Cargando…

The subgroups of the phase III RECOURSE trial of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) versus placebo with best supportive care in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND: In the phase III RECOURSE trial, trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) extended overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) with an acceptable toxicity profile in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory or intolerant to standard therapies. The present analysis inve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Van Cutsem, Eric, Mayer, Robert J., Laurent, Stéphanie, Winkler, Robert, Grávalos, Cristina, Benavides, Manuel, Longo-Munoz, Federico, Portales, Fabienne, Ciardiello, Fortunato, Siena, Salvatore, Yamaguchi, Kensei, Muro, Kei, Denda, Tadamichi, Tsuji, Yasushi, Makris, Lukas, Loehrer, Patrick, Lenz, Heinz-Josef, Ohtsu, Atsushi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7493695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29274618
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2017.10.009
_version_ 1783582612308099072
author Van Cutsem, Eric
Mayer, Robert J.
Laurent, Stéphanie
Winkler, Robert
Grávalos, Cristina
Benavides, Manuel
Longo-Munoz, Federico
Portales, Fabienne
Ciardiello, Fortunato
Siena, Salvatore
Yamaguchi, Kensei
Muro, Kei
Denda, Tadamichi
Tsuji, Yasushi
Makris, Lukas
Loehrer, Patrick
Lenz, Heinz-Josef
Ohtsu, Atsushi
author_facet Van Cutsem, Eric
Mayer, Robert J.
Laurent, Stéphanie
Winkler, Robert
Grávalos, Cristina
Benavides, Manuel
Longo-Munoz, Federico
Portales, Fabienne
Ciardiello, Fortunato
Siena, Salvatore
Yamaguchi, Kensei
Muro, Kei
Denda, Tadamichi
Tsuji, Yasushi
Makris, Lukas
Loehrer, Patrick
Lenz, Heinz-Josef
Ohtsu, Atsushi
author_sort Van Cutsem, Eric
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the phase III RECOURSE trial, trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) extended overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) with an acceptable toxicity profile in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory or intolerant to standard therapies. The present analysis investigated the efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil in RECOURSE subgroups. METHODS: Primary and key secondary end-points were evaluated using a Cox proportional hazards model in prespecified subgroups, including geographical subregion (United States of America [USA], European Union [EU], Japan), age (<65 years, ≥65 years) and v-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma 2 viral oncogene homologue (KRAS) status (wild type, mutant). Safety and tolerability were reported with descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Eight-hundred patients were enrolled: USA, n = 99; EU, n = 403; Japan, n = 266. Patients aged ≥65 years and those with mutant KRAS tumours comprised 44% and 51% of all patients in the subregions, respectively. Final OS analysis (including 89% of events, compared with 72% in the initial analysis) confirmed the survival benefit associated with trifluridine/tipiracil, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.69 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59–0.81; P = 0.0001). Median OS in the three regions was 6.5–7.8 months in the trifluridine/tipiracil arm and 4.3–6.7 months in the placebo arm (USA: HR 0.56; 95% CI 0.34–0.94; P = 0.0277; EU: HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.48–0.80; P = 0.0002; Japan: HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.57–1.00; P = 0.0470). Median PFS was 2.0–2.8 months for trifluridine/tipiracil and 1.7–1.8 months for placebo; HRs favoured trifluridine/tipiracil in all regions. Similar clinical benefits of trifluridine/tipiracil were observed in elderly patients and in those with mutant KRAS tumours. There were no marked differences among subregions in terms of safety and tolerability. CONCLUSIONS: Trifluridine/tipiracil was effective in all subgroups, regardless of age, geographical origin or KRAS status. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01607957.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7493695
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74936952020-09-16 The subgroups of the phase III RECOURSE trial of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) versus placebo with best supportive care in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer Van Cutsem, Eric Mayer, Robert J. Laurent, Stéphanie Winkler, Robert Grávalos, Cristina Benavides, Manuel Longo-Munoz, Federico Portales, Fabienne Ciardiello, Fortunato Siena, Salvatore Yamaguchi, Kensei Muro, Kei Denda, Tadamichi Tsuji, Yasushi Makris, Lukas Loehrer, Patrick Lenz, Heinz-Josef Ohtsu, Atsushi Eur J Cancer Article BACKGROUND: In the phase III RECOURSE trial, trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) extended overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) with an acceptable toxicity profile in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory or intolerant to standard therapies. The present analysis investigated the efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil in RECOURSE subgroups. METHODS: Primary and key secondary end-points were evaluated using a Cox proportional hazards model in prespecified subgroups, including geographical subregion (United States of America [USA], European Union [EU], Japan), age (<65 years, ≥65 years) and v-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma 2 viral oncogene homologue (KRAS) status (wild type, mutant). Safety and tolerability were reported with descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Eight-hundred patients were enrolled: USA, n = 99; EU, n = 403; Japan, n = 266. Patients aged ≥65 years and those with mutant KRAS tumours comprised 44% and 51% of all patients in the subregions, respectively. Final OS analysis (including 89% of events, compared with 72% in the initial analysis) confirmed the survival benefit associated with trifluridine/tipiracil, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.69 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59–0.81; P = 0.0001). Median OS in the three regions was 6.5–7.8 months in the trifluridine/tipiracil arm and 4.3–6.7 months in the placebo arm (USA: HR 0.56; 95% CI 0.34–0.94; P = 0.0277; EU: HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.48–0.80; P = 0.0002; Japan: HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.57–1.00; P = 0.0470). Median PFS was 2.0–2.8 months for trifluridine/tipiracil and 1.7–1.8 months for placebo; HRs favoured trifluridine/tipiracil in all regions. Similar clinical benefits of trifluridine/tipiracil were observed in elderly patients and in those with mutant KRAS tumours. There were no marked differences among subregions in terms of safety and tolerability. CONCLUSIONS: Trifluridine/tipiracil was effective in all subgroups, regardless of age, geographical origin or KRAS status. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01607957. 2017-12-21 2018-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7493695/ /pubmed/29274618 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2017.10.009 Text en This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Van Cutsem, Eric
Mayer, Robert J.
Laurent, Stéphanie
Winkler, Robert
Grávalos, Cristina
Benavides, Manuel
Longo-Munoz, Federico
Portales, Fabienne
Ciardiello, Fortunato
Siena, Salvatore
Yamaguchi, Kensei
Muro, Kei
Denda, Tadamichi
Tsuji, Yasushi
Makris, Lukas
Loehrer, Patrick
Lenz, Heinz-Josef
Ohtsu, Atsushi
The subgroups of the phase III RECOURSE trial of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) versus placebo with best supportive care in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
title The subgroups of the phase III RECOURSE trial of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) versus placebo with best supportive care in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
title_full The subgroups of the phase III RECOURSE trial of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) versus placebo with best supportive care in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
title_fullStr The subgroups of the phase III RECOURSE trial of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) versus placebo with best supportive care in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed The subgroups of the phase III RECOURSE trial of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) versus placebo with best supportive care in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
title_short The subgroups of the phase III RECOURSE trial of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) versus placebo with best supportive care in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
title_sort subgroups of the phase iii recourse trial of trifluridine/tipiracil (tas-102) versus placebo with best supportive care in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7493695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29274618
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2017.10.009
work_keys_str_mv AT vancutsemeric thesubgroupsofthephaseiiirecoursetrialoftrifluridinetipiraciltas102versusplacebowithbestsupportivecareinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT mayerrobertj thesubgroupsofthephaseiiirecoursetrialoftrifluridinetipiraciltas102versusplacebowithbestsupportivecareinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT laurentstephanie thesubgroupsofthephaseiiirecoursetrialoftrifluridinetipiraciltas102versusplacebowithbestsupportivecareinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT winklerrobert thesubgroupsofthephaseiiirecoursetrialoftrifluridinetipiraciltas102versusplacebowithbestsupportivecareinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT gravaloscristina thesubgroupsofthephaseiiirecoursetrialoftrifluridinetipiraciltas102versusplacebowithbestsupportivecareinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT benavidesmanuel thesubgroupsofthephaseiiirecoursetrialoftrifluridinetipiraciltas102versusplacebowithbestsupportivecareinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT longomunozfederico thesubgroupsofthephaseiiirecoursetrialoftrifluridinetipiraciltas102versusplacebowithbestsupportivecareinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT portalesfabienne thesubgroupsofthephaseiiirecoursetrialoftrifluridinetipiraciltas102versusplacebowithbestsupportivecareinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT ciardiellofortunato thesubgroupsofthephaseiiirecoursetrialoftrifluridinetipiraciltas102versusplacebowithbestsupportivecareinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT sienasalvatore thesubgroupsofthephaseiiirecoursetrialoftrifluridinetipiraciltas102versusplacebowithbestsupportivecareinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT yamaguchikensei thesubgroupsofthephaseiiirecoursetrialoftrifluridinetipiraciltas102versusplacebowithbestsupportivecareinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT murokei thesubgroupsofthephaseiiirecoursetrialoftrifluridinetipiraciltas102versusplacebowithbestsupportivecareinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT dendatadamichi thesubgroupsofthephaseiiirecoursetrialoftrifluridinetipiraciltas102versusplacebowithbestsupportivecareinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT tsujiyasushi thesubgroupsofthephaseiiirecoursetrialoftrifluridinetipiraciltas102versusplacebowithbestsupportivecareinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT makrislukas thesubgroupsofthephaseiiirecoursetrialoftrifluridinetipiraciltas102versusplacebowithbestsupportivecareinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT loehrerpatrick thesubgroupsofthephaseiiirecoursetrialoftrifluridinetipiraciltas102versusplacebowithbestsupportivecareinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT lenzheinzjosef thesubgroupsofthephaseiiirecoursetrialoftrifluridinetipiraciltas102versusplacebowithbestsupportivecareinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT ohtsuatsushi thesubgroupsofthephaseiiirecoursetrialoftrifluridinetipiraciltas102versusplacebowithbestsupportivecareinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT vancutsemeric subgroupsofthephaseiiirecoursetrialoftrifluridinetipiraciltas102versusplacebowithbestsupportivecareinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT mayerrobertj subgroupsofthephaseiiirecoursetrialoftrifluridinetipiraciltas102versusplacebowithbestsupportivecareinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT laurentstephanie subgroupsofthephaseiiirecoursetrialoftrifluridinetipiraciltas102versusplacebowithbestsupportivecareinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT winklerrobert subgroupsofthephaseiiirecoursetrialoftrifluridinetipiraciltas102versusplacebowithbestsupportivecareinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT gravaloscristina subgroupsofthephaseiiirecoursetrialoftrifluridinetipiraciltas102versusplacebowithbestsupportivecareinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT benavidesmanuel subgroupsofthephaseiiirecoursetrialoftrifluridinetipiraciltas102versusplacebowithbestsupportivecareinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT longomunozfederico subgroupsofthephaseiiirecoursetrialoftrifluridinetipiraciltas102versusplacebowithbestsupportivecareinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT portalesfabienne subgroupsofthephaseiiirecoursetrialoftrifluridinetipiraciltas102versusplacebowithbestsupportivecareinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT ciardiellofortunato subgroupsofthephaseiiirecoursetrialoftrifluridinetipiraciltas102versusplacebowithbestsupportivecareinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT sienasalvatore subgroupsofthephaseiiirecoursetrialoftrifluridinetipiraciltas102versusplacebowithbestsupportivecareinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT yamaguchikensei subgroupsofthephaseiiirecoursetrialoftrifluridinetipiraciltas102versusplacebowithbestsupportivecareinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT murokei subgroupsofthephaseiiirecoursetrialoftrifluridinetipiraciltas102versusplacebowithbestsupportivecareinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT dendatadamichi subgroupsofthephaseiiirecoursetrialoftrifluridinetipiraciltas102versusplacebowithbestsupportivecareinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT tsujiyasushi subgroupsofthephaseiiirecoursetrialoftrifluridinetipiraciltas102versusplacebowithbestsupportivecareinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT makrislukas subgroupsofthephaseiiirecoursetrialoftrifluridinetipiraciltas102versusplacebowithbestsupportivecareinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT loehrerpatrick subgroupsofthephaseiiirecoursetrialoftrifluridinetipiraciltas102versusplacebowithbestsupportivecareinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT lenzheinzjosef subgroupsofthephaseiiirecoursetrialoftrifluridinetipiraciltas102versusplacebowithbestsupportivecareinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT ohtsuatsushi subgroupsofthephaseiiirecoursetrialoftrifluridinetipiraciltas102versusplacebowithbestsupportivecareinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer