Cargando…

‘All hands-on deck’, working together to develop UK standards for public involvement in research

BACKGROUND: Public involvement in research is an established part of the research process in the UK, however there remain questions about what good public involvement in research looks and feels like. Until now public involvement practitioners, researchers and members of the public have looked for a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crowe, Sally, Adebajo, Ade, Esmael, Hothan, Denegri, Simon, Martin, Angela, McAlister, Bob, Moore, Barbara, Quinn, Martin, Rennard, Una, Simpson, Julie, Wray, Paula, Yeeles, Philippa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7493420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32974049
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-00229-y
_version_ 1783582564583211008
author Crowe, Sally
Adebajo, Ade
Esmael, Hothan
Denegri, Simon
Martin, Angela
McAlister, Bob
Moore, Barbara
Quinn, Martin
Rennard, Una
Simpson, Julie
Wray, Paula
Yeeles, Philippa
author_facet Crowe, Sally
Adebajo, Ade
Esmael, Hothan
Denegri, Simon
Martin, Angela
McAlister, Bob
Moore, Barbara
Quinn, Martin
Rennard, Una
Simpson, Julie
Wray, Paula
Yeeles, Philippa
author_sort Crowe, Sally
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Public involvement in research is an established part of the research process in the UK, however there remain questions about what good public involvement in research looks and feels like. Until now public involvement practitioners, researchers and members of the public have looked for answers in examples shared across networks, published case studies, guidance and research articles. Pulling these strands together, the UK Standards for Public Involvement provides six statements (standards) about public involvement in research. They were produced by a partnership of organisations from Scotland, Northern Ireland, Wales and England with contributions from involvement practitioners, public partners, researchers and research funders. MAIN BODY: Each standard has reflective questions, which are designed to encourage standard users to use approaches and behaviours that improve involvement, over time. The standards are designed to be used as a practical tool, and reflect the agreed hallmarks of good public involvement in research for example, flexibility in approaches used, shared learning, and mutual respect. The standards development process is described from the initial idea and scoping, via the appraisal of existing standard sets and integration of values and principles in public involvement in research. The collaborative writing process of and consultation on the draft standard set is described, together with what changed as a result of feedback. The initiation of a year-long testing programme with forty participating research organisations, the experiential feedback and the resulting changes to the standards is summarised. CONCLUSION: This commentary paper describes, in some detail, a process to develop a set of six standards for public involvement in research in the UK. Producing a complex, national public involvement initiative is not without its challenges, and in supplementary material partnership members reflect on and share their experiences of standards development. The next phase of integration and implementation is explored with concluding comments from those that tested and helped improve the standards.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7493420
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74934202020-09-23 ‘All hands-on deck’, working together to develop UK standards for public involvement in research Crowe, Sally Adebajo, Ade Esmael, Hothan Denegri, Simon Martin, Angela McAlister, Bob Moore, Barbara Quinn, Martin Rennard, Una Simpson, Julie Wray, Paula Yeeles, Philippa Res Involv Engagem Commentary BACKGROUND: Public involvement in research is an established part of the research process in the UK, however there remain questions about what good public involvement in research looks and feels like. Until now public involvement practitioners, researchers and members of the public have looked for answers in examples shared across networks, published case studies, guidance and research articles. Pulling these strands together, the UK Standards for Public Involvement provides six statements (standards) about public involvement in research. They were produced by a partnership of organisations from Scotland, Northern Ireland, Wales and England with contributions from involvement practitioners, public partners, researchers and research funders. MAIN BODY: Each standard has reflective questions, which are designed to encourage standard users to use approaches and behaviours that improve involvement, over time. The standards are designed to be used as a practical tool, and reflect the agreed hallmarks of good public involvement in research for example, flexibility in approaches used, shared learning, and mutual respect. The standards development process is described from the initial idea and scoping, via the appraisal of existing standard sets and integration of values and principles in public involvement in research. The collaborative writing process of and consultation on the draft standard set is described, together with what changed as a result of feedback. The initiation of a year-long testing programme with forty participating research organisations, the experiential feedback and the resulting changes to the standards is summarised. CONCLUSION: This commentary paper describes, in some detail, a process to develop a set of six standards for public involvement in research in the UK. Producing a complex, national public involvement initiative is not without its challenges, and in supplementary material partnership members reflect on and share their experiences of standards development. The next phase of integration and implementation is explored with concluding comments from those that tested and helped improve the standards. BioMed Central 2020-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7493420/ /pubmed/32974049 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-00229-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Commentary
Crowe, Sally
Adebajo, Ade
Esmael, Hothan
Denegri, Simon
Martin, Angela
McAlister, Bob
Moore, Barbara
Quinn, Martin
Rennard, Una
Simpson, Julie
Wray, Paula
Yeeles, Philippa
‘All hands-on deck’, working together to develop UK standards for public involvement in research
title ‘All hands-on deck’, working together to develop UK standards for public involvement in research
title_full ‘All hands-on deck’, working together to develop UK standards for public involvement in research
title_fullStr ‘All hands-on deck’, working together to develop UK standards for public involvement in research
title_full_unstemmed ‘All hands-on deck’, working together to develop UK standards for public involvement in research
title_short ‘All hands-on deck’, working together to develop UK standards for public involvement in research
title_sort ‘all hands-on deck’, working together to develop uk standards for public involvement in research
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7493420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32974049
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-00229-y
work_keys_str_mv AT crowesally allhandsondeckworkingtogethertodevelopukstandardsforpublicinvolvementinresearch
AT adebajoade allhandsondeckworkingtogethertodevelopukstandardsforpublicinvolvementinresearch
AT esmaelhothan allhandsondeckworkingtogethertodevelopukstandardsforpublicinvolvementinresearch
AT denegrisimon allhandsondeckworkingtogethertodevelopukstandardsforpublicinvolvementinresearch
AT martinangela allhandsondeckworkingtogethertodevelopukstandardsforpublicinvolvementinresearch
AT mcalisterbob allhandsondeckworkingtogethertodevelopukstandardsforpublicinvolvementinresearch
AT moorebarbara allhandsondeckworkingtogethertodevelopukstandardsforpublicinvolvementinresearch
AT quinnmartin allhandsondeckworkingtogethertodevelopukstandardsforpublicinvolvementinresearch
AT rennarduna allhandsondeckworkingtogethertodevelopukstandardsforpublicinvolvementinresearch
AT simpsonjulie allhandsondeckworkingtogethertodevelopukstandardsforpublicinvolvementinresearch
AT wraypaula allhandsondeckworkingtogethertodevelopukstandardsforpublicinvolvementinresearch
AT yeelesphilippa allhandsondeckworkingtogethertodevelopukstandardsforpublicinvolvementinresearch