Cargando…

Gender Perception From Gait: A Comparison Between Biological, Biomimetic and Non-biomimetic Learning Paradigms

This paper explores in parallel the underlying mechanisms in human perception of biological motion and the best approaches for automatic classification of gait. The experiments tested three different learning paradigms, namely, biological, biomimetic, and non-biomimetic models for gender identificat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sarangi, Viswadeep, Pelah, Adar, Hahn, William Edward, Barenholtz, Elan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7493679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33117137
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00320
_version_ 1783582609258840064
author Sarangi, Viswadeep
Pelah, Adar
Hahn, William Edward
Barenholtz, Elan
author_facet Sarangi, Viswadeep
Pelah, Adar
Hahn, William Edward
Barenholtz, Elan
author_sort Sarangi, Viswadeep
collection PubMed
description This paper explores in parallel the underlying mechanisms in human perception of biological motion and the best approaches for automatic classification of gait. The experiments tested three different learning paradigms, namely, biological, biomimetic, and non-biomimetic models for gender identification from human gait. Psychophysical experiments with twenty-one observers were conducted along with computational experiments without applying any gender specific modifications to the models or the stimuli. Results demonstrate the utilization of a generic memory based learning system in humans for gait perception, thus reducing ambiguity between two opposing learning systems proposed for biological motion perception. Results also support the biomimetic nature of memory based artificial neural networks (ANN) in their ability to emulate biological neural networks, as opposed to non-biomimetic models. In addition, the comparison between biological and computational learning approaches establishes a memory based biomimetic model as the best candidate for a generic artificial gait classifier (83% accuracy, p < 0.001), compared to human observers (66%, p < 0.005) or non-biomimetic models (83%, p < 0.001) while adhering to human-like sensitivity to gender identification, promising potential for application of the model in any given non-gender based gait perception objective with superhuman performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7493679
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74936792020-10-27 Gender Perception From Gait: A Comparison Between Biological, Biomimetic and Non-biomimetic Learning Paradigms Sarangi, Viswadeep Pelah, Adar Hahn, William Edward Barenholtz, Elan Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience This paper explores in parallel the underlying mechanisms in human perception of biological motion and the best approaches for automatic classification of gait. The experiments tested three different learning paradigms, namely, biological, biomimetic, and non-biomimetic models for gender identification from human gait. Psychophysical experiments with twenty-one observers were conducted along with computational experiments without applying any gender specific modifications to the models or the stimuli. Results demonstrate the utilization of a generic memory based learning system in humans for gait perception, thus reducing ambiguity between two opposing learning systems proposed for biological motion perception. Results also support the biomimetic nature of memory based artificial neural networks (ANN) in their ability to emulate biological neural networks, as opposed to non-biomimetic models. In addition, the comparison between biological and computational learning approaches establishes a memory based biomimetic model as the best candidate for a generic artificial gait classifier (83% accuracy, p < 0.001), compared to human observers (66%, p < 0.005) or non-biomimetic models (83%, p < 0.001) while adhering to human-like sensitivity to gender identification, promising potential for application of the model in any given non-gender based gait perception objective with superhuman performance. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7493679/ /pubmed/33117137 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00320 Text en Copyright © 2020 Sarangi, Pelah, Hahn and Barenholtz. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Sarangi, Viswadeep
Pelah, Adar
Hahn, William Edward
Barenholtz, Elan
Gender Perception From Gait: A Comparison Between Biological, Biomimetic and Non-biomimetic Learning Paradigms
title Gender Perception From Gait: A Comparison Between Biological, Biomimetic and Non-biomimetic Learning Paradigms
title_full Gender Perception From Gait: A Comparison Between Biological, Biomimetic and Non-biomimetic Learning Paradigms
title_fullStr Gender Perception From Gait: A Comparison Between Biological, Biomimetic and Non-biomimetic Learning Paradigms
title_full_unstemmed Gender Perception From Gait: A Comparison Between Biological, Biomimetic and Non-biomimetic Learning Paradigms
title_short Gender Perception From Gait: A Comparison Between Biological, Biomimetic and Non-biomimetic Learning Paradigms
title_sort gender perception from gait: a comparison between biological, biomimetic and non-biomimetic learning paradigms
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7493679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33117137
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00320
work_keys_str_mv AT sarangiviswadeep genderperceptionfromgaitacomparisonbetweenbiologicalbiomimeticandnonbiomimeticlearningparadigms
AT pelahadar genderperceptionfromgaitacomparisonbetweenbiologicalbiomimeticandnonbiomimeticlearningparadigms
AT hahnwilliamedward genderperceptionfromgaitacomparisonbetweenbiologicalbiomimeticandnonbiomimeticlearningparadigms
AT barenholtzelan genderperceptionfromgaitacomparisonbetweenbiologicalbiomimeticandnonbiomimeticlearningparadigms