Cargando…
Surgical Technique for Carotid Endarterectomy: Current Methods and Problems
Over the last 60 years, many reports have investigated carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and techniques have thus changed and improved. In this paper, we review the recent literature regarding operational maneuvers for CEA and discuss future problems for CEA. Longitudinal skin incision is common, but the...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Japan Neurosurgical Society
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7490601/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801277 http://dx.doi.org/10.2176/nmc.ra.2020-0111 |
_version_ | 1783582068725252096 |
---|---|
author | UNO, Masaaki TAKAI, Hiroki YAGI, Kenji MATSUBARA, Shunji |
author_facet | UNO, Masaaki TAKAI, Hiroki YAGI, Kenji MATSUBARA, Shunji |
author_sort | UNO, Masaaki |
collection | PubMed |
description | Over the last 60 years, many reports have investigated carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and techniques have thus changed and improved. In this paper, we review the recent literature regarding operational maneuvers for CEA and discuss future problems for CEA. Longitudinal skin incision is common, but the transverse incision has been reported to offer minimal invasiveness and better cosmetic effects for CEA. Most surgeons currently use microscopy for dissection of the artery and plaque. Although no monitoring technique during CEA has been proven superior, multiple monitors offer better sensitivity for predicting postoperative neurological deficit. To date, data are lacking regarding whether routine shunt or selective shunt is better. Individual surgeons thus need to select the method with which they are more comfortable. Many surgical techniques have been reported to obtain distal control of the internal carotid artery in patients with high cervical carotid bifurcation or high plaque, and minimally invasive techniques should be considered. Multiple studies have shown that patch angioplasty reduces the risks of stroke and restenosis compared with primary closure, but few surgeons in Japan have been performing patch angioplasty. Most surgeons thus experience only a small volume of CEAs in Japan, so training programs and development of in vivo training models are important. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7490601 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | The Japan Neurosurgical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74906012020-09-21 Surgical Technique for Carotid Endarterectomy: Current Methods and Problems UNO, Masaaki TAKAI, Hiroki YAGI, Kenji MATSUBARA, Shunji Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) Review Article Over the last 60 years, many reports have investigated carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and techniques have thus changed and improved. In this paper, we review the recent literature regarding operational maneuvers for CEA and discuss future problems for CEA. Longitudinal skin incision is common, but the transverse incision has been reported to offer minimal invasiveness and better cosmetic effects for CEA. Most surgeons currently use microscopy for dissection of the artery and plaque. Although no monitoring technique during CEA has been proven superior, multiple monitors offer better sensitivity for predicting postoperative neurological deficit. To date, data are lacking regarding whether routine shunt or selective shunt is better. Individual surgeons thus need to select the method with which they are more comfortable. Many surgical techniques have been reported to obtain distal control of the internal carotid artery in patients with high cervical carotid bifurcation or high plaque, and minimally invasive techniques should be considered. Multiple studies have shown that patch angioplasty reduces the risks of stroke and restenosis compared with primary closure, but few surgeons in Japan have been performing patch angioplasty. Most surgeons thus experience only a small volume of CEAs in Japan, so training programs and development of in vivo training models are important. The Japan Neurosurgical Society 2020-09 2020-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7490601/ /pubmed/32801277 http://dx.doi.org/10.2176/nmc.ra.2020-0111 Text en © 2020 The Japan Neurosurgical Society This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Review Article UNO, Masaaki TAKAI, Hiroki YAGI, Kenji MATSUBARA, Shunji Surgical Technique for Carotid Endarterectomy: Current Methods and Problems |
title | Surgical Technique for Carotid Endarterectomy: Current Methods and Problems |
title_full | Surgical Technique for Carotid Endarterectomy: Current Methods and Problems |
title_fullStr | Surgical Technique for Carotid Endarterectomy: Current Methods and Problems |
title_full_unstemmed | Surgical Technique for Carotid Endarterectomy: Current Methods and Problems |
title_short | Surgical Technique for Carotid Endarterectomy: Current Methods and Problems |
title_sort | surgical technique for carotid endarterectomy: current methods and problems |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7490601/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801277 http://dx.doi.org/10.2176/nmc.ra.2020-0111 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT unomasaaki surgicaltechniqueforcarotidendarterectomycurrentmethodsandproblems AT takaihiroki surgicaltechniqueforcarotidendarterectomycurrentmethodsandproblems AT yagikenji surgicaltechniqueforcarotidendarterectomycurrentmethodsandproblems AT matsubarashunji surgicaltechniqueforcarotidendarterectomycurrentmethodsandproblems |