Cargando…

Examining fidelity in the INFORM trial: a complex team-based behavioral intervention

BACKGROUND: Fidelity in complex behavioral interventions is underexplored. This study examines the fidelity of the INFORM trial and explores the relationship between fidelity, study arm, and the trial’s primary outcome—care aide involvement in formal team communications about resident care. METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ginsburg, Liane R., Hoben, Matthias, Easterbrook, Adam, Andersen, Elizabeth, Anderson, Ruth A., Cranley, Lisa, Lanham, Holly J., Norton, Peter G., Weeks, Lori E., Estabrooks, Carole A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7493316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32938481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-01039-2
_version_ 1783582542734032896
author Ginsburg, Liane R.
Hoben, Matthias
Easterbrook, Adam
Andersen, Elizabeth
Anderson, Ruth A.
Cranley, Lisa
Lanham, Holly J.
Norton, Peter G.
Weeks, Lori E.
Estabrooks, Carole A.
author_facet Ginsburg, Liane R.
Hoben, Matthias
Easterbrook, Adam
Andersen, Elizabeth
Anderson, Ruth A.
Cranley, Lisa
Lanham, Holly J.
Norton, Peter G.
Weeks, Lori E.
Estabrooks, Carole A.
author_sort Ginsburg, Liane R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fidelity in complex behavioral interventions is underexplored. This study examines the fidelity of the INFORM trial and explores the relationship between fidelity, study arm, and the trial’s primary outcome—care aide involvement in formal team communications about resident care. METHODS: A concurrent process evaluation of implementation fidelity was conducted in 33 nursing homes in Western Canada (Alberta and British Columbia). Study participants were from 106 clinical care units clustered in 33 nursing homes randomized to the Basic and Enhanced-Assisted Feedback arms of the INFORM trial. RESULTS: Fidelity of the INFORM intervention was moderate to high, with fidelity delivery and receipt higher than fidelity enactment for both study arms. Higher enactment teams experienced a significantly larger improvement in formal team communications between baseline and follow-up than lower enactment teams (F(1, 70) = 4.27, p = .042). CONCLUSIONS: Overall fidelity enactment was associated with improvements in formal team communications, but the study arm was not. This suggests that the intensity with which an intervention is offered and delivered may be less important than the intensity with which intervention participants enact the core components of an intervention. Greater attention to fidelity assessment and publication of fidelity results through studies such as this one is critical to improving the utility of published trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7493316
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74933162020-09-16 Examining fidelity in the INFORM trial: a complex team-based behavioral intervention Ginsburg, Liane R. Hoben, Matthias Easterbrook, Adam Andersen, Elizabeth Anderson, Ruth A. Cranley, Lisa Lanham, Holly J. Norton, Peter G. Weeks, Lori E. Estabrooks, Carole A. Implement Sci Research BACKGROUND: Fidelity in complex behavioral interventions is underexplored. This study examines the fidelity of the INFORM trial and explores the relationship between fidelity, study arm, and the trial’s primary outcome—care aide involvement in formal team communications about resident care. METHODS: A concurrent process evaluation of implementation fidelity was conducted in 33 nursing homes in Western Canada (Alberta and British Columbia). Study participants were from 106 clinical care units clustered in 33 nursing homes randomized to the Basic and Enhanced-Assisted Feedback arms of the INFORM trial. RESULTS: Fidelity of the INFORM intervention was moderate to high, with fidelity delivery and receipt higher than fidelity enactment for both study arms. Higher enactment teams experienced a significantly larger improvement in formal team communications between baseline and follow-up than lower enactment teams (F(1, 70) = 4.27, p = .042). CONCLUSIONS: Overall fidelity enactment was associated with improvements in formal team communications, but the study arm was not. This suggests that the intensity with which an intervention is offered and delivered may be less important than the intensity with which intervention participants enact the core components of an intervention. Greater attention to fidelity assessment and publication of fidelity results through studies such as this one is critical to improving the utility of published trials. BioMed Central 2020-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7493316/ /pubmed/32938481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-01039-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Ginsburg, Liane R.
Hoben, Matthias
Easterbrook, Adam
Andersen, Elizabeth
Anderson, Ruth A.
Cranley, Lisa
Lanham, Holly J.
Norton, Peter G.
Weeks, Lori E.
Estabrooks, Carole A.
Examining fidelity in the INFORM trial: a complex team-based behavioral intervention
title Examining fidelity in the INFORM trial: a complex team-based behavioral intervention
title_full Examining fidelity in the INFORM trial: a complex team-based behavioral intervention
title_fullStr Examining fidelity in the INFORM trial: a complex team-based behavioral intervention
title_full_unstemmed Examining fidelity in the INFORM trial: a complex team-based behavioral intervention
title_short Examining fidelity in the INFORM trial: a complex team-based behavioral intervention
title_sort examining fidelity in the inform trial: a complex team-based behavioral intervention
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7493316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32938481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-01039-2
work_keys_str_mv AT ginsburglianer examiningfidelityintheinformtrialacomplexteambasedbehavioralintervention
AT hobenmatthias examiningfidelityintheinformtrialacomplexteambasedbehavioralintervention
AT easterbrookadam examiningfidelityintheinformtrialacomplexteambasedbehavioralintervention
AT andersenelizabeth examiningfidelityintheinformtrialacomplexteambasedbehavioralintervention
AT andersonrutha examiningfidelityintheinformtrialacomplexteambasedbehavioralintervention
AT cranleylisa examiningfidelityintheinformtrialacomplexteambasedbehavioralintervention
AT lanhamhollyj examiningfidelityintheinformtrialacomplexteambasedbehavioralintervention
AT nortonpeterg examiningfidelityintheinformtrialacomplexteambasedbehavioralintervention
AT weekslorie examiningfidelityintheinformtrialacomplexteambasedbehavioralintervention
AT estabrookscarolea examiningfidelityintheinformtrialacomplexteambasedbehavioralintervention