Cargando…

Surgical Technique for Carotid Endarterectomy: Current Methods and Problems

Over the last 60 years, many reports have investigated carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and techniques have thus changed and improved. In this paper, we review the recent literature regarding operational maneuvers for CEA and discuss future problems for CEA. Longitudinal skin incision is common, but the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: UNO, Masaaki, TAKAI, Hiroki, YAGI, Kenji, MATSUBARA, Shunji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Japan Neurosurgical Society 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7490601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801277
http://dx.doi.org/10.2176/nmc.ra.2020-0111
_version_ 1783582068725252096
author UNO, Masaaki
TAKAI, Hiroki
YAGI, Kenji
MATSUBARA, Shunji
author_facet UNO, Masaaki
TAKAI, Hiroki
YAGI, Kenji
MATSUBARA, Shunji
author_sort UNO, Masaaki
collection PubMed
description Over the last 60 years, many reports have investigated carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and techniques have thus changed and improved. In this paper, we review the recent literature regarding operational maneuvers for CEA and discuss future problems for CEA. Longitudinal skin incision is common, but the transverse incision has been reported to offer minimal invasiveness and better cosmetic effects for CEA. Most surgeons currently use microscopy for dissection of the artery and plaque. Although no monitoring technique during CEA has been proven superior, multiple monitors offer better sensitivity for predicting postoperative neurological deficit. To date, data are lacking regarding whether routine shunt or selective shunt is better. Individual surgeons thus need to select the method with which they are more comfortable. Many surgical techniques have been reported to obtain distal control of the internal carotid artery in patients with high cervical carotid bifurcation or high plaque, and minimally invasive techniques should be considered. Multiple studies have shown that patch angioplasty reduces the risks of stroke and restenosis compared with primary closure, but few surgeons in Japan have been performing patch angioplasty. Most surgeons thus experience only a small volume of CEAs in Japan, so training programs and development of in vivo training models are important.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7490601
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Japan Neurosurgical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74906012020-09-21 Surgical Technique for Carotid Endarterectomy: Current Methods and Problems UNO, Masaaki TAKAI, Hiroki YAGI, Kenji MATSUBARA, Shunji Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) Review Article Over the last 60 years, many reports have investigated carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and techniques have thus changed and improved. In this paper, we review the recent literature regarding operational maneuvers for CEA and discuss future problems for CEA. Longitudinal skin incision is common, but the transverse incision has been reported to offer minimal invasiveness and better cosmetic effects for CEA. Most surgeons currently use microscopy for dissection of the artery and plaque. Although no monitoring technique during CEA has been proven superior, multiple monitors offer better sensitivity for predicting postoperative neurological deficit. To date, data are lacking regarding whether routine shunt or selective shunt is better. Individual surgeons thus need to select the method with which they are more comfortable. Many surgical techniques have been reported to obtain distal control of the internal carotid artery in patients with high cervical carotid bifurcation or high plaque, and minimally invasive techniques should be considered. Multiple studies have shown that patch angioplasty reduces the risks of stroke and restenosis compared with primary closure, but few surgeons in Japan have been performing patch angioplasty. Most surgeons thus experience only a small volume of CEAs in Japan, so training programs and development of in vivo training models are important. The Japan Neurosurgical Society 2020-09 2020-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7490601/ /pubmed/32801277 http://dx.doi.org/10.2176/nmc.ra.2020-0111 Text en © 2020 The Japan Neurosurgical Society This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Review Article
UNO, Masaaki
TAKAI, Hiroki
YAGI, Kenji
MATSUBARA, Shunji
Surgical Technique for Carotid Endarterectomy: Current Methods and Problems
title Surgical Technique for Carotid Endarterectomy: Current Methods and Problems
title_full Surgical Technique for Carotid Endarterectomy: Current Methods and Problems
title_fullStr Surgical Technique for Carotid Endarterectomy: Current Methods and Problems
title_full_unstemmed Surgical Technique for Carotid Endarterectomy: Current Methods and Problems
title_short Surgical Technique for Carotid Endarterectomy: Current Methods and Problems
title_sort surgical technique for carotid endarterectomy: current methods and problems
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7490601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801277
http://dx.doi.org/10.2176/nmc.ra.2020-0111
work_keys_str_mv AT unomasaaki surgicaltechniqueforcarotidendarterectomycurrentmethodsandproblems
AT takaihiroki surgicaltechniqueforcarotidendarterectomycurrentmethodsandproblems
AT yagikenji surgicaltechniqueforcarotidendarterectomycurrentmethodsandproblems
AT matsubarashunji surgicaltechniqueforcarotidendarterectomycurrentmethodsandproblems