study design of clinical PET data. Springer International Publishing 2020-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7490288/ /pubmed/32926222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-020-00324-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Oyama, Senri
Hosoi, Ayumu
Ibaraki, Masanobu
McGinnity, Colm J.
Matsubara, Keisuke
Watanuki, Shoichi
Watabe, Hiroshi
Tashiro, Manabu
Shidahara, Miho
Error propagation analysis of seven partial volume correction algorithms for [(18)F]THK-5351 brain PET imaging
title Error propagation analysis of seven partial volume correction algorithms for [(18)F]THK-5351 brain PET imaging
title_full Error propagation analysis of seven partial volume correction algorithms for [(18)F]THK-5351 brain PET imaging
title_fullStr Error propagation analysis of seven partial volume correction algorithms for [(18)F]THK-5351 brain PET imaging
title_full_unstemmed Error propagation analysis of seven partial volume correction algorithms for [(18)F]THK-5351 brain PET imaging
title_short Error propagation analysis of seven partial volume correction algorithms for [(18)F]THK-5351 brain PET imaging
title_sort error propagation analysis of seven partial volume correction algorithms for [(18)f]thk-5351 brain pet imaging
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7490288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32926222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-020-00324-9
work_keys_str_mv AT oyamasenri errorpropagationanalysisofsevenpartialvolumecorrectionalgorithmsfor18fthk5351brainpetimaging
AT hosoiayumu errorpropagationanalysisofsevenpartialvolumecorrectionalgorithmsfor18fthk5351brainpetimaging
AT ibarakimasanobu errorpropagationanalysisofsevenpartialvolumecorrectionalgorithmsfor18fthk5351brainpetimaging
AT mcginnitycolmj errorpropagationanalysisofsevenpartialvolumecorrectionalgorithmsfor18fthk5351brainpetimaging
AT matsubarakeisuke errorpropagationanalysisofsevenpartialvolumecorrectionalgorithmsfor18fthk5351brainpetimaging
AT watanukishoichi errorpropagationanalysisofsevenpartialvolumecorrectionalgorithmsfor18fthk5351brainpetimaging
AT watabehiroshi errorpropagationanalysisofsevenpartialvolumecorrectionalgorithmsfor18fthk5351brainpetimaging
AT tashiromanabu errorpropagationanalysisofsevenpartialvolumecorrectionalgorithmsfor18fthk5351brainpetimaging
AT shidaharamiho errorpropagationanalysisofsevenpartialvolumecorrectionalgorithmsfor18fthk5351brainpetimaging