Cargando…

An investigation of clinical decisionmaking: identifying important factors in treatment planning for suicidal patients in the emergency department

OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the influence of several well‐documented, readily available risk factors that may influence a psychiatric consultant's decision to admit an emergency department (ED) patient reporting suicidal ideation for psychiatric hospitalization. METHODS: We conducted a ret...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Knorr, Anne C., Ammerman, Brooke A., LaFleur, Sean A., Misra, Debdipto, Dhruv, Mathrawala A., Karunakaran, Bipin, Strony, Robert J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7493507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33000061
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12087
_version_ 1783582579644956672
author Knorr, Anne C.
Ammerman, Brooke A.
LaFleur, Sean A.
Misra, Debdipto
Dhruv, Mathrawala A.
Karunakaran, Bipin
Strony, Robert J.
author_facet Knorr, Anne C.
Ammerman, Brooke A.
LaFleur, Sean A.
Misra, Debdipto
Dhruv, Mathrawala A.
Karunakaran, Bipin
Strony, Robert J.
author_sort Knorr, Anne C.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the influence of several well‐documented, readily available risk factors that may influence a psychiatric consultant's decision to admit an emergency department (ED) patient reporting suicidal ideation for psychiatric hospitalization. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of adult patients presenting to six affiliated EDs within Pennsylvania from January 2015 to June 2017. We identified 533 patients reporting current active suicidal ideation and receiving a complete psychiatric consultation. Socio‐demographic characteristics, psychiatric presentation and history, and disposition were collected. Decision tree analysis was conducted with disposition as the outcome. RESULTS: Four of 27 variables emerged as most influential to decisionmaking, including psychiatric consultant determination of current suicide risk, patient age, current depressive disorder diagnosis, and patient history of physical violence. Likelihood of admission versus discharge ranged from 97% to 58%, depending on the variables considered. Post hoc analysis indicated that current suicide plan, access to means, lack of social support, and suicide attempt history were significantly associated with psychiatric consultant determination of moderate‐to‐high suicide risk, with small‐to‐medium effect sizes emerging. CONCLUSIONS: Only a handful of variables drive disposition decisions for ED patients reporting current active suicidal ideation, with both high and low fidelity decisions made. Patient suicide risk, determined by considering empirically supported risk factors for suicide attempt and death, contributes the greatest influence on a psychiatric consultant's decision to admit. In line with American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) recommendations, this study accentuates the importance of using clinical judgment and adjunct measures to determine patient disposition within this population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7493507
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74935072020-09-29 An investigation of clinical decisionmaking: identifying important factors in treatment planning for suicidal patients in the emergency department Knorr, Anne C. Ammerman, Brooke A. LaFleur, Sean A. Misra, Debdipto Dhruv, Mathrawala A. Karunakaran, Bipin Strony, Robert J. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open The Practice of Emergency Medicine OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the influence of several well‐documented, readily available risk factors that may influence a psychiatric consultant's decision to admit an emergency department (ED) patient reporting suicidal ideation for psychiatric hospitalization. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of adult patients presenting to six affiliated EDs within Pennsylvania from January 2015 to June 2017. We identified 533 patients reporting current active suicidal ideation and receiving a complete psychiatric consultation. Socio‐demographic characteristics, psychiatric presentation and history, and disposition were collected. Decision tree analysis was conducted with disposition as the outcome. RESULTS: Four of 27 variables emerged as most influential to decisionmaking, including psychiatric consultant determination of current suicide risk, patient age, current depressive disorder diagnosis, and patient history of physical violence. Likelihood of admission versus discharge ranged from 97% to 58%, depending on the variables considered. Post hoc analysis indicated that current suicide plan, access to means, lack of social support, and suicide attempt history were significantly associated with psychiatric consultant determination of moderate‐to‐high suicide risk, with small‐to‐medium effect sizes emerging. CONCLUSIONS: Only a handful of variables drive disposition decisions for ED patients reporting current active suicidal ideation, with both high and low fidelity decisions made. Patient suicide risk, determined by considering empirically supported risk factors for suicide attempt and death, contributes the greatest influence on a psychiatric consultant's decision to admit. In line with American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) recommendations, this study accentuates the importance of using clinical judgment and adjunct measures to determine patient disposition within this population. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7493507/ /pubmed/33000061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12087 Text en © 2020 The Authors. JACEP Open published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of the American College of Emergency Physicians. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle The Practice of Emergency Medicine
Knorr, Anne C.
Ammerman, Brooke A.
LaFleur, Sean A.
Misra, Debdipto
Dhruv, Mathrawala A.
Karunakaran, Bipin
Strony, Robert J.
An investigation of clinical decisionmaking: identifying important factors in treatment planning for suicidal patients in the emergency department
title An investigation of clinical decisionmaking: identifying important factors in treatment planning for suicidal patients in the emergency department
title_full An investigation of clinical decisionmaking: identifying important factors in treatment planning for suicidal patients in the emergency department
title_fullStr An investigation of clinical decisionmaking: identifying important factors in treatment planning for suicidal patients in the emergency department
title_full_unstemmed An investigation of clinical decisionmaking: identifying important factors in treatment planning for suicidal patients in the emergency department
title_short An investigation of clinical decisionmaking: identifying important factors in treatment planning for suicidal patients in the emergency department
title_sort investigation of clinical decisionmaking: identifying important factors in treatment planning for suicidal patients in the emergency department
topic The Practice of Emergency Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7493507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33000061
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12087
work_keys_str_mv AT knorrannec aninvestigationofclinicaldecisionmakingidentifyingimportantfactorsintreatmentplanningforsuicidalpatientsintheemergencydepartment
AT ammermanbrookea aninvestigationofclinicaldecisionmakingidentifyingimportantfactorsintreatmentplanningforsuicidalpatientsintheemergencydepartment
AT lafleurseana aninvestigationofclinicaldecisionmakingidentifyingimportantfactorsintreatmentplanningforsuicidalpatientsintheemergencydepartment
AT misradebdipto aninvestigationofclinicaldecisionmakingidentifyingimportantfactorsintreatmentplanningforsuicidalpatientsintheemergencydepartment
AT dhruvmathrawalaa aninvestigationofclinicaldecisionmakingidentifyingimportantfactorsintreatmentplanningforsuicidalpatientsintheemergencydepartment
AT karunakaranbipin aninvestigationofclinicaldecisionmakingidentifyingimportantfactorsintreatmentplanningforsuicidalpatientsintheemergencydepartment
AT stronyrobertj aninvestigationofclinicaldecisionmakingidentifyingimportantfactorsintreatmentplanningforsuicidalpatientsintheemergencydepartment
AT knorrannec investigationofclinicaldecisionmakingidentifyingimportantfactorsintreatmentplanningforsuicidalpatientsintheemergencydepartment
AT ammermanbrookea investigationofclinicaldecisionmakingidentifyingimportantfactorsintreatmentplanningforsuicidalpatientsintheemergencydepartment
AT lafleurseana investigationofclinicaldecisionmakingidentifyingimportantfactorsintreatmentplanningforsuicidalpatientsintheemergencydepartment
AT misradebdipto investigationofclinicaldecisionmakingidentifyingimportantfactorsintreatmentplanningforsuicidalpatientsintheemergencydepartment
AT dhruvmathrawalaa investigationofclinicaldecisionmakingidentifyingimportantfactorsintreatmentplanningforsuicidalpatientsintheemergencydepartment
AT karunakaranbipin investigationofclinicaldecisionmakingidentifyingimportantfactorsintreatmentplanningforsuicidalpatientsintheemergencydepartment
AT stronyrobertj investigationofclinicaldecisionmakingidentifyingimportantfactorsintreatmentplanningforsuicidalpatientsintheemergencydepartment