Cargando…

A randomized controlled trial evaluating the hemodynamic impact of ultrasound-guided great auricular nerve block in middle ear microsurgery

BACKGROUND: The peri-operative effectiveness of ultrasound-guided great auricular nerve block (GANB) in patients, especially in adult patients undergoing middle ear microsurgery remains unclear. We hypothesized that ultrasound-guided GANB would decrease the hemodynamic responsiveness to incision and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Jinsheng, Yuan, Kezhi, Zhou, Hongling, Li, Li, Wang, Guyan, Li, Tianzuo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7491143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32933470
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-01155-y
_version_ 1783582161680465920
author Liu, Jinsheng
Yuan, Kezhi
Zhou, Hongling
Li, Li
Wang, Guyan
Li, Tianzuo
author_facet Liu, Jinsheng
Yuan, Kezhi
Zhou, Hongling
Li, Li
Wang, Guyan
Li, Tianzuo
author_sort Liu, Jinsheng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The peri-operative effectiveness of ultrasound-guided great auricular nerve block (GANB) in patients, especially in adult patients undergoing middle ear microsurgery remains unclear. We hypothesized that ultrasound-guided GANB would decrease the hemodynamic responsiveness to incision and opioid consumption in middle ear microsurgery as well as the post-operative analgesia requirement. METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing middle ear microsurgery were randomized into two equal groups to receive either a GANB with 2 ml of 0.25% ropivacaine under ultrasound guidance (GANB group) or to receive a blank control intervention (without any performed injection) before general anesthesia inductions. The primary outcomes were hemodynamic changes of MAP (mean artery pressure) and HR (heart rate) to skin incision. The secondary endpoints were to determine the consumptions of propofol and remifentanil during the operation and the incidence of remedial analgesia 48 h post-operation to maintain VAS ≤ 3. RESULTS: The MAP post incision in GANB group was significantly lower than that in control group (GANB group 93.83 ± 11.72 mmHg vs. control group 100.87 ± 12.65 mmHg, P = 0.029). The increases for MAP and HR post incision were also lower in GANB group (∆MAP GANB group 11.90 ± 8.32 mmHg vs. control group 19.83 ± 10.37 mmHg, P = 0.002; ∆HR GANB group 3.67 ± 5.30 beat min(− 1) vs. control group 8.23 ± 8.56 beat min(− 1), P = 0.016). Remifentanil consumption was significantly decreased in GANB group (GANB group 401.55 ± 100.51 μg h(− 1) vs. control group 697.34 ± 215.45 μg h(− 1), P = 0.000). The incidence of remedial analgesia post-operation in GANB group (5/30) was significantly lower than that in control group (20/30, P = 0.000). CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided GANB decreases the hemodynamic responsiveness to incision and remifentanil consumption in middle ear microsurgery as well as the post-operative analgesia requirement. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was retrospectively registered at http://www.chictr.org.cn with the registration number of ChiCTR1800014333 on 6 January, 2018.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7491143
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74911432020-09-16 A randomized controlled trial evaluating the hemodynamic impact of ultrasound-guided great auricular nerve block in middle ear microsurgery Liu, Jinsheng Yuan, Kezhi Zhou, Hongling Li, Li Wang, Guyan Li, Tianzuo BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: The peri-operative effectiveness of ultrasound-guided great auricular nerve block (GANB) in patients, especially in adult patients undergoing middle ear microsurgery remains unclear. We hypothesized that ultrasound-guided GANB would decrease the hemodynamic responsiveness to incision and opioid consumption in middle ear microsurgery as well as the post-operative analgesia requirement. METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing middle ear microsurgery were randomized into two equal groups to receive either a GANB with 2 ml of 0.25% ropivacaine under ultrasound guidance (GANB group) or to receive a blank control intervention (without any performed injection) before general anesthesia inductions. The primary outcomes were hemodynamic changes of MAP (mean artery pressure) and HR (heart rate) to skin incision. The secondary endpoints were to determine the consumptions of propofol and remifentanil during the operation and the incidence of remedial analgesia 48 h post-operation to maintain VAS ≤ 3. RESULTS: The MAP post incision in GANB group was significantly lower than that in control group (GANB group 93.83 ± 11.72 mmHg vs. control group 100.87 ± 12.65 mmHg, P = 0.029). The increases for MAP and HR post incision were also lower in GANB group (∆MAP GANB group 11.90 ± 8.32 mmHg vs. control group 19.83 ± 10.37 mmHg, P = 0.002; ∆HR GANB group 3.67 ± 5.30 beat min(− 1) vs. control group 8.23 ± 8.56 beat min(− 1), P = 0.016). Remifentanil consumption was significantly decreased in GANB group (GANB group 401.55 ± 100.51 μg h(− 1) vs. control group 697.34 ± 215.45 μg h(− 1), P = 0.000). The incidence of remedial analgesia post-operation in GANB group (5/30) was significantly lower than that in control group (20/30, P = 0.000). CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided GANB decreases the hemodynamic responsiveness to incision and remifentanil consumption in middle ear microsurgery as well as the post-operative analgesia requirement. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was retrospectively registered at http://www.chictr.org.cn with the registration number of ChiCTR1800014333 on 6 January, 2018. BioMed Central 2020-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7491143/ /pubmed/32933470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-01155-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Liu, Jinsheng
Yuan, Kezhi
Zhou, Hongling
Li, Li
Wang, Guyan
Li, Tianzuo
A randomized controlled trial evaluating the hemodynamic impact of ultrasound-guided great auricular nerve block in middle ear microsurgery
title A randomized controlled trial evaluating the hemodynamic impact of ultrasound-guided great auricular nerve block in middle ear microsurgery
title_full A randomized controlled trial evaluating the hemodynamic impact of ultrasound-guided great auricular nerve block in middle ear microsurgery
title_fullStr A randomized controlled trial evaluating the hemodynamic impact of ultrasound-guided great auricular nerve block in middle ear microsurgery
title_full_unstemmed A randomized controlled trial evaluating the hemodynamic impact of ultrasound-guided great auricular nerve block in middle ear microsurgery
title_short A randomized controlled trial evaluating the hemodynamic impact of ultrasound-guided great auricular nerve block in middle ear microsurgery
title_sort randomized controlled trial evaluating the hemodynamic impact of ultrasound-guided great auricular nerve block in middle ear microsurgery
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7491143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32933470
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-01155-y
work_keys_str_mv AT liujinsheng arandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingthehemodynamicimpactofultrasoundguidedgreatauricularnerveblockinmiddleearmicrosurgery
AT yuankezhi arandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingthehemodynamicimpactofultrasoundguidedgreatauricularnerveblockinmiddleearmicrosurgery
AT zhouhongling arandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingthehemodynamicimpactofultrasoundguidedgreatauricularnerveblockinmiddleearmicrosurgery
AT lili arandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingthehemodynamicimpactofultrasoundguidedgreatauricularnerveblockinmiddleearmicrosurgery
AT wangguyan arandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingthehemodynamicimpactofultrasoundguidedgreatauricularnerveblockinmiddleearmicrosurgery
AT litianzuo arandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingthehemodynamicimpactofultrasoundguidedgreatauricularnerveblockinmiddleearmicrosurgery
AT liujinsheng randomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingthehemodynamicimpactofultrasoundguidedgreatauricularnerveblockinmiddleearmicrosurgery
AT yuankezhi randomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingthehemodynamicimpactofultrasoundguidedgreatauricularnerveblockinmiddleearmicrosurgery
AT zhouhongling randomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingthehemodynamicimpactofultrasoundguidedgreatauricularnerveblockinmiddleearmicrosurgery
AT lili randomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingthehemodynamicimpactofultrasoundguidedgreatauricularnerveblockinmiddleearmicrosurgery
AT wangguyan randomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingthehemodynamicimpactofultrasoundguidedgreatauricularnerveblockinmiddleearmicrosurgery
AT litianzuo randomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingthehemodynamicimpactofultrasoundguidedgreatauricularnerveblockinmiddleearmicrosurgery