Cargando…
Stereotactic body radiotherapy versus conventional/moderate fractionated radiation therapy with androgen deprivation therapy for unfavorable risk prostate cancer
BACKGROUND: Ultrahypofractionation using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an increasingly utilized technique for men with prostate cancer (PC). The comparative efficacy of SBRT plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) compared to fractionated radiotherapy (EBRT) plus ADT in higher-risk prosta...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7493337/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32933541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01658-5 |
_version_ | 1783582547426410496 |
---|---|
author | Patel, Sagar A. Switchenko, Jeffrey M. Fischer-Valuck, Ben Zhang, Chao Rose, Brent S. Chen, Ronald C. Jani, Ashesh B. Royce, Trevor J. |
author_facet | Patel, Sagar A. Switchenko, Jeffrey M. Fischer-Valuck, Ben Zhang, Chao Rose, Brent S. Chen, Ronald C. Jani, Ashesh B. Royce, Trevor J. |
author_sort | Patel, Sagar A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Ultrahypofractionation using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an increasingly utilized technique for men with prostate cancer (PC). The comparative efficacy of SBRT plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) compared to fractionated radiotherapy (EBRT) plus ADT in higher-risk prostate cancer is unknown. METHODS: Men > 40 years old with localized PC treated with external beam radiation and concomitant ADT for curative intent between 2004 and 2016 were analyzed from the National Cancer Database. Patients who lacked ADT or risk stratification data were excluded. 558 men treated with SBRT versus 40,797 men treated with conventional or moderately hypofractionated EBRT were included. Patients were stratified by unfavorable intermediate (UIR) and high (HR) risk using NCCN criteria. Kaplan Meier and Cox proportional hazards were used to compare overall survival (OS) between RT modality, adjusting for age, race, and comorbidity index. RESULTS: With a median follow up of 74 months, there was no difference in estimated 6-year OS between men treated with SBRT versus EBRT regardless of risk group. On multivariable analysis, there was no difference in risk of death for men treated with SBRT compared to EBRT (UIR: adjusted HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.68–1.74, p = .72; HR: adjusted HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.76–1.14, p = .51). On sensitivity analyses, when confining the cohort to men treated with NCCN-preferred dose fractionations, with no comorbidities, or < 65 years old, there remained no survival difference between treatment groups for both UIR and HR. CONCLUSION: Within study limitations, we found no difference in survival between SBRT+ADT and standard of care EBRT+ADT for UIR or HR PC. These results support recent NCCN guideline updates, which include SBRT as a non-preferred option for higher risk men. Prospective validation would further strengthen the evidence basis behind these recommendations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7493337 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74933372020-09-16 Stereotactic body radiotherapy versus conventional/moderate fractionated radiation therapy with androgen deprivation therapy for unfavorable risk prostate cancer Patel, Sagar A. Switchenko, Jeffrey M. Fischer-Valuck, Ben Zhang, Chao Rose, Brent S. Chen, Ronald C. Jani, Ashesh B. Royce, Trevor J. Radiat Oncol Short Report BACKGROUND: Ultrahypofractionation using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an increasingly utilized technique for men with prostate cancer (PC). The comparative efficacy of SBRT plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) compared to fractionated radiotherapy (EBRT) plus ADT in higher-risk prostate cancer is unknown. METHODS: Men > 40 years old with localized PC treated with external beam radiation and concomitant ADT for curative intent between 2004 and 2016 were analyzed from the National Cancer Database. Patients who lacked ADT or risk stratification data were excluded. 558 men treated with SBRT versus 40,797 men treated with conventional or moderately hypofractionated EBRT were included. Patients were stratified by unfavorable intermediate (UIR) and high (HR) risk using NCCN criteria. Kaplan Meier and Cox proportional hazards were used to compare overall survival (OS) between RT modality, adjusting for age, race, and comorbidity index. RESULTS: With a median follow up of 74 months, there was no difference in estimated 6-year OS between men treated with SBRT versus EBRT regardless of risk group. On multivariable analysis, there was no difference in risk of death for men treated with SBRT compared to EBRT (UIR: adjusted HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.68–1.74, p = .72; HR: adjusted HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.76–1.14, p = .51). On sensitivity analyses, when confining the cohort to men treated with NCCN-preferred dose fractionations, with no comorbidities, or < 65 years old, there remained no survival difference between treatment groups for both UIR and HR. CONCLUSION: Within study limitations, we found no difference in survival between SBRT+ADT and standard of care EBRT+ADT for UIR or HR PC. These results support recent NCCN guideline updates, which include SBRT as a non-preferred option for higher risk men. Prospective validation would further strengthen the evidence basis behind these recommendations. BioMed Central 2020-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7493337/ /pubmed/32933541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01658-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Short Report Patel, Sagar A. Switchenko, Jeffrey M. Fischer-Valuck, Ben Zhang, Chao Rose, Brent S. Chen, Ronald C. Jani, Ashesh B. Royce, Trevor J. Stereotactic body radiotherapy versus conventional/moderate fractionated radiation therapy with androgen deprivation therapy for unfavorable risk prostate cancer |
title | Stereotactic body radiotherapy versus conventional/moderate fractionated radiation therapy with androgen deprivation therapy for unfavorable risk prostate cancer |
title_full | Stereotactic body radiotherapy versus conventional/moderate fractionated radiation therapy with androgen deprivation therapy for unfavorable risk prostate cancer |
title_fullStr | Stereotactic body radiotherapy versus conventional/moderate fractionated radiation therapy with androgen deprivation therapy for unfavorable risk prostate cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Stereotactic body radiotherapy versus conventional/moderate fractionated radiation therapy with androgen deprivation therapy for unfavorable risk prostate cancer |
title_short | Stereotactic body radiotherapy versus conventional/moderate fractionated radiation therapy with androgen deprivation therapy for unfavorable risk prostate cancer |
title_sort | stereotactic body radiotherapy versus conventional/moderate fractionated radiation therapy with androgen deprivation therapy for unfavorable risk prostate cancer |
topic | Short Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7493337/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32933541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01658-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT patelsagara stereotacticbodyradiotherapyversusconventionalmoderatefractionatedradiationtherapywithandrogendeprivationtherapyforunfavorableriskprostatecancer AT switchenkojeffreym stereotacticbodyradiotherapyversusconventionalmoderatefractionatedradiationtherapywithandrogendeprivationtherapyforunfavorableriskprostatecancer AT fischervaluckben stereotacticbodyradiotherapyversusconventionalmoderatefractionatedradiationtherapywithandrogendeprivationtherapyforunfavorableriskprostatecancer AT zhangchao stereotacticbodyradiotherapyversusconventionalmoderatefractionatedradiationtherapywithandrogendeprivationtherapyforunfavorableriskprostatecancer AT rosebrents stereotacticbodyradiotherapyversusconventionalmoderatefractionatedradiationtherapywithandrogendeprivationtherapyforunfavorableriskprostatecancer AT chenronaldc stereotacticbodyradiotherapyversusconventionalmoderatefractionatedradiationtherapywithandrogendeprivationtherapyforunfavorableriskprostatecancer AT janiasheshb stereotacticbodyradiotherapyversusconventionalmoderatefractionatedradiationtherapywithandrogendeprivationtherapyforunfavorableriskprostatecancer AT roycetrevorj stereotacticbodyradiotherapyversusconventionalmoderatefractionatedradiationtherapywithandrogendeprivationtherapyforunfavorableriskprostatecancer |