Cargando…

Noninvasive estimation of aortic hemodynamics and cardiac contractility using machine learning

Cardiac and aortic characteristics are crucial for cardiovascular disease detection. However, noninvasive estimation of aortic hemodynamics and cardiac contractility is still challenging. This paper investigated the potential of estimating aortic systolic pressure (aSBP), cardiac output (CO), and en...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bikia, Vasiliki, Papaioannou, Theodore G., Pagoulatou, Stamatia, Rovas, Georgios, Oikonomou, Evangelos, Siasos, Gerasimos, Tousoulis, Dimitris, Stergiopulos, Nikolaos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7490416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32929108
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72147-8
_version_ 1783582036870561792
author Bikia, Vasiliki
Papaioannou, Theodore G.
Pagoulatou, Stamatia
Rovas, Georgios
Oikonomou, Evangelos
Siasos, Gerasimos
Tousoulis, Dimitris
Stergiopulos, Nikolaos
author_facet Bikia, Vasiliki
Papaioannou, Theodore G.
Pagoulatou, Stamatia
Rovas, Georgios
Oikonomou, Evangelos
Siasos, Gerasimos
Tousoulis, Dimitris
Stergiopulos, Nikolaos
author_sort Bikia, Vasiliki
collection PubMed
description Cardiac and aortic characteristics are crucial for cardiovascular disease detection. However, noninvasive estimation of aortic hemodynamics and cardiac contractility is still challenging. This paper investigated the potential of estimating aortic systolic pressure (aSBP), cardiac output (CO), and end-systolic elastance (E(es)) from cuff-pressure and pulse wave velocity (PWV) using regression analysis. The importance of incorporating ejection fraction (EF) as additional input for estimating E(es) was also assessed. The models, including Random Forest, Support Vector Regressor, Ridge, Gradient Boosting, were trained/validated using synthetic data (n = 4,018) from an in-silico model. When cuff-pressure and PWV were used as inputs, the normalized-RMSEs/correlations for aSBP, CO, and E(es) (best-performing models) were 3.36 ± 0.74%/0.99, 7.60 ± 0.68%/0.96, and 16.96 ± 0.64%/0.37, respectively. Using EF as additional input for estimating E(es) significantly improved the predictions (7.00 ± 0.78%/0.92). Results showed that the use of noninvasive pressure measurements allows estimating aSBP and CO with acceptable accuracy. In contrast, E(es) cannot be predicted from pressure signals alone. Addition of the EF information greatly improves the estimated E(es). Accuracy of the model-derived aSBP compared to in-vivo aSBP (n = 783) was very satisfactory (5.26 ± 2.30%/0.97). Future in-vivo evaluation of CO and E(es) estimations remains to be conducted. This novel methodology has potential to improve the noninvasive monitoring of aortic hemodynamics and cardiac contractility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7490416
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74904162020-09-16 Noninvasive estimation of aortic hemodynamics and cardiac contractility using machine learning Bikia, Vasiliki Papaioannou, Theodore G. Pagoulatou, Stamatia Rovas, Georgios Oikonomou, Evangelos Siasos, Gerasimos Tousoulis, Dimitris Stergiopulos, Nikolaos Sci Rep Article Cardiac and aortic characteristics are crucial for cardiovascular disease detection. However, noninvasive estimation of aortic hemodynamics and cardiac contractility is still challenging. This paper investigated the potential of estimating aortic systolic pressure (aSBP), cardiac output (CO), and end-systolic elastance (E(es)) from cuff-pressure and pulse wave velocity (PWV) using regression analysis. The importance of incorporating ejection fraction (EF) as additional input for estimating E(es) was also assessed. The models, including Random Forest, Support Vector Regressor, Ridge, Gradient Boosting, were trained/validated using synthetic data (n = 4,018) from an in-silico model. When cuff-pressure and PWV were used as inputs, the normalized-RMSEs/correlations for aSBP, CO, and E(es) (best-performing models) were 3.36 ± 0.74%/0.99, 7.60 ± 0.68%/0.96, and 16.96 ± 0.64%/0.37, respectively. Using EF as additional input for estimating E(es) significantly improved the predictions (7.00 ± 0.78%/0.92). Results showed that the use of noninvasive pressure measurements allows estimating aSBP and CO with acceptable accuracy. In contrast, E(es) cannot be predicted from pressure signals alone. Addition of the EF information greatly improves the estimated E(es). Accuracy of the model-derived aSBP compared to in-vivo aSBP (n = 783) was very satisfactory (5.26 ± 2.30%/0.97). Future in-vivo evaluation of CO and E(es) estimations remains to be conducted. This novel methodology has potential to improve the noninvasive monitoring of aortic hemodynamics and cardiac contractility. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7490416/ /pubmed/32929108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72147-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Bikia, Vasiliki
Papaioannou, Theodore G.
Pagoulatou, Stamatia
Rovas, Georgios
Oikonomou, Evangelos
Siasos, Gerasimos
Tousoulis, Dimitris
Stergiopulos, Nikolaos
Noninvasive estimation of aortic hemodynamics and cardiac contractility using machine learning
title Noninvasive estimation of aortic hemodynamics and cardiac contractility using machine learning
title_full Noninvasive estimation of aortic hemodynamics and cardiac contractility using machine learning
title_fullStr Noninvasive estimation of aortic hemodynamics and cardiac contractility using machine learning
title_full_unstemmed Noninvasive estimation of aortic hemodynamics and cardiac contractility using machine learning
title_short Noninvasive estimation of aortic hemodynamics and cardiac contractility using machine learning
title_sort noninvasive estimation of aortic hemodynamics and cardiac contractility using machine learning
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7490416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32929108
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72147-8
work_keys_str_mv AT bikiavasiliki noninvasiveestimationofaortichemodynamicsandcardiaccontractilityusingmachinelearning
AT papaioannoutheodoreg noninvasiveestimationofaortichemodynamicsandcardiaccontractilityusingmachinelearning
AT pagoulatoustamatia noninvasiveestimationofaortichemodynamicsandcardiaccontractilityusingmachinelearning
AT rovasgeorgios noninvasiveestimationofaortichemodynamicsandcardiaccontractilityusingmachinelearning
AT oikonomouevangelos noninvasiveestimationofaortichemodynamicsandcardiaccontractilityusingmachinelearning
AT siasosgerasimos noninvasiveestimationofaortichemodynamicsandcardiaccontractilityusingmachinelearning
AT tousoulisdimitris noninvasiveestimationofaortichemodynamicsandcardiaccontractilityusingmachinelearning
AT stergiopulosnikolaos noninvasiveestimationofaortichemodynamicsandcardiaccontractilityusingmachinelearning