Cargando…

Stereotactic body radiotherapy versus conventional/moderate fractionated radiation therapy with androgen deprivation therapy for unfavorable risk prostate cancer

BACKGROUND: Ultrahypofractionation using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an increasingly utilized technique for men with prostate cancer (PC). The comparative efficacy of SBRT plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) compared to fractionated radiotherapy (EBRT) plus ADT in higher-risk prosta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patel, Sagar A., Switchenko, Jeffrey M., Fischer-Valuck, Ben, Zhang, Chao, Rose, Brent S., Chen, Ronald C., Jani, Ashesh B., Royce, Trevor J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7493337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32933541
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01658-5
_version_ 1783582547426410496
author Patel, Sagar A.
Switchenko, Jeffrey M.
Fischer-Valuck, Ben
Zhang, Chao
Rose, Brent S.
Chen, Ronald C.
Jani, Ashesh B.
Royce, Trevor J.
author_facet Patel, Sagar A.
Switchenko, Jeffrey M.
Fischer-Valuck, Ben
Zhang, Chao
Rose, Brent S.
Chen, Ronald C.
Jani, Ashesh B.
Royce, Trevor J.
author_sort Patel, Sagar A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ultrahypofractionation using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an increasingly utilized technique for men with prostate cancer (PC). The comparative efficacy of SBRT plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) compared to fractionated radiotherapy (EBRT) plus ADT in higher-risk prostate cancer is unknown. METHODS: Men > 40 years old with localized PC treated with external beam radiation and concomitant ADT for curative intent between 2004 and 2016 were analyzed from the National Cancer Database. Patients who lacked ADT or risk stratification data were excluded. 558 men treated with SBRT versus 40,797 men treated with conventional or moderately hypofractionated EBRT were included. Patients were stratified by unfavorable intermediate (UIR) and high (HR) risk using NCCN criteria. Kaplan Meier and Cox proportional hazards were used to compare overall survival (OS) between RT modality, adjusting for age, race, and comorbidity index. RESULTS: With a median follow up of 74 months, there was no difference in estimated 6-year OS between men treated with SBRT versus EBRT regardless of risk group. On multivariable analysis, there was no difference in risk of death for men treated with SBRT compared to EBRT (UIR: adjusted HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.68–1.74, p = .72; HR: adjusted HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.76–1.14, p = .51). On sensitivity analyses, when confining the cohort to men treated with NCCN-preferred dose fractionations, with no comorbidities, or < 65 years old, there remained no survival difference between treatment groups for both UIR and HR. CONCLUSION: Within study limitations, we found no difference in survival between SBRT+ADT and standard of care EBRT+ADT for UIR or HR PC. These results support recent NCCN guideline updates, which include SBRT as a non-preferred option for higher risk men. Prospective validation would further strengthen the evidence basis behind these recommendations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7493337
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74933372020-09-16 Stereotactic body radiotherapy versus conventional/moderate fractionated radiation therapy with androgen deprivation therapy for unfavorable risk prostate cancer Patel, Sagar A. Switchenko, Jeffrey M. Fischer-Valuck, Ben Zhang, Chao Rose, Brent S. Chen, Ronald C. Jani, Ashesh B. Royce, Trevor J. Radiat Oncol Short Report BACKGROUND: Ultrahypofractionation using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an increasingly utilized technique for men with prostate cancer (PC). The comparative efficacy of SBRT plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) compared to fractionated radiotherapy (EBRT) plus ADT in higher-risk prostate cancer is unknown. METHODS: Men > 40 years old with localized PC treated with external beam radiation and concomitant ADT for curative intent between 2004 and 2016 were analyzed from the National Cancer Database. Patients who lacked ADT or risk stratification data were excluded. 558 men treated with SBRT versus 40,797 men treated with conventional or moderately hypofractionated EBRT were included. Patients were stratified by unfavorable intermediate (UIR) and high (HR) risk using NCCN criteria. Kaplan Meier and Cox proportional hazards were used to compare overall survival (OS) between RT modality, adjusting for age, race, and comorbidity index. RESULTS: With a median follow up of 74 months, there was no difference in estimated 6-year OS between men treated with SBRT versus EBRT regardless of risk group. On multivariable analysis, there was no difference in risk of death for men treated with SBRT compared to EBRT (UIR: adjusted HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.68–1.74, p = .72; HR: adjusted HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.76–1.14, p = .51). On sensitivity analyses, when confining the cohort to men treated with NCCN-preferred dose fractionations, with no comorbidities, or < 65 years old, there remained no survival difference between treatment groups for both UIR and HR. CONCLUSION: Within study limitations, we found no difference in survival between SBRT+ADT and standard of care EBRT+ADT for UIR or HR PC. These results support recent NCCN guideline updates, which include SBRT as a non-preferred option for higher risk men. Prospective validation would further strengthen the evidence basis behind these recommendations. BioMed Central 2020-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7493337/ /pubmed/32933541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01658-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Short Report
Patel, Sagar A.
Switchenko, Jeffrey M.
Fischer-Valuck, Ben
Zhang, Chao
Rose, Brent S.
Chen, Ronald C.
Jani, Ashesh B.
Royce, Trevor J.
Stereotactic body radiotherapy versus conventional/moderate fractionated radiation therapy with androgen deprivation therapy for unfavorable risk prostate cancer
title Stereotactic body radiotherapy versus conventional/moderate fractionated radiation therapy with androgen deprivation therapy for unfavorable risk prostate cancer
title_full Stereotactic body radiotherapy versus conventional/moderate fractionated radiation therapy with androgen deprivation therapy for unfavorable risk prostate cancer
title_fullStr Stereotactic body radiotherapy versus conventional/moderate fractionated radiation therapy with androgen deprivation therapy for unfavorable risk prostate cancer
title_full_unstemmed Stereotactic body radiotherapy versus conventional/moderate fractionated radiation therapy with androgen deprivation therapy for unfavorable risk prostate cancer
title_short Stereotactic body radiotherapy versus conventional/moderate fractionated radiation therapy with androgen deprivation therapy for unfavorable risk prostate cancer
title_sort stereotactic body radiotherapy versus conventional/moderate fractionated radiation therapy with androgen deprivation therapy for unfavorable risk prostate cancer
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7493337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32933541
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01658-5
work_keys_str_mv AT patelsagara stereotacticbodyradiotherapyversusconventionalmoderatefractionatedradiationtherapywithandrogendeprivationtherapyforunfavorableriskprostatecancer
AT switchenkojeffreym stereotacticbodyradiotherapyversusconventionalmoderatefractionatedradiationtherapywithandrogendeprivationtherapyforunfavorableriskprostatecancer
AT fischervaluckben stereotacticbodyradiotherapyversusconventionalmoderatefractionatedradiationtherapywithandrogendeprivationtherapyforunfavorableriskprostatecancer
AT zhangchao stereotacticbodyradiotherapyversusconventionalmoderatefractionatedradiationtherapywithandrogendeprivationtherapyforunfavorableriskprostatecancer
AT rosebrents stereotacticbodyradiotherapyversusconventionalmoderatefractionatedradiationtherapywithandrogendeprivationtherapyforunfavorableriskprostatecancer
AT chenronaldc stereotacticbodyradiotherapyversusconventionalmoderatefractionatedradiationtherapywithandrogendeprivationtherapyforunfavorableriskprostatecancer
AT janiasheshb stereotacticbodyradiotherapyversusconventionalmoderatefractionatedradiationtherapywithandrogendeprivationtherapyforunfavorableriskprostatecancer
AT roycetrevorj stereotacticbodyradiotherapyversusconventionalmoderatefractionatedradiationtherapywithandrogendeprivationtherapyforunfavorableriskprostatecancer