Cargando…
Noninvasive estimation of aortic hemodynamics and cardiac contractility using machine learning
Cardiac and aortic characteristics are crucial for cardiovascular disease detection. However, noninvasive estimation of aortic hemodynamics and cardiac contractility is still challenging. This paper investigated the potential of estimating aortic systolic pressure (aSBP), cardiac output (CO), and en...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7490416/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32929108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72147-8 |
_version_ | 1783582036870561792 |
---|---|
author | Bikia, Vasiliki Papaioannou, Theodore G. Pagoulatou, Stamatia Rovas, Georgios Oikonomou, Evangelos Siasos, Gerasimos Tousoulis, Dimitris Stergiopulos, Nikolaos |
author_facet | Bikia, Vasiliki Papaioannou, Theodore G. Pagoulatou, Stamatia Rovas, Georgios Oikonomou, Evangelos Siasos, Gerasimos Tousoulis, Dimitris Stergiopulos, Nikolaos |
author_sort | Bikia, Vasiliki |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cardiac and aortic characteristics are crucial for cardiovascular disease detection. However, noninvasive estimation of aortic hemodynamics and cardiac contractility is still challenging. This paper investigated the potential of estimating aortic systolic pressure (aSBP), cardiac output (CO), and end-systolic elastance (E(es)) from cuff-pressure and pulse wave velocity (PWV) using regression analysis. The importance of incorporating ejection fraction (EF) as additional input for estimating E(es) was also assessed. The models, including Random Forest, Support Vector Regressor, Ridge, Gradient Boosting, were trained/validated using synthetic data (n = 4,018) from an in-silico model. When cuff-pressure and PWV were used as inputs, the normalized-RMSEs/correlations for aSBP, CO, and E(es) (best-performing models) were 3.36 ± 0.74%/0.99, 7.60 ± 0.68%/0.96, and 16.96 ± 0.64%/0.37, respectively. Using EF as additional input for estimating E(es) significantly improved the predictions (7.00 ± 0.78%/0.92). Results showed that the use of noninvasive pressure measurements allows estimating aSBP and CO with acceptable accuracy. In contrast, E(es) cannot be predicted from pressure signals alone. Addition of the EF information greatly improves the estimated E(es). Accuracy of the model-derived aSBP compared to in-vivo aSBP (n = 783) was very satisfactory (5.26 ± 2.30%/0.97). Future in-vivo evaluation of CO and E(es) estimations remains to be conducted. This novel methodology has potential to improve the noninvasive monitoring of aortic hemodynamics and cardiac contractility. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7490416 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74904162020-09-16 Noninvasive estimation of aortic hemodynamics and cardiac contractility using machine learning Bikia, Vasiliki Papaioannou, Theodore G. Pagoulatou, Stamatia Rovas, Georgios Oikonomou, Evangelos Siasos, Gerasimos Tousoulis, Dimitris Stergiopulos, Nikolaos Sci Rep Article Cardiac and aortic characteristics are crucial for cardiovascular disease detection. However, noninvasive estimation of aortic hemodynamics and cardiac contractility is still challenging. This paper investigated the potential of estimating aortic systolic pressure (aSBP), cardiac output (CO), and end-systolic elastance (E(es)) from cuff-pressure and pulse wave velocity (PWV) using regression analysis. The importance of incorporating ejection fraction (EF) as additional input for estimating E(es) was also assessed. The models, including Random Forest, Support Vector Regressor, Ridge, Gradient Boosting, were trained/validated using synthetic data (n = 4,018) from an in-silico model. When cuff-pressure and PWV were used as inputs, the normalized-RMSEs/correlations for aSBP, CO, and E(es) (best-performing models) were 3.36 ± 0.74%/0.99, 7.60 ± 0.68%/0.96, and 16.96 ± 0.64%/0.37, respectively. Using EF as additional input for estimating E(es) significantly improved the predictions (7.00 ± 0.78%/0.92). Results showed that the use of noninvasive pressure measurements allows estimating aSBP and CO with acceptable accuracy. In contrast, E(es) cannot be predicted from pressure signals alone. Addition of the EF information greatly improves the estimated E(es). Accuracy of the model-derived aSBP compared to in-vivo aSBP (n = 783) was very satisfactory (5.26 ± 2.30%/0.97). Future in-vivo evaluation of CO and E(es) estimations remains to be conducted. This novel methodology has potential to improve the noninvasive monitoring of aortic hemodynamics and cardiac contractility. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7490416/ /pubmed/32929108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72147-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Bikia, Vasiliki Papaioannou, Theodore G. Pagoulatou, Stamatia Rovas, Georgios Oikonomou, Evangelos Siasos, Gerasimos Tousoulis, Dimitris Stergiopulos, Nikolaos Noninvasive estimation of aortic hemodynamics and cardiac contractility using machine learning |
title | Noninvasive estimation of aortic hemodynamics and cardiac contractility using machine learning |
title_full | Noninvasive estimation of aortic hemodynamics and cardiac contractility using machine learning |
title_fullStr | Noninvasive estimation of aortic hemodynamics and cardiac contractility using machine learning |
title_full_unstemmed | Noninvasive estimation of aortic hemodynamics and cardiac contractility using machine learning |
title_short | Noninvasive estimation of aortic hemodynamics and cardiac contractility using machine learning |
title_sort | noninvasive estimation of aortic hemodynamics and cardiac contractility using machine learning |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7490416/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32929108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72147-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bikiavasiliki noninvasiveestimationofaortichemodynamicsandcardiaccontractilityusingmachinelearning AT papaioannoutheodoreg noninvasiveestimationofaortichemodynamicsandcardiaccontractilityusingmachinelearning AT pagoulatoustamatia noninvasiveestimationofaortichemodynamicsandcardiaccontractilityusingmachinelearning AT rovasgeorgios noninvasiveestimationofaortichemodynamicsandcardiaccontractilityusingmachinelearning AT oikonomouevangelos noninvasiveestimationofaortichemodynamicsandcardiaccontractilityusingmachinelearning AT siasosgerasimos noninvasiveestimationofaortichemodynamicsandcardiaccontractilityusingmachinelearning AT tousoulisdimitris noninvasiveestimationofaortichemodynamicsandcardiaccontractilityusingmachinelearning AT stergiopulosnikolaos noninvasiveestimationofaortichemodynamicsandcardiaccontractilityusingmachinelearning |