Cargando…

Comparison of Strategies in Development and Manufacturing of Low Viscosity, Ultra-High Concentration Formulation for IgG1 Antibody

Monoclonal antibodies requiring higher doses for exerting therapeutic effect but having lower stability, are administered as dilute infusions, or as two (low concentration) injections both resulting in reduced patient compliance. Present research summarizes impact of manufacturing conditions on ultr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deokar, Vaibhav, Sharma, Alok, Mody, Rustom, Volety, Subrahmanyam M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Pharmacists Association®. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7491461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32946895
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xphs.2020.09.014
_version_ 1783582224664231936
author Deokar, Vaibhav
Sharma, Alok
Mody, Rustom
Volety, Subrahmanyam M.
author_facet Deokar, Vaibhav
Sharma, Alok
Mody, Rustom
Volety, Subrahmanyam M.
author_sort Deokar, Vaibhav
collection PubMed
description Monoclonal antibodies requiring higher doses for exerting therapeutic effect but having lower stability, are administered as dilute infusions, or as two (low concentration) injections both resulting in reduced patient compliance. Present research summarizes impact of manufacturing conditions on ultra-high concentration (≥150 mg/mL) IgG1 formulation, which can be administered as one subcutaneous injection. IgG1 was concentrated to ~200 mg/mL using tangential flow filtration (TFF). Alternatively, spray dried (SPD) and spray freeze dried (SFD) IgG1, was reconstituted in 30%v/v propylene glycol to form ultra-high concentration (~200 mg/mL) injectable formulation. Reconstituted, SPD and SFD IgG1 formulations, increased viscosity beyond an acceptable range for subcutaneous injections (<20 cP). Formulations developed by reconstitution of SPD IgG1, demonstrated increase in high and low molecular weight impurities, at accelerated and stressed conditions. Whereas, the stability data suggested reconstituted SFD IgG1 was comparable to control IgG1 formulation concentrated by TFF. Also, formulation of IgG1 diafiltered with proline using TFF, reduce viscosity from ~21.9 cP to ~11 cP at 25 °C and had better stability. Thus, conventional TFF technique stands to be one of the preferred methods for manufacturing of ultra-high concentration IgG1 formulations. Additionally, SFD could be an alternative method for long term storage of IgG1 in a dry powder state.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7491461
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher American Pharmacists Association®. Published by Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74914612020-09-16 Comparison of Strategies in Development and Manufacturing of Low Viscosity, Ultra-High Concentration Formulation for IgG1 Antibody Deokar, Vaibhav Sharma, Alok Mody, Rustom Volety, Subrahmanyam M. J Pharm Sci Research Article Monoclonal antibodies requiring higher doses for exerting therapeutic effect but having lower stability, are administered as dilute infusions, or as two (low concentration) injections both resulting in reduced patient compliance. Present research summarizes impact of manufacturing conditions on ultra-high concentration (≥150 mg/mL) IgG1 formulation, which can be administered as one subcutaneous injection. IgG1 was concentrated to ~200 mg/mL using tangential flow filtration (TFF). Alternatively, spray dried (SPD) and spray freeze dried (SFD) IgG1, was reconstituted in 30%v/v propylene glycol to form ultra-high concentration (~200 mg/mL) injectable formulation. Reconstituted, SPD and SFD IgG1 formulations, increased viscosity beyond an acceptable range for subcutaneous injections (<20 cP). Formulations developed by reconstitution of SPD IgG1, demonstrated increase in high and low molecular weight impurities, at accelerated and stressed conditions. Whereas, the stability data suggested reconstituted SFD IgG1 was comparable to control IgG1 formulation concentrated by TFF. Also, formulation of IgG1 diafiltered with proline using TFF, reduce viscosity from ~21.9 cP to ~11 cP at 25 °C and had better stability. Thus, conventional TFF technique stands to be one of the preferred methods for manufacturing of ultra-high concentration IgG1 formulations. Additionally, SFD could be an alternative method for long term storage of IgG1 in a dry powder state. American Pharmacists Association®. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2020-12 2020-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7491461/ /pubmed/32946895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xphs.2020.09.014 Text en © 2020 American Pharmacists Association®. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Research Article
Deokar, Vaibhav
Sharma, Alok
Mody, Rustom
Volety, Subrahmanyam M.
Comparison of Strategies in Development and Manufacturing of Low Viscosity, Ultra-High Concentration Formulation for IgG1 Antibody
title Comparison of Strategies in Development and Manufacturing of Low Viscosity, Ultra-High Concentration Formulation for IgG1 Antibody
title_full Comparison of Strategies in Development and Manufacturing of Low Viscosity, Ultra-High Concentration Formulation for IgG1 Antibody
title_fullStr Comparison of Strategies in Development and Manufacturing of Low Viscosity, Ultra-High Concentration Formulation for IgG1 Antibody
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Strategies in Development and Manufacturing of Low Viscosity, Ultra-High Concentration Formulation for IgG1 Antibody
title_short Comparison of Strategies in Development and Manufacturing of Low Viscosity, Ultra-High Concentration Formulation for IgG1 Antibody
title_sort comparison of strategies in development and manufacturing of low viscosity, ultra-high concentration formulation for igg1 antibody
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7491461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32946895
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xphs.2020.09.014
work_keys_str_mv AT deokarvaibhav comparisonofstrategiesindevelopmentandmanufacturingoflowviscosityultrahighconcentrationformulationforigg1antibody
AT sharmaalok comparisonofstrategiesindevelopmentandmanufacturingoflowviscosityultrahighconcentrationformulationforigg1antibody
AT modyrustom comparisonofstrategiesindevelopmentandmanufacturingoflowviscosityultrahighconcentrationformulationforigg1antibody
AT voletysubrahmanyamm comparisonofstrategiesindevelopmentandmanufacturingoflowviscosityultrahighconcentrationformulationforigg1antibody