Cargando…

The Influence of Cochlear Implant-Based Electric Stimulation on the Electrophysiological Characteristics of Cultured Spiral Ganglion Neurons

BACKGROUND: Cochlear implant-based electrical stimulation may be an important reason to induce the residual hearing loss after cochlear implantation. In our previous study, we found that charge-balanced biphasic electrical stimulation inhibited the neurite growth of spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs) an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shen, Na, Zhou, Lei, Lai, Bin, Li, Shufeng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7490630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32963515
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/3108490
_version_ 1783582071254417408
author Shen, Na
Zhou, Lei
Lai, Bin
Li, Shufeng
author_facet Shen, Na
Zhou, Lei
Lai, Bin
Li, Shufeng
author_sort Shen, Na
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cochlear implant-based electrical stimulation may be an important reason to induce the residual hearing loss after cochlear implantation. In our previous study, we found that charge-balanced biphasic electrical stimulation inhibited the neurite growth of spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs) and decreased Schwann cell density in vitro. In this study, we want to know whether cochlear implant-based electrical stimulation can induce the change of electrical activity in cultured SGNs. METHODS: Spiral ganglion neuron electrical stimulation in vitro model is established using the devices delivering cochlear implant-based electrical stimulation. After 48 h treatment by 50 μA or 100 μA electrical stimulation, the action potential (AP) and voltage depended calcium current (I(Ca)) of SGNs are recorded using whole-cell electrophysiological method. RESULTS: The results show that the I(Ca) of SGNs is decreased significantly in 50 μA and 100 μA electrical stimulation groups. The reversal potential of I(Ca) is nearly +80 mV in control SGN, but the reversal potential decreases to +50 mV in 50 μA and 100 μA electrical stimulation groups. Interestingly, the AP amplitude, the AP latency, and the AP duration of SGNs have no statistically significant differences in all three groups. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests cochlear implant-based electrical stimulation only significantly inhibit the I(Ca) of cultured SGNs but has no effect on the firing of AP, and the relation of I(Ca) inhibition and SGN damage induced by electrical stimulation and its mechanism needs to be further studied.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7490630
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74906302020-09-21 The Influence of Cochlear Implant-Based Electric Stimulation on the Electrophysiological Characteristics of Cultured Spiral Ganglion Neurons Shen, Na Zhou, Lei Lai, Bin Li, Shufeng Neural Plast Research Article BACKGROUND: Cochlear implant-based electrical stimulation may be an important reason to induce the residual hearing loss after cochlear implantation. In our previous study, we found that charge-balanced biphasic electrical stimulation inhibited the neurite growth of spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs) and decreased Schwann cell density in vitro. In this study, we want to know whether cochlear implant-based electrical stimulation can induce the change of electrical activity in cultured SGNs. METHODS: Spiral ganglion neuron electrical stimulation in vitro model is established using the devices delivering cochlear implant-based electrical stimulation. After 48 h treatment by 50 μA or 100 μA electrical stimulation, the action potential (AP) and voltage depended calcium current (I(Ca)) of SGNs are recorded using whole-cell electrophysiological method. RESULTS: The results show that the I(Ca) of SGNs is decreased significantly in 50 μA and 100 μA electrical stimulation groups. The reversal potential of I(Ca) is nearly +80 mV in control SGN, but the reversal potential decreases to +50 mV in 50 μA and 100 μA electrical stimulation groups. Interestingly, the AP amplitude, the AP latency, and the AP duration of SGNs have no statistically significant differences in all three groups. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests cochlear implant-based electrical stimulation only significantly inhibit the I(Ca) of cultured SGNs but has no effect on the firing of AP, and the relation of I(Ca) inhibition and SGN damage induced by electrical stimulation and its mechanism needs to be further studied. Hindawi 2020-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7490630/ /pubmed/32963515 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/3108490 Text en Copyright © 2020 Na Shen et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shen, Na
Zhou, Lei
Lai, Bin
Li, Shufeng
The Influence of Cochlear Implant-Based Electric Stimulation on the Electrophysiological Characteristics of Cultured Spiral Ganglion Neurons
title The Influence of Cochlear Implant-Based Electric Stimulation on the Electrophysiological Characteristics of Cultured Spiral Ganglion Neurons
title_full The Influence of Cochlear Implant-Based Electric Stimulation on the Electrophysiological Characteristics of Cultured Spiral Ganglion Neurons
title_fullStr The Influence of Cochlear Implant-Based Electric Stimulation on the Electrophysiological Characteristics of Cultured Spiral Ganglion Neurons
title_full_unstemmed The Influence of Cochlear Implant-Based Electric Stimulation on the Electrophysiological Characteristics of Cultured Spiral Ganglion Neurons
title_short The Influence of Cochlear Implant-Based Electric Stimulation on the Electrophysiological Characteristics of Cultured Spiral Ganglion Neurons
title_sort influence of cochlear implant-based electric stimulation on the electrophysiological characteristics of cultured spiral ganglion neurons
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7490630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32963515
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/3108490
work_keys_str_mv AT shenna theinfluenceofcochlearimplantbasedelectricstimulationontheelectrophysiologicalcharacteristicsofculturedspiralganglionneurons
AT zhoulei theinfluenceofcochlearimplantbasedelectricstimulationontheelectrophysiologicalcharacteristicsofculturedspiralganglionneurons
AT laibin theinfluenceofcochlearimplantbasedelectricstimulationontheelectrophysiologicalcharacteristicsofculturedspiralganglionneurons
AT lishufeng theinfluenceofcochlearimplantbasedelectricstimulationontheelectrophysiologicalcharacteristicsofculturedspiralganglionneurons
AT shenna influenceofcochlearimplantbasedelectricstimulationontheelectrophysiologicalcharacteristicsofculturedspiralganglionneurons
AT zhoulei influenceofcochlearimplantbasedelectricstimulationontheelectrophysiologicalcharacteristicsofculturedspiralganglionneurons
AT laibin influenceofcochlearimplantbasedelectricstimulationontheelectrophysiologicalcharacteristicsofculturedspiralganglionneurons
AT lishufeng influenceofcochlearimplantbasedelectricstimulationontheelectrophysiologicalcharacteristicsofculturedspiralganglionneurons