Cargando…

Comparison of Profile Attractiveness between Class III Orthodontic Camouflage and Predictive Tracing of Orthognathic Surgery

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the profile attractiveness between orthodontic camouflage of the Class III malocclusion and the predictive tracing simulating orthognathic surgery evaluated by dentists and laypeople. Settings and sample population. The sample consisted of 21 patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bou Wadi, Mohamad Nagi, Freitas, Karina Maria Salvatore, Freitas, Daniel Salvatore, Cançado, Rodrigo Hermont, de Oliveira, Renata Cristina Gobbi, de Oliveira, Ricardo Cesar Gobbi, Janson, Guilherme, Valarelli, Fabricio Pinelli
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7492899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32963533
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/7083940
_version_ 1783582456580931584
author Bou Wadi, Mohamad Nagi
Freitas, Karina Maria Salvatore
Freitas, Daniel Salvatore
Cançado, Rodrigo Hermont
de Oliveira, Renata Cristina Gobbi
de Oliveira, Ricardo Cesar Gobbi
Janson, Guilherme
Valarelli, Fabricio Pinelli
author_facet Bou Wadi, Mohamad Nagi
Freitas, Karina Maria Salvatore
Freitas, Daniel Salvatore
Cançado, Rodrigo Hermont
de Oliveira, Renata Cristina Gobbi
de Oliveira, Ricardo Cesar Gobbi
Janson, Guilherme
Valarelli, Fabricio Pinelli
author_sort Bou Wadi, Mohamad Nagi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the profile attractiveness between orthodontic camouflage of the Class III malocclusion and the predictive tracing simulating orthognathic surgery evaluated by dentists and laypeople. Settings and sample population. The sample consisted of 21 patients (9 male; 12 female) with Class III malocclusion treated with orthodontic camouflage and Class III intermaxillary elastics. Material and Methods. The mean initial age of the patients was 24.38 years (SD 3.32), and the mean ANB angle was −1.91° (SD 0.83°). Patients presented skeletal Class III and normal growth patterns. Initial and final lateral cephalograms of each patient were used. The initial cephalogram was used to perform the treatment simulation of orthognathic surgery, and its silhouette was compared to the silhouette obtained from the final cephalogram after Class III orthodontic camouflage. A subjective analysis of profile attractiveness was performed by 47 laypeople and 60 dentists, with scores from 1 (less attractive) to 10 (most attractive). Mann–Whitney tests were used to compare profile attractiveness between the orthodontic treatment and the predictive tracing groups and between dentists and laypeople. RESULTS: The predictive tracing of orthognathic surgery showed to be statistically significantly more attractive (mean score 4.57, SD 2.47) than that of the Class III camouflage orthodontic treatment (mean score 4.22, SD 2.40), with a mean numerical but significant difference of 0.35 (SD 2.01) (P < 0.001). Laypeople were more critical than dentists in evaluating profile attractiveness, but numerical difference between the groups was also small. CONCLUSION: The profile silhouette of predictive tracing simulating orthognathic surgery showed to be more attractive than that of Class III camouflage orthodontic treatment; however, differences were small but statistically significant. Laypeople showed to be more critical than dentists.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7492899
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74928992020-09-21 Comparison of Profile Attractiveness between Class III Orthodontic Camouflage and Predictive Tracing of Orthognathic Surgery Bou Wadi, Mohamad Nagi Freitas, Karina Maria Salvatore Freitas, Daniel Salvatore Cançado, Rodrigo Hermont de Oliveira, Renata Cristina Gobbi de Oliveira, Ricardo Cesar Gobbi Janson, Guilherme Valarelli, Fabricio Pinelli Int J Dent Research Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the profile attractiveness between orthodontic camouflage of the Class III malocclusion and the predictive tracing simulating orthognathic surgery evaluated by dentists and laypeople. Settings and sample population. The sample consisted of 21 patients (9 male; 12 female) with Class III malocclusion treated with orthodontic camouflage and Class III intermaxillary elastics. Material and Methods. The mean initial age of the patients was 24.38 years (SD 3.32), and the mean ANB angle was −1.91° (SD 0.83°). Patients presented skeletal Class III and normal growth patterns. Initial and final lateral cephalograms of each patient were used. The initial cephalogram was used to perform the treatment simulation of orthognathic surgery, and its silhouette was compared to the silhouette obtained from the final cephalogram after Class III orthodontic camouflage. A subjective analysis of profile attractiveness was performed by 47 laypeople and 60 dentists, with scores from 1 (less attractive) to 10 (most attractive). Mann–Whitney tests were used to compare profile attractiveness between the orthodontic treatment and the predictive tracing groups and between dentists and laypeople. RESULTS: The predictive tracing of orthognathic surgery showed to be statistically significantly more attractive (mean score 4.57, SD 2.47) than that of the Class III camouflage orthodontic treatment (mean score 4.22, SD 2.40), with a mean numerical but significant difference of 0.35 (SD 2.01) (P < 0.001). Laypeople were more critical than dentists in evaluating profile attractiveness, but numerical difference between the groups was also small. CONCLUSION: The profile silhouette of predictive tracing simulating orthognathic surgery showed to be more attractive than that of Class III camouflage orthodontic treatment; however, differences were small but statistically significant. Laypeople showed to be more critical than dentists. Hindawi 2020-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7492899/ /pubmed/32963533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/7083940 Text en Copyright © 2020 Mohamad Nagi Bou Wadi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bou Wadi, Mohamad Nagi
Freitas, Karina Maria Salvatore
Freitas, Daniel Salvatore
Cançado, Rodrigo Hermont
de Oliveira, Renata Cristina Gobbi
de Oliveira, Ricardo Cesar Gobbi
Janson, Guilherme
Valarelli, Fabricio Pinelli
Comparison of Profile Attractiveness between Class III Orthodontic Camouflage and Predictive Tracing of Orthognathic Surgery
title Comparison of Profile Attractiveness between Class III Orthodontic Camouflage and Predictive Tracing of Orthognathic Surgery
title_full Comparison of Profile Attractiveness between Class III Orthodontic Camouflage and Predictive Tracing of Orthognathic Surgery
title_fullStr Comparison of Profile Attractiveness between Class III Orthodontic Camouflage and Predictive Tracing of Orthognathic Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Profile Attractiveness between Class III Orthodontic Camouflage and Predictive Tracing of Orthognathic Surgery
title_short Comparison of Profile Attractiveness between Class III Orthodontic Camouflage and Predictive Tracing of Orthognathic Surgery
title_sort comparison of profile attractiveness between class iii orthodontic camouflage and predictive tracing of orthognathic surgery
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7492899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32963533
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/7083940
work_keys_str_mv AT bouwadimohamadnagi comparisonofprofileattractivenessbetweenclassiiiorthodonticcamouflageandpredictivetracingoforthognathicsurgery
AT freitaskarinamariasalvatore comparisonofprofileattractivenessbetweenclassiiiorthodonticcamouflageandpredictivetracingoforthognathicsurgery
AT freitasdanielsalvatore comparisonofprofileattractivenessbetweenclassiiiorthodonticcamouflageandpredictivetracingoforthognathicsurgery
AT cancadorodrigohermont comparisonofprofileattractivenessbetweenclassiiiorthodonticcamouflageandpredictivetracingoforthognathicsurgery
AT deoliveirarenatacristinagobbi comparisonofprofileattractivenessbetweenclassiiiorthodonticcamouflageandpredictivetracingoforthognathicsurgery
AT deoliveiraricardocesargobbi comparisonofprofileattractivenessbetweenclassiiiorthodonticcamouflageandpredictivetracingoforthognathicsurgery
AT jansonguilherme comparisonofprofileattractivenessbetweenclassiiiorthodonticcamouflageandpredictivetracingoforthognathicsurgery
AT valarellifabriciopinelli comparisonofprofileattractivenessbetweenclassiiiorthodonticcamouflageandpredictivetracingoforthognathicsurgery