Cargando…

The Agony of Choice? Preserved Affective Decision Making in Early Multiple Sclerosis

Background: Cognitive impairment (CI) is an early and frequent symptom of multiple sclerosis (MS). Likewise, affective symptoms (e.g., depression and anxiety) and alterations in the processing of emotional stimuli have been frequently reported. Thus, abilities that integrate affective and cognitive...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Landmeyer, Nils C., Dzionsko, Inga, Brockhoff, Laura, Wiendl, Heinz, Domes, Gregor, Bölte, Jens, Krämer, Julia, Meuth, Sven G., Johnen, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7492612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32982932
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00914
_version_ 1783582403927736320
author Landmeyer, Nils C.
Dzionsko, Inga
Brockhoff, Laura
Wiendl, Heinz
Domes, Gregor
Bölte, Jens
Krämer, Julia
Meuth, Sven G.
Johnen, Andreas
author_facet Landmeyer, Nils C.
Dzionsko, Inga
Brockhoff, Laura
Wiendl, Heinz
Domes, Gregor
Bölte, Jens
Krämer, Julia
Meuth, Sven G.
Johnen, Andreas
author_sort Landmeyer, Nils C.
collection PubMed
description Background: Cognitive impairment (CI) is an early and frequent symptom of multiple sclerosis (MS). Likewise, affective symptoms (e.g., depression and anxiety) and alterations in the processing of emotional stimuli have been frequently reported. Thus, abilities that integrate affective and cognitive processes such as decision making (DM) based on affective feedback are potentially valuable early diagnostic markers for MS. The available research on this topic, however, is still inconclusive and suffers from methodological issues. Methods: We compared DM ability in a clinically homogeneous cohort of 24 patients with early relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS) and 59 age-matched healthy controls (HCs). A modified version of the Iowa gambling task (IGT) allowed us to control for individual differences in search strategies during the risk exploration phase. Besides standard IGT measures (netscore, obtained play money, and learning index), we also examined reaction times and post-error slowing (PES) patterns as a proxy for abnormalities in the processing of affective feedback. Results: The performance of patients did not significantly deviate from HCs in any standard parameter of the modified IGT. Furthermore, although RRMS patients reacted significantly slower than HCs overall, we found similar patterns of PES in both groups, suggesting similarly efficient processing of affective feedback. Conclusion: We conclude that there is no specific deficit in affective feedback processing in early RRMS. Previous findings of IGT impairments in this patient group may thus not represent a genuine deficit in affective DM but rather be related to sample characteristics, general CI, and/or differences in individual search strategies. Future research should explore the potential influence of lesion volumes and locations on DM ability by employing brain imaging techniques.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7492612
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74926122020-09-25 The Agony of Choice? Preserved Affective Decision Making in Early Multiple Sclerosis Landmeyer, Nils C. Dzionsko, Inga Brockhoff, Laura Wiendl, Heinz Domes, Gregor Bölte, Jens Krämer, Julia Meuth, Sven G. Johnen, Andreas Front Neurol Neurology Background: Cognitive impairment (CI) is an early and frequent symptom of multiple sclerosis (MS). Likewise, affective symptoms (e.g., depression and anxiety) and alterations in the processing of emotional stimuli have been frequently reported. Thus, abilities that integrate affective and cognitive processes such as decision making (DM) based on affective feedback are potentially valuable early diagnostic markers for MS. The available research on this topic, however, is still inconclusive and suffers from methodological issues. Methods: We compared DM ability in a clinically homogeneous cohort of 24 patients with early relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS) and 59 age-matched healthy controls (HCs). A modified version of the Iowa gambling task (IGT) allowed us to control for individual differences in search strategies during the risk exploration phase. Besides standard IGT measures (netscore, obtained play money, and learning index), we also examined reaction times and post-error slowing (PES) patterns as a proxy for abnormalities in the processing of affective feedback. Results: The performance of patients did not significantly deviate from HCs in any standard parameter of the modified IGT. Furthermore, although RRMS patients reacted significantly slower than HCs overall, we found similar patterns of PES in both groups, suggesting similarly efficient processing of affective feedback. Conclusion: We conclude that there is no specific deficit in affective feedback processing in early RRMS. Previous findings of IGT impairments in this patient group may thus not represent a genuine deficit in affective DM but rather be related to sample characteristics, general CI, and/or differences in individual search strategies. Future research should explore the potential influence of lesion volumes and locations on DM ability by employing brain imaging techniques. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7492612/ /pubmed/32982932 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00914 Text en Copyright © 2020 Landmeyer, Dzionsko, Brockhoff, Wiendl, Domes, Bölte, Krämer, Meuth and Johnen. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Landmeyer, Nils C.
Dzionsko, Inga
Brockhoff, Laura
Wiendl, Heinz
Domes, Gregor
Bölte, Jens
Krämer, Julia
Meuth, Sven G.
Johnen, Andreas
The Agony of Choice? Preserved Affective Decision Making in Early Multiple Sclerosis
title The Agony of Choice? Preserved Affective Decision Making in Early Multiple Sclerosis
title_full The Agony of Choice? Preserved Affective Decision Making in Early Multiple Sclerosis
title_fullStr The Agony of Choice? Preserved Affective Decision Making in Early Multiple Sclerosis
title_full_unstemmed The Agony of Choice? Preserved Affective Decision Making in Early Multiple Sclerosis
title_short The Agony of Choice? Preserved Affective Decision Making in Early Multiple Sclerosis
title_sort agony of choice? preserved affective decision making in early multiple sclerosis
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7492612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32982932
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00914
work_keys_str_mv AT landmeyernilsc theagonyofchoicepreservedaffectivedecisionmakinginearlymultiplesclerosis
AT dzionskoinga theagonyofchoicepreservedaffectivedecisionmakinginearlymultiplesclerosis
AT brockhofflaura theagonyofchoicepreservedaffectivedecisionmakinginearlymultiplesclerosis
AT wiendlheinz theagonyofchoicepreservedaffectivedecisionmakinginearlymultiplesclerosis
AT domesgregor theagonyofchoicepreservedaffectivedecisionmakinginearlymultiplesclerosis
AT boltejens theagonyofchoicepreservedaffectivedecisionmakinginearlymultiplesclerosis
AT kramerjulia theagonyofchoicepreservedaffectivedecisionmakinginearlymultiplesclerosis
AT meuthsveng theagonyofchoicepreservedaffectivedecisionmakinginearlymultiplesclerosis
AT johnenandreas theagonyofchoicepreservedaffectivedecisionmakinginearlymultiplesclerosis
AT landmeyernilsc agonyofchoicepreservedaffectivedecisionmakinginearlymultiplesclerosis
AT dzionskoinga agonyofchoicepreservedaffectivedecisionmakinginearlymultiplesclerosis
AT brockhofflaura agonyofchoicepreservedaffectivedecisionmakinginearlymultiplesclerosis
AT wiendlheinz agonyofchoicepreservedaffectivedecisionmakinginearlymultiplesclerosis
AT domesgregor agonyofchoicepreservedaffectivedecisionmakinginearlymultiplesclerosis
AT boltejens agonyofchoicepreservedaffectivedecisionmakinginearlymultiplesclerosis
AT kramerjulia agonyofchoicepreservedaffectivedecisionmakinginearlymultiplesclerosis
AT meuthsveng agonyofchoicepreservedaffectivedecisionmakinginearlymultiplesclerosis
AT johnenandreas agonyofchoicepreservedaffectivedecisionmakinginearlymultiplesclerosis