Cargando…

Referent Cueing, Position, and Animacy as Accessibility Factors in Visually Situated Sentence Production

Speakers’ readiness to describe event scenes using active or passive constructions has previously been attributed—among other factors—to the accessibility of referents. While most research has highlighted the accessibility of agents, the present study examines whether patients’ accessibility can be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Esaulova, Yulia, Penke, Martina, Dolscheid, Sarah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7493676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33013536
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02111
_version_ 1783582608567828480
author Esaulova, Yulia
Penke, Martina
Dolscheid, Sarah
author_facet Esaulova, Yulia
Penke, Martina
Dolscheid, Sarah
author_sort Esaulova, Yulia
collection PubMed
description Speakers’ readiness to describe event scenes using active or passive constructions has previously been attributed—among other factors—to the accessibility of referents. While most research has highlighted the accessibility of agents, the present study examines whether patients’ accessibility can be modulated by means of visual preview of the patient character (derived accessibility), as well as by manipulating the animacy status of patients (inherent accessibility). Crucially, we also examined whether effects of accessibility were amenable to the visuospatial position of the patient by presenting the patient character either to the left or to the right of the agent. German native speakers were asked to describe drawings depicting event scenes while their gaze and speech were recorded. Our results show that making patients more accessible using derived and inherent accessibility factors led to more produced passives, shorter speech onsets, and a reduction of fixations on patients. Complementing previous research on agent accessibility, our findings demonstrate that the accessibility of patients affected both sentence production and looking behavior. While effects were observed for both inherent and derived accessibility, they appeared to be more pronounced for the latter. Regarding character position, we observed a significant effect of position on participants’ gaze patterns and structural choices, suggesting that position itself can be considered an accessibility-related factor. Importantly, the position of a patient also interacted with our manipulation of its accessibility via visual preview. Participants produced more passives after preview than no preview for left-positioned but not for right-positioned patients, demonstrating that effects of patient accessibility (i.e., visual preview) were susceptible to character position. A similar interaction was observed for participants’ viewing patterns. These findings provide the first evidence that the position of a referent is a factor that interacts with other accessibility-related factors (i.e., cueing), emphasizing the need of controlling for position effects when testing referent accessibility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7493676
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74936762020-10-02 Referent Cueing, Position, and Animacy as Accessibility Factors in Visually Situated Sentence Production Esaulova, Yulia Penke, Martina Dolscheid, Sarah Front Psychol Psychology Speakers’ readiness to describe event scenes using active or passive constructions has previously been attributed—among other factors—to the accessibility of referents. While most research has highlighted the accessibility of agents, the present study examines whether patients’ accessibility can be modulated by means of visual preview of the patient character (derived accessibility), as well as by manipulating the animacy status of patients (inherent accessibility). Crucially, we also examined whether effects of accessibility were amenable to the visuospatial position of the patient by presenting the patient character either to the left or to the right of the agent. German native speakers were asked to describe drawings depicting event scenes while their gaze and speech were recorded. Our results show that making patients more accessible using derived and inherent accessibility factors led to more produced passives, shorter speech onsets, and a reduction of fixations on patients. Complementing previous research on agent accessibility, our findings demonstrate that the accessibility of patients affected both sentence production and looking behavior. While effects were observed for both inherent and derived accessibility, they appeared to be more pronounced for the latter. Regarding character position, we observed a significant effect of position on participants’ gaze patterns and structural choices, suggesting that position itself can be considered an accessibility-related factor. Importantly, the position of a patient also interacted with our manipulation of its accessibility via visual preview. Participants produced more passives after preview than no preview for left-positioned but not for right-positioned patients, demonstrating that effects of patient accessibility (i.e., visual preview) were susceptible to character position. A similar interaction was observed for participants’ viewing patterns. These findings provide the first evidence that the position of a referent is a factor that interacts with other accessibility-related factors (i.e., cueing), emphasizing the need of controlling for position effects when testing referent accessibility. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7493676/ /pubmed/33013536 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02111 Text en Copyright © 2020 Esaulova, Penke and Dolscheid. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Esaulova, Yulia
Penke, Martina
Dolscheid, Sarah
Referent Cueing, Position, and Animacy as Accessibility Factors in Visually Situated Sentence Production
title Referent Cueing, Position, and Animacy as Accessibility Factors in Visually Situated Sentence Production
title_full Referent Cueing, Position, and Animacy as Accessibility Factors in Visually Situated Sentence Production
title_fullStr Referent Cueing, Position, and Animacy as Accessibility Factors in Visually Situated Sentence Production
title_full_unstemmed Referent Cueing, Position, and Animacy as Accessibility Factors in Visually Situated Sentence Production
title_short Referent Cueing, Position, and Animacy as Accessibility Factors in Visually Situated Sentence Production
title_sort referent cueing, position, and animacy as accessibility factors in visually situated sentence production
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7493676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33013536
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02111
work_keys_str_mv AT esaulovayulia referentcueingpositionandanimacyasaccessibilityfactorsinvisuallysituatedsentenceproduction
AT penkemartina referentcueingpositionandanimacyasaccessibilityfactorsinvisuallysituatedsentenceproduction
AT dolscheidsarah referentcueingpositionandanimacyasaccessibilityfactorsinvisuallysituatedsentenceproduction