Cargando…
‘All hands-on deck’, working together to develop UK standards for public involvement in research
BACKGROUND: Public involvement in research is an established part of the research process in the UK, however there remain questions about what good public involvement in research looks and feels like. Until now public involvement practitioners, researchers and members of the public have looked for a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7493420/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32974049 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-00229-y |
_version_ | 1783582564583211008 |
---|---|
author | Crowe, Sally Adebajo, Ade Esmael, Hothan Denegri, Simon Martin, Angela McAlister, Bob Moore, Barbara Quinn, Martin Rennard, Una Simpson, Julie Wray, Paula Yeeles, Philippa |
author_facet | Crowe, Sally Adebajo, Ade Esmael, Hothan Denegri, Simon Martin, Angela McAlister, Bob Moore, Barbara Quinn, Martin Rennard, Una Simpson, Julie Wray, Paula Yeeles, Philippa |
author_sort | Crowe, Sally |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Public involvement in research is an established part of the research process in the UK, however there remain questions about what good public involvement in research looks and feels like. Until now public involvement practitioners, researchers and members of the public have looked for answers in examples shared across networks, published case studies, guidance and research articles. Pulling these strands together, the UK Standards for Public Involvement provides six statements (standards) about public involvement in research. They were produced by a partnership of organisations from Scotland, Northern Ireland, Wales and England with contributions from involvement practitioners, public partners, researchers and research funders. MAIN BODY: Each standard has reflective questions, which are designed to encourage standard users to use approaches and behaviours that improve involvement, over time. The standards are designed to be used as a practical tool, and reflect the agreed hallmarks of good public involvement in research for example, flexibility in approaches used, shared learning, and mutual respect. The standards development process is described from the initial idea and scoping, via the appraisal of existing standard sets and integration of values and principles in public involvement in research. The collaborative writing process of and consultation on the draft standard set is described, together with what changed as a result of feedback. The initiation of a year-long testing programme with forty participating research organisations, the experiential feedback and the resulting changes to the standards is summarised. CONCLUSION: This commentary paper describes, in some detail, a process to develop a set of six standards for public involvement in research in the UK. Producing a complex, national public involvement initiative is not without its challenges, and in supplementary material partnership members reflect on and share their experiences of standards development. The next phase of integration and implementation is explored with concluding comments from those that tested and helped improve the standards. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7493420 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74934202020-09-23 ‘All hands-on deck’, working together to develop UK standards for public involvement in research Crowe, Sally Adebajo, Ade Esmael, Hothan Denegri, Simon Martin, Angela McAlister, Bob Moore, Barbara Quinn, Martin Rennard, Una Simpson, Julie Wray, Paula Yeeles, Philippa Res Involv Engagem Commentary BACKGROUND: Public involvement in research is an established part of the research process in the UK, however there remain questions about what good public involvement in research looks and feels like. Until now public involvement practitioners, researchers and members of the public have looked for answers in examples shared across networks, published case studies, guidance and research articles. Pulling these strands together, the UK Standards for Public Involvement provides six statements (standards) about public involvement in research. They were produced by a partnership of organisations from Scotland, Northern Ireland, Wales and England with contributions from involvement practitioners, public partners, researchers and research funders. MAIN BODY: Each standard has reflective questions, which are designed to encourage standard users to use approaches and behaviours that improve involvement, over time. The standards are designed to be used as a practical tool, and reflect the agreed hallmarks of good public involvement in research for example, flexibility in approaches used, shared learning, and mutual respect. The standards development process is described from the initial idea and scoping, via the appraisal of existing standard sets and integration of values and principles in public involvement in research. The collaborative writing process of and consultation on the draft standard set is described, together with what changed as a result of feedback. The initiation of a year-long testing programme with forty participating research organisations, the experiential feedback and the resulting changes to the standards is summarised. CONCLUSION: This commentary paper describes, in some detail, a process to develop a set of six standards for public involvement in research in the UK. Producing a complex, national public involvement initiative is not without its challenges, and in supplementary material partnership members reflect on and share their experiences of standards development. The next phase of integration and implementation is explored with concluding comments from those that tested and helped improve the standards. BioMed Central 2020-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7493420/ /pubmed/32974049 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-00229-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Crowe, Sally Adebajo, Ade Esmael, Hothan Denegri, Simon Martin, Angela McAlister, Bob Moore, Barbara Quinn, Martin Rennard, Una Simpson, Julie Wray, Paula Yeeles, Philippa ‘All hands-on deck’, working together to develop UK standards for public involvement in research |
title | ‘All hands-on deck’, working together to develop UK standards for public involvement in research |
title_full | ‘All hands-on deck’, working together to develop UK standards for public involvement in research |
title_fullStr | ‘All hands-on deck’, working together to develop UK standards for public involvement in research |
title_full_unstemmed | ‘All hands-on deck’, working together to develop UK standards for public involvement in research |
title_short | ‘All hands-on deck’, working together to develop UK standards for public involvement in research |
title_sort | ‘all hands-on deck’, working together to develop uk standards for public involvement in research |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7493420/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32974049 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-00229-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT crowesally allhandsondeckworkingtogethertodevelopukstandardsforpublicinvolvementinresearch AT adebajoade allhandsondeckworkingtogethertodevelopukstandardsforpublicinvolvementinresearch AT esmaelhothan allhandsondeckworkingtogethertodevelopukstandardsforpublicinvolvementinresearch AT denegrisimon allhandsondeckworkingtogethertodevelopukstandardsforpublicinvolvementinresearch AT martinangela allhandsondeckworkingtogethertodevelopukstandardsforpublicinvolvementinresearch AT mcalisterbob allhandsondeckworkingtogethertodevelopukstandardsforpublicinvolvementinresearch AT moorebarbara allhandsondeckworkingtogethertodevelopukstandardsforpublicinvolvementinresearch AT quinnmartin allhandsondeckworkingtogethertodevelopukstandardsforpublicinvolvementinresearch AT rennarduna allhandsondeckworkingtogethertodevelopukstandardsforpublicinvolvementinresearch AT simpsonjulie allhandsondeckworkingtogethertodevelopukstandardsforpublicinvolvementinresearch AT wraypaula allhandsondeckworkingtogethertodevelopukstandardsforpublicinvolvementinresearch AT yeelesphilippa allhandsondeckworkingtogethertodevelopukstandardsforpublicinvolvementinresearch |