Cargando…

The Results of Abdominopelvic Computed Tomography Interpreted via Remote Access for the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis

Introduction: Abdominal computed tomography (CT) is one of the imaging modalities for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AA). Today, CT scans can be interpreted via remote access called tele-radiology, besides conventional methods. The objective of this study was to evaluate the CT interpreted via...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Akalın, Çağrı, Sasani, Hadi, Ekmen, Nergis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7491699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32953291
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.9773
_version_ 1783582253888045056
author Akalın, Çağrı
Sasani, Hadi
Ekmen, Nergis
author_facet Akalın, Çağrı
Sasani, Hadi
Ekmen, Nergis
author_sort Akalın, Çağrı
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Abdominal computed tomography (CT) is one of the imaging modalities for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AA). Today, CT scans can be interpreted via remote access called tele-radiology, besides conventional methods. The objective of this study was to evaluate the CT interpreted via tele-radiology for diagnosing AA. Methods: In this retrospective study, a total of 679 patients, who were interpreted via tele-radiology of CT due to suspicion of AA, were evaluated. Age, gender, CT findings, pathology results and intra-operative diagnosis of those with normal CT results were analysed. A sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive values (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) of CT in the diagnosis of AA were calculated. Results: 520 patients who were operated with pre-diagnosed AA were found. Of those, 441 patients (84.8%) were diagnosed with AA according to CT reports, out of which 368 (83.4%) were positive (true-positive) and 73 (16.6%) were negative (false-positive) in terms of pathology results. In the remaining operated 79 patients with normal CT results, 58 (73.4%) were positive for AA and 21 (26.6%) (negative laparotomy) were negative for AA in terms of pathological examination. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV and NPV of CT in the diagnosis of AA were determined as 81.2%, 67.7%, 76.7%, 83.4% and 64.2%, respectively. Conclusion: The sensitivity and PPV rates were found similar in both conventional and tele-radiological methods. However, specificity, accuracy and NPV rates were determined lower than in literature. Additionally, the negative laparotomy rate was higher than the conventional method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7491699
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74916992020-09-17 The Results of Abdominopelvic Computed Tomography Interpreted via Remote Access for the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis Akalın, Çağrı Sasani, Hadi Ekmen, Nergis Cureus Radiology Introduction: Abdominal computed tomography (CT) is one of the imaging modalities for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AA). Today, CT scans can be interpreted via remote access called tele-radiology, besides conventional methods. The objective of this study was to evaluate the CT interpreted via tele-radiology for diagnosing AA. Methods: In this retrospective study, a total of 679 patients, who were interpreted via tele-radiology of CT due to suspicion of AA, were evaluated. Age, gender, CT findings, pathology results and intra-operative diagnosis of those with normal CT results were analysed. A sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive values (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) of CT in the diagnosis of AA were calculated. Results: 520 patients who were operated with pre-diagnosed AA were found. Of those, 441 patients (84.8%) were diagnosed with AA according to CT reports, out of which 368 (83.4%) were positive (true-positive) and 73 (16.6%) were negative (false-positive) in terms of pathology results. In the remaining operated 79 patients with normal CT results, 58 (73.4%) were positive for AA and 21 (26.6%) (negative laparotomy) were negative for AA in terms of pathological examination. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV and NPV of CT in the diagnosis of AA were determined as 81.2%, 67.7%, 76.7%, 83.4% and 64.2%, respectively. Conclusion: The sensitivity and PPV rates were found similar in both conventional and tele-radiological methods. However, specificity, accuracy and NPV rates were determined lower than in literature. Additionally, the negative laparotomy rate was higher than the conventional method. Cureus 2020-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7491699/ /pubmed/32953291 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.9773 Text en Copyright © 2020, Akalın et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Radiology
Akalın, Çağrı
Sasani, Hadi
Ekmen, Nergis
The Results of Abdominopelvic Computed Tomography Interpreted via Remote Access for the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis
title The Results of Abdominopelvic Computed Tomography Interpreted via Remote Access for the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis
title_full The Results of Abdominopelvic Computed Tomography Interpreted via Remote Access for the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis
title_fullStr The Results of Abdominopelvic Computed Tomography Interpreted via Remote Access for the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis
title_full_unstemmed The Results of Abdominopelvic Computed Tomography Interpreted via Remote Access for the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis
title_short The Results of Abdominopelvic Computed Tomography Interpreted via Remote Access for the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis
title_sort results of abdominopelvic computed tomography interpreted via remote access for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis
topic Radiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7491699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32953291
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.9773
work_keys_str_mv AT akalıncagrı theresultsofabdominopelviccomputedtomographyinterpretedviaremoteaccessforthediagnosisofacuteappendicitis
AT sasanihadi theresultsofabdominopelviccomputedtomographyinterpretedviaremoteaccessforthediagnosisofacuteappendicitis
AT ekmennergis theresultsofabdominopelviccomputedtomographyinterpretedviaremoteaccessforthediagnosisofacuteappendicitis
AT akalıncagrı resultsofabdominopelviccomputedtomographyinterpretedviaremoteaccessforthediagnosisofacuteappendicitis
AT sasanihadi resultsofabdominopelviccomputedtomographyinterpretedviaremoteaccessforthediagnosisofacuteappendicitis
AT ekmennergis resultsofabdominopelviccomputedtomographyinterpretedviaremoteaccessforthediagnosisofacuteappendicitis