Cargando…

The Few Who Made It: Commercially and Clinically Successful Innovative Bone Grafts

Bone reconstruction techniques are mainly based on the use of tissue grafts and artificial scaffolds. The former presents well-known limitations, such as restricted graft availability and donor site morbidity, while the latter commonly results in poor graft integration and fixation in the bone, whic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sallent, Ignacio, Capella-Monsonís, Héctor, Procter, Philip, Bozo, Ilia Y., Deev, Roman V., Zubov, Dimitri, Vasyliev, Roman, Perale, Giuseppe, Pertici, Gianni, Baker, Justin, Gingras, Peter, Bayon, Yves, Zeugolis, Dimitrios I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7490292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32984269
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00952
_version_ 1783582011143749632
author Sallent, Ignacio
Capella-Monsonís, Héctor
Procter, Philip
Bozo, Ilia Y.
Deev, Roman V.
Zubov, Dimitri
Vasyliev, Roman
Perale, Giuseppe
Pertici, Gianni
Baker, Justin
Gingras, Peter
Bayon, Yves
Zeugolis, Dimitrios I.
author_facet Sallent, Ignacio
Capella-Monsonís, Héctor
Procter, Philip
Bozo, Ilia Y.
Deev, Roman V.
Zubov, Dimitri
Vasyliev, Roman
Perale, Giuseppe
Pertici, Gianni
Baker, Justin
Gingras, Peter
Bayon, Yves
Zeugolis, Dimitrios I.
author_sort Sallent, Ignacio
collection PubMed
description Bone reconstruction techniques are mainly based on the use of tissue grafts and artificial scaffolds. The former presents well-known limitations, such as restricted graft availability and donor site morbidity, while the latter commonly results in poor graft integration and fixation in the bone, which leads to the unbalanced distribution of loads, impaired bone formation, increased pain perception, and risk of fracture, ultimately leading to recurrent surgeries. In the past decade, research efforts have been focused on the development of innovative bone substitutes that not only provide immediate mechanical support, but also ensure appropriate graft anchoring by, for example, promoting de novo bone tissue formation. From the countless studies that aimed in this direction, only few have made the big jump from the benchtop to the bedside, whilst most have perished along the challenging path of clinical translation. Herein, we describe some clinically successful cases of bone device development, including biological glues, stem cell-seeded scaffolds, and gene-functionalized bone substitutes. We also discuss the ventures that these technologies went through, the hindrances they faced and the common grounds among them, which might have been key for their success. The ultimate objective of this perspective article is to highlight the important aspects of the clinical translation of an innovative idea in the field of bone grafting, with the aim of commercially and clinically informing new research approaches in the sector.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7490292
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74902922020-09-25 The Few Who Made It: Commercially and Clinically Successful Innovative Bone Grafts Sallent, Ignacio Capella-Monsonís, Héctor Procter, Philip Bozo, Ilia Y. Deev, Roman V. Zubov, Dimitri Vasyliev, Roman Perale, Giuseppe Pertici, Gianni Baker, Justin Gingras, Peter Bayon, Yves Zeugolis, Dimitrios I. Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology Bone reconstruction techniques are mainly based on the use of tissue grafts and artificial scaffolds. The former presents well-known limitations, such as restricted graft availability and donor site morbidity, while the latter commonly results in poor graft integration and fixation in the bone, which leads to the unbalanced distribution of loads, impaired bone formation, increased pain perception, and risk of fracture, ultimately leading to recurrent surgeries. In the past decade, research efforts have been focused on the development of innovative bone substitutes that not only provide immediate mechanical support, but also ensure appropriate graft anchoring by, for example, promoting de novo bone tissue formation. From the countless studies that aimed in this direction, only few have made the big jump from the benchtop to the bedside, whilst most have perished along the challenging path of clinical translation. Herein, we describe some clinically successful cases of bone device development, including biological glues, stem cell-seeded scaffolds, and gene-functionalized bone substitutes. We also discuss the ventures that these technologies went through, the hindrances they faced and the common grounds among them, which might have been key for their success. The ultimate objective of this perspective article is to highlight the important aspects of the clinical translation of an innovative idea in the field of bone grafting, with the aim of commercially and clinically informing new research approaches in the sector. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7490292/ /pubmed/32984269 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00952 Text en Copyright © 2020 Sallent, Capella-Monsonís, Procter, Bozo, Deev, Zubov, Vasyliev, Perale, Pertici, Baker, Gingras, Bayon and Zeugolis. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Sallent, Ignacio
Capella-Monsonís, Héctor
Procter, Philip
Bozo, Ilia Y.
Deev, Roman V.
Zubov, Dimitri
Vasyliev, Roman
Perale, Giuseppe
Pertici, Gianni
Baker, Justin
Gingras, Peter
Bayon, Yves
Zeugolis, Dimitrios I.
The Few Who Made It: Commercially and Clinically Successful Innovative Bone Grafts
title The Few Who Made It: Commercially and Clinically Successful Innovative Bone Grafts
title_full The Few Who Made It: Commercially and Clinically Successful Innovative Bone Grafts
title_fullStr The Few Who Made It: Commercially and Clinically Successful Innovative Bone Grafts
title_full_unstemmed The Few Who Made It: Commercially and Clinically Successful Innovative Bone Grafts
title_short The Few Who Made It: Commercially and Clinically Successful Innovative Bone Grafts
title_sort few who made it: commercially and clinically successful innovative bone grafts
topic Bioengineering and Biotechnology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7490292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32984269
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00952
work_keys_str_mv AT sallentignacio thefewwhomadeitcommerciallyandclinicallysuccessfulinnovativebonegrafts
AT capellamonsonishector thefewwhomadeitcommerciallyandclinicallysuccessfulinnovativebonegrafts
AT procterphilip thefewwhomadeitcommerciallyandclinicallysuccessfulinnovativebonegrafts
AT bozoiliay thefewwhomadeitcommerciallyandclinicallysuccessfulinnovativebonegrafts
AT deevromanv thefewwhomadeitcommerciallyandclinicallysuccessfulinnovativebonegrafts
AT zubovdimitri thefewwhomadeitcommerciallyandclinicallysuccessfulinnovativebonegrafts
AT vasylievroman thefewwhomadeitcommerciallyandclinicallysuccessfulinnovativebonegrafts
AT peralegiuseppe thefewwhomadeitcommerciallyandclinicallysuccessfulinnovativebonegrafts
AT perticigianni thefewwhomadeitcommerciallyandclinicallysuccessfulinnovativebonegrafts
AT bakerjustin thefewwhomadeitcommerciallyandclinicallysuccessfulinnovativebonegrafts
AT gingraspeter thefewwhomadeitcommerciallyandclinicallysuccessfulinnovativebonegrafts
AT bayonyves thefewwhomadeitcommerciallyandclinicallysuccessfulinnovativebonegrafts
AT zeugolisdimitriosi thefewwhomadeitcommerciallyandclinicallysuccessfulinnovativebonegrafts
AT sallentignacio fewwhomadeitcommerciallyandclinicallysuccessfulinnovativebonegrafts
AT capellamonsonishector fewwhomadeitcommerciallyandclinicallysuccessfulinnovativebonegrafts
AT procterphilip fewwhomadeitcommerciallyandclinicallysuccessfulinnovativebonegrafts
AT bozoiliay fewwhomadeitcommerciallyandclinicallysuccessfulinnovativebonegrafts
AT deevromanv fewwhomadeitcommerciallyandclinicallysuccessfulinnovativebonegrafts
AT zubovdimitri fewwhomadeitcommerciallyandclinicallysuccessfulinnovativebonegrafts
AT vasylievroman fewwhomadeitcommerciallyandclinicallysuccessfulinnovativebonegrafts
AT peralegiuseppe fewwhomadeitcommerciallyandclinicallysuccessfulinnovativebonegrafts
AT perticigianni fewwhomadeitcommerciallyandclinicallysuccessfulinnovativebonegrafts
AT bakerjustin fewwhomadeitcommerciallyandclinicallysuccessfulinnovativebonegrafts
AT gingraspeter fewwhomadeitcommerciallyandclinicallysuccessfulinnovativebonegrafts
AT bayonyves fewwhomadeitcommerciallyandclinicallysuccessfulinnovativebonegrafts
AT zeugolisdimitriosi fewwhomadeitcommerciallyandclinicallysuccessfulinnovativebonegrafts