Cargando…
Validation of Nine Different Prognostic Grading Indexes for Radiosurgery of Brain Metastases in Breast Cancer Patients and Development of an All-Encompassing Prognostic Tool
Purpose: Several prognostic indexes for overall survival (OS) after radiotherapy of brain metastases in breast cancer patients exist but are mainly validated for whole-brain radiotherapy or not specifically for breast cancer patients. To date, no such index provides information beyond mere OS. Metho...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7493741/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33014802 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.01557 |
_version_ | 1783582621400301568 |
---|---|
author | Weykamp, Fabian El Shafie, Rami A. König, Laila Seidensaal, Katharina Forster, Tobias Arians, Nathalie Regnery, Sebastian Hoegen, Philipp Deutsch, Thomas M. Schneeweiss, Andreas Debus, Jürgen Hörner-Rieber, Juliane |
author_facet | Weykamp, Fabian El Shafie, Rami A. König, Laila Seidensaal, Katharina Forster, Tobias Arians, Nathalie Regnery, Sebastian Hoegen, Philipp Deutsch, Thomas M. Schneeweiss, Andreas Debus, Jürgen Hörner-Rieber, Juliane |
author_sort | Weykamp, Fabian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose: Several prognostic indexes for overall survival (OS) after radiotherapy of brain metastases in breast cancer patients exist but are mainly validated for whole-brain radiotherapy or not specifically for breast cancer patients. To date, no such index provides information beyond mere OS. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 95 breast cancer patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery for 203 brain metastases. The Kaplan–Meier method with log-rank test was used to assess OS, local control (LC), distant cranial control (DCC), and extracranial control (EC). Cox regression was applied to detect prognostic outcome factors. A point scoring system was designed to stratify patients based on outcome. Nine established prognostic indexes were analyzed using the concordance index (c-index). Results: Two out of nine analyzed prognostic indexes for OS showed a significant c-index, the breast graded prognostic assessment (bGPA; 0.631; 95% CI, 0.514–0.748; p = 0.037) and the modified bGPA (mod-bGPA; 0.662; 95% CI, 0.547–0.777; p = 0.010). Significant results from multivariate analysis (Karnofsky Performance Score, Her2/neu receptor status, extracranial control) were used to generate a new point system: the breast cancer stereotactic radiotherapy score (bSRS), which discriminated three significantly different prognostic groups, for LC, DCC, EC, and OS, respectively. However, the c-index was only significant for OS (0.689; 95% CI, 0.577–0.802; p = 0.003). Conclusions: The new bSRS score was superior to the bGPA and mod-bGPA scores for prognosis of OS. The bSRS is easy to use and the first tool, which might also provide outcome assessment beyond mere OS. Future studies need to validate these findings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7493741 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74937412020-10-02 Validation of Nine Different Prognostic Grading Indexes for Radiosurgery of Brain Metastases in Breast Cancer Patients and Development of an All-Encompassing Prognostic Tool Weykamp, Fabian El Shafie, Rami A. König, Laila Seidensaal, Katharina Forster, Tobias Arians, Nathalie Regnery, Sebastian Hoegen, Philipp Deutsch, Thomas M. Schneeweiss, Andreas Debus, Jürgen Hörner-Rieber, Juliane Front Oncol Oncology Purpose: Several prognostic indexes for overall survival (OS) after radiotherapy of brain metastases in breast cancer patients exist but are mainly validated for whole-brain radiotherapy or not specifically for breast cancer patients. To date, no such index provides information beyond mere OS. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 95 breast cancer patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery for 203 brain metastases. The Kaplan–Meier method with log-rank test was used to assess OS, local control (LC), distant cranial control (DCC), and extracranial control (EC). Cox regression was applied to detect prognostic outcome factors. A point scoring system was designed to stratify patients based on outcome. Nine established prognostic indexes were analyzed using the concordance index (c-index). Results: Two out of nine analyzed prognostic indexes for OS showed a significant c-index, the breast graded prognostic assessment (bGPA; 0.631; 95% CI, 0.514–0.748; p = 0.037) and the modified bGPA (mod-bGPA; 0.662; 95% CI, 0.547–0.777; p = 0.010). Significant results from multivariate analysis (Karnofsky Performance Score, Her2/neu receptor status, extracranial control) were used to generate a new point system: the breast cancer stereotactic radiotherapy score (bSRS), which discriminated three significantly different prognostic groups, for LC, DCC, EC, and OS, respectively. However, the c-index was only significant for OS (0.689; 95% CI, 0.577–0.802; p = 0.003). Conclusions: The new bSRS score was superior to the bGPA and mod-bGPA scores for prognosis of OS. The bSRS is easy to use and the first tool, which might also provide outcome assessment beyond mere OS. Future studies need to validate these findings. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7493741/ /pubmed/33014802 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.01557 Text en Copyright © 2020 Weykamp, El Shafie, König, Seidensaal, Forster, Arians, Regnery, Hoegen, Deutsch, Schneeweiss, Debus and Hörner-Rieber. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Weykamp, Fabian El Shafie, Rami A. König, Laila Seidensaal, Katharina Forster, Tobias Arians, Nathalie Regnery, Sebastian Hoegen, Philipp Deutsch, Thomas M. Schneeweiss, Andreas Debus, Jürgen Hörner-Rieber, Juliane Validation of Nine Different Prognostic Grading Indexes for Radiosurgery of Brain Metastases in Breast Cancer Patients and Development of an All-Encompassing Prognostic Tool |
title | Validation of Nine Different Prognostic Grading Indexes for Radiosurgery of Brain Metastases in Breast Cancer Patients and Development of an All-Encompassing Prognostic Tool |
title_full | Validation of Nine Different Prognostic Grading Indexes for Radiosurgery of Brain Metastases in Breast Cancer Patients and Development of an All-Encompassing Prognostic Tool |
title_fullStr | Validation of Nine Different Prognostic Grading Indexes for Radiosurgery of Brain Metastases in Breast Cancer Patients and Development of an All-Encompassing Prognostic Tool |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of Nine Different Prognostic Grading Indexes for Radiosurgery of Brain Metastases in Breast Cancer Patients and Development of an All-Encompassing Prognostic Tool |
title_short | Validation of Nine Different Prognostic Grading Indexes for Radiosurgery of Brain Metastases in Breast Cancer Patients and Development of an All-Encompassing Prognostic Tool |
title_sort | validation of nine different prognostic grading indexes for radiosurgery of brain metastases in breast cancer patients and development of an all-encompassing prognostic tool |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7493741/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33014802 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.01557 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT weykampfabian validationofninedifferentprognosticgradingindexesforradiosurgeryofbrainmetastasesinbreastcancerpatientsanddevelopmentofanallencompassingprognostictool AT elshafieramia validationofninedifferentprognosticgradingindexesforradiosurgeryofbrainmetastasesinbreastcancerpatientsanddevelopmentofanallencompassingprognostictool AT koniglaila validationofninedifferentprognosticgradingindexesforradiosurgeryofbrainmetastasesinbreastcancerpatientsanddevelopmentofanallencompassingprognostictool AT seidensaalkatharina validationofninedifferentprognosticgradingindexesforradiosurgeryofbrainmetastasesinbreastcancerpatientsanddevelopmentofanallencompassingprognostictool AT forstertobias validationofninedifferentprognosticgradingindexesforradiosurgeryofbrainmetastasesinbreastcancerpatientsanddevelopmentofanallencompassingprognostictool AT ariansnathalie validationofninedifferentprognosticgradingindexesforradiosurgeryofbrainmetastasesinbreastcancerpatientsanddevelopmentofanallencompassingprognostictool AT regnerysebastian validationofninedifferentprognosticgradingindexesforradiosurgeryofbrainmetastasesinbreastcancerpatientsanddevelopmentofanallencompassingprognostictool AT hoegenphilipp validationofninedifferentprognosticgradingindexesforradiosurgeryofbrainmetastasesinbreastcancerpatientsanddevelopmentofanallencompassingprognostictool AT deutschthomasm validationofninedifferentprognosticgradingindexesforradiosurgeryofbrainmetastasesinbreastcancerpatientsanddevelopmentofanallencompassingprognostictool AT schneeweissandreas validationofninedifferentprognosticgradingindexesforradiosurgeryofbrainmetastasesinbreastcancerpatientsanddevelopmentofanallencompassingprognostictool AT debusjurgen validationofninedifferentprognosticgradingindexesforradiosurgeryofbrainmetastasesinbreastcancerpatientsanddevelopmentofanallencompassingprognostictool AT hornerrieberjuliane validationofninedifferentprognosticgradingindexesforradiosurgeryofbrainmetastasesinbreastcancerpatientsanddevelopmentofanallencompassingprognostictool |