Cargando…
An investigation of clinical decisionmaking: identifying important factors in treatment planning for suicidal patients in the emergency department
OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the influence of several well‐documented, readily available risk factors that may influence a psychiatric consultant's decision to admit an emergency department (ED) patient reporting suicidal ideation for psychiatric hospitalization. METHODS: We conducted a ret...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7493507/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33000061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12087 |
_version_ | 1783582579644956672 |
---|---|
author | Knorr, Anne C. Ammerman, Brooke A. LaFleur, Sean A. Misra, Debdipto Dhruv, Mathrawala A. Karunakaran, Bipin Strony, Robert J. |
author_facet | Knorr, Anne C. Ammerman, Brooke A. LaFleur, Sean A. Misra, Debdipto Dhruv, Mathrawala A. Karunakaran, Bipin Strony, Robert J. |
author_sort | Knorr, Anne C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the influence of several well‐documented, readily available risk factors that may influence a psychiatric consultant's decision to admit an emergency department (ED) patient reporting suicidal ideation for psychiatric hospitalization. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of adult patients presenting to six affiliated EDs within Pennsylvania from January 2015 to June 2017. We identified 533 patients reporting current active suicidal ideation and receiving a complete psychiatric consultation. Socio‐demographic characteristics, psychiatric presentation and history, and disposition were collected. Decision tree analysis was conducted with disposition as the outcome. RESULTS: Four of 27 variables emerged as most influential to decisionmaking, including psychiatric consultant determination of current suicide risk, patient age, current depressive disorder diagnosis, and patient history of physical violence. Likelihood of admission versus discharge ranged from 97% to 58%, depending on the variables considered. Post hoc analysis indicated that current suicide plan, access to means, lack of social support, and suicide attempt history were significantly associated with psychiatric consultant determination of moderate‐to‐high suicide risk, with small‐to‐medium effect sizes emerging. CONCLUSIONS: Only a handful of variables drive disposition decisions for ED patients reporting current active suicidal ideation, with both high and low fidelity decisions made. Patient suicide risk, determined by considering empirically supported risk factors for suicide attempt and death, contributes the greatest influence on a psychiatric consultant's decision to admit. In line with American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) recommendations, this study accentuates the importance of using clinical judgment and adjunct measures to determine patient disposition within this population. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7493507 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74935072020-09-29 An investigation of clinical decisionmaking: identifying important factors in treatment planning for suicidal patients in the emergency department Knorr, Anne C. Ammerman, Brooke A. LaFleur, Sean A. Misra, Debdipto Dhruv, Mathrawala A. Karunakaran, Bipin Strony, Robert J. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open The Practice of Emergency Medicine OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the influence of several well‐documented, readily available risk factors that may influence a psychiatric consultant's decision to admit an emergency department (ED) patient reporting suicidal ideation for psychiatric hospitalization. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of adult patients presenting to six affiliated EDs within Pennsylvania from January 2015 to June 2017. We identified 533 patients reporting current active suicidal ideation and receiving a complete psychiatric consultation. Socio‐demographic characteristics, psychiatric presentation and history, and disposition were collected. Decision tree analysis was conducted with disposition as the outcome. RESULTS: Four of 27 variables emerged as most influential to decisionmaking, including psychiatric consultant determination of current suicide risk, patient age, current depressive disorder diagnosis, and patient history of physical violence. Likelihood of admission versus discharge ranged from 97% to 58%, depending on the variables considered. Post hoc analysis indicated that current suicide plan, access to means, lack of social support, and suicide attempt history were significantly associated with psychiatric consultant determination of moderate‐to‐high suicide risk, with small‐to‐medium effect sizes emerging. CONCLUSIONS: Only a handful of variables drive disposition decisions for ED patients reporting current active suicidal ideation, with both high and low fidelity decisions made. Patient suicide risk, determined by considering empirically supported risk factors for suicide attempt and death, contributes the greatest influence on a psychiatric consultant's decision to admit. In line with American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) recommendations, this study accentuates the importance of using clinical judgment and adjunct measures to determine patient disposition within this population. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7493507/ /pubmed/33000061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12087 Text en © 2020 The Authors. JACEP Open published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of the American College of Emergency Physicians. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | The Practice of Emergency Medicine Knorr, Anne C. Ammerman, Brooke A. LaFleur, Sean A. Misra, Debdipto Dhruv, Mathrawala A. Karunakaran, Bipin Strony, Robert J. An investigation of clinical decisionmaking: identifying important factors in treatment planning for suicidal patients in the emergency department |
title | An investigation of clinical decisionmaking: identifying important factors in treatment planning for suicidal patients in the emergency department |
title_full | An investigation of clinical decisionmaking: identifying important factors in treatment planning for suicidal patients in the emergency department |
title_fullStr | An investigation of clinical decisionmaking: identifying important factors in treatment planning for suicidal patients in the emergency department |
title_full_unstemmed | An investigation of clinical decisionmaking: identifying important factors in treatment planning for suicidal patients in the emergency department |
title_short | An investigation of clinical decisionmaking: identifying important factors in treatment planning for suicidal patients in the emergency department |
title_sort | investigation of clinical decisionmaking: identifying important factors in treatment planning for suicidal patients in the emergency department |
topic | The Practice of Emergency Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7493507/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33000061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12087 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT knorrannec aninvestigationofclinicaldecisionmakingidentifyingimportantfactorsintreatmentplanningforsuicidalpatientsintheemergencydepartment AT ammermanbrookea aninvestigationofclinicaldecisionmakingidentifyingimportantfactorsintreatmentplanningforsuicidalpatientsintheemergencydepartment AT lafleurseana aninvestigationofclinicaldecisionmakingidentifyingimportantfactorsintreatmentplanningforsuicidalpatientsintheemergencydepartment AT misradebdipto aninvestigationofclinicaldecisionmakingidentifyingimportantfactorsintreatmentplanningforsuicidalpatientsintheemergencydepartment AT dhruvmathrawalaa aninvestigationofclinicaldecisionmakingidentifyingimportantfactorsintreatmentplanningforsuicidalpatientsintheemergencydepartment AT karunakaranbipin aninvestigationofclinicaldecisionmakingidentifyingimportantfactorsintreatmentplanningforsuicidalpatientsintheemergencydepartment AT stronyrobertj aninvestigationofclinicaldecisionmakingidentifyingimportantfactorsintreatmentplanningforsuicidalpatientsintheemergencydepartment AT knorrannec investigationofclinicaldecisionmakingidentifyingimportantfactorsintreatmentplanningforsuicidalpatientsintheemergencydepartment AT ammermanbrookea investigationofclinicaldecisionmakingidentifyingimportantfactorsintreatmentplanningforsuicidalpatientsintheemergencydepartment AT lafleurseana investigationofclinicaldecisionmakingidentifyingimportantfactorsintreatmentplanningforsuicidalpatientsintheemergencydepartment AT misradebdipto investigationofclinicaldecisionmakingidentifyingimportantfactorsintreatmentplanningforsuicidalpatientsintheemergencydepartment AT dhruvmathrawalaa investigationofclinicaldecisionmakingidentifyingimportantfactorsintreatmentplanningforsuicidalpatientsintheemergencydepartment AT karunakaranbipin investigationofclinicaldecisionmakingidentifyingimportantfactorsintreatmentplanningforsuicidalpatientsintheemergencydepartment AT stronyrobertj investigationofclinicaldecisionmakingidentifyingimportantfactorsintreatmentplanningforsuicidalpatientsintheemergencydepartment |