Cargando…

Validation of Nine Different Prognostic Grading Indexes for Radiosurgery of Brain Metastases in Breast Cancer Patients and Development of an All-Encompassing Prognostic Tool

Purpose: Several prognostic indexes for overall survival (OS) after radiotherapy of brain metastases in breast cancer patients exist but are mainly validated for whole-brain radiotherapy or not specifically for breast cancer patients. To date, no such index provides information beyond mere OS. Metho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weykamp, Fabian, El Shafie, Rami A., König, Laila, Seidensaal, Katharina, Forster, Tobias, Arians, Nathalie, Regnery, Sebastian, Hoegen, Philipp, Deutsch, Thomas M., Schneeweiss, Andreas, Debus, Jürgen, Hörner-Rieber, Juliane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7493741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33014802
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.01557
_version_ 1783582621400301568
author Weykamp, Fabian
El Shafie, Rami A.
König, Laila
Seidensaal, Katharina
Forster, Tobias
Arians, Nathalie
Regnery, Sebastian
Hoegen, Philipp
Deutsch, Thomas M.
Schneeweiss, Andreas
Debus, Jürgen
Hörner-Rieber, Juliane
author_facet Weykamp, Fabian
El Shafie, Rami A.
König, Laila
Seidensaal, Katharina
Forster, Tobias
Arians, Nathalie
Regnery, Sebastian
Hoegen, Philipp
Deutsch, Thomas M.
Schneeweiss, Andreas
Debus, Jürgen
Hörner-Rieber, Juliane
author_sort Weykamp, Fabian
collection PubMed
description Purpose: Several prognostic indexes for overall survival (OS) after radiotherapy of brain metastases in breast cancer patients exist but are mainly validated for whole-brain radiotherapy or not specifically for breast cancer patients. To date, no such index provides information beyond mere OS. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 95 breast cancer patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery for 203 brain metastases. The Kaplan–Meier method with log-rank test was used to assess OS, local control (LC), distant cranial control (DCC), and extracranial control (EC). Cox regression was applied to detect prognostic outcome factors. A point scoring system was designed to stratify patients based on outcome. Nine established prognostic indexes were analyzed using the concordance index (c-index). Results: Two out of nine analyzed prognostic indexes for OS showed a significant c-index, the breast graded prognostic assessment (bGPA; 0.631; 95% CI, 0.514–0.748; p = 0.037) and the modified bGPA (mod-bGPA; 0.662; 95% CI, 0.547–0.777; p = 0.010). Significant results from multivariate analysis (Karnofsky Performance Score, Her2/neu receptor status, extracranial control) were used to generate a new point system: the breast cancer stereotactic radiotherapy score (bSRS), which discriminated three significantly different prognostic groups, for LC, DCC, EC, and OS, respectively. However, the c-index was only significant for OS (0.689; 95% CI, 0.577–0.802; p = 0.003). Conclusions: The new bSRS score was superior to the bGPA and mod-bGPA scores for prognosis of OS. The bSRS is easy to use and the first tool, which might also provide outcome assessment beyond mere OS. Future studies need to validate these findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7493741
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74937412020-10-02 Validation of Nine Different Prognostic Grading Indexes for Radiosurgery of Brain Metastases in Breast Cancer Patients and Development of an All-Encompassing Prognostic Tool Weykamp, Fabian El Shafie, Rami A. König, Laila Seidensaal, Katharina Forster, Tobias Arians, Nathalie Regnery, Sebastian Hoegen, Philipp Deutsch, Thomas M. Schneeweiss, Andreas Debus, Jürgen Hörner-Rieber, Juliane Front Oncol Oncology Purpose: Several prognostic indexes for overall survival (OS) after radiotherapy of brain metastases in breast cancer patients exist but are mainly validated for whole-brain radiotherapy or not specifically for breast cancer patients. To date, no such index provides information beyond mere OS. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 95 breast cancer patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery for 203 brain metastases. The Kaplan–Meier method with log-rank test was used to assess OS, local control (LC), distant cranial control (DCC), and extracranial control (EC). Cox regression was applied to detect prognostic outcome factors. A point scoring system was designed to stratify patients based on outcome. Nine established prognostic indexes were analyzed using the concordance index (c-index). Results: Two out of nine analyzed prognostic indexes for OS showed a significant c-index, the breast graded prognostic assessment (bGPA; 0.631; 95% CI, 0.514–0.748; p = 0.037) and the modified bGPA (mod-bGPA; 0.662; 95% CI, 0.547–0.777; p = 0.010). Significant results from multivariate analysis (Karnofsky Performance Score, Her2/neu receptor status, extracranial control) were used to generate a new point system: the breast cancer stereotactic radiotherapy score (bSRS), which discriminated three significantly different prognostic groups, for LC, DCC, EC, and OS, respectively. However, the c-index was only significant for OS (0.689; 95% CI, 0.577–0.802; p = 0.003). Conclusions: The new bSRS score was superior to the bGPA and mod-bGPA scores for prognosis of OS. The bSRS is easy to use and the first tool, which might also provide outcome assessment beyond mere OS. Future studies need to validate these findings. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7493741/ /pubmed/33014802 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.01557 Text en Copyright © 2020 Weykamp, El Shafie, König, Seidensaal, Forster, Arians, Regnery, Hoegen, Deutsch, Schneeweiss, Debus and Hörner-Rieber. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Weykamp, Fabian
El Shafie, Rami A.
König, Laila
Seidensaal, Katharina
Forster, Tobias
Arians, Nathalie
Regnery, Sebastian
Hoegen, Philipp
Deutsch, Thomas M.
Schneeweiss, Andreas
Debus, Jürgen
Hörner-Rieber, Juliane
Validation of Nine Different Prognostic Grading Indexes for Radiosurgery of Brain Metastases in Breast Cancer Patients and Development of an All-Encompassing Prognostic Tool
title Validation of Nine Different Prognostic Grading Indexes for Radiosurgery of Brain Metastases in Breast Cancer Patients and Development of an All-Encompassing Prognostic Tool
title_full Validation of Nine Different Prognostic Grading Indexes for Radiosurgery of Brain Metastases in Breast Cancer Patients and Development of an All-Encompassing Prognostic Tool
title_fullStr Validation of Nine Different Prognostic Grading Indexes for Radiosurgery of Brain Metastases in Breast Cancer Patients and Development of an All-Encompassing Prognostic Tool
title_full_unstemmed Validation of Nine Different Prognostic Grading Indexes for Radiosurgery of Brain Metastases in Breast Cancer Patients and Development of an All-Encompassing Prognostic Tool
title_short Validation of Nine Different Prognostic Grading Indexes for Radiosurgery of Brain Metastases in Breast Cancer Patients and Development of an All-Encompassing Prognostic Tool
title_sort validation of nine different prognostic grading indexes for radiosurgery of brain metastases in breast cancer patients and development of an all-encompassing prognostic tool
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7493741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33014802
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.01557
work_keys_str_mv AT weykampfabian validationofninedifferentprognosticgradingindexesforradiosurgeryofbrainmetastasesinbreastcancerpatientsanddevelopmentofanallencompassingprognostictool
AT elshafieramia validationofninedifferentprognosticgradingindexesforradiosurgeryofbrainmetastasesinbreastcancerpatientsanddevelopmentofanallencompassingprognostictool
AT koniglaila validationofninedifferentprognosticgradingindexesforradiosurgeryofbrainmetastasesinbreastcancerpatientsanddevelopmentofanallencompassingprognostictool
AT seidensaalkatharina validationofninedifferentprognosticgradingindexesforradiosurgeryofbrainmetastasesinbreastcancerpatientsanddevelopmentofanallencompassingprognostictool
AT forstertobias validationofninedifferentprognosticgradingindexesforradiosurgeryofbrainmetastasesinbreastcancerpatientsanddevelopmentofanallencompassingprognostictool
AT ariansnathalie validationofninedifferentprognosticgradingindexesforradiosurgeryofbrainmetastasesinbreastcancerpatientsanddevelopmentofanallencompassingprognostictool
AT regnerysebastian validationofninedifferentprognosticgradingindexesforradiosurgeryofbrainmetastasesinbreastcancerpatientsanddevelopmentofanallencompassingprognostictool
AT hoegenphilipp validationofninedifferentprognosticgradingindexesforradiosurgeryofbrainmetastasesinbreastcancerpatientsanddevelopmentofanallencompassingprognostictool
AT deutschthomasm validationofninedifferentprognosticgradingindexesforradiosurgeryofbrainmetastasesinbreastcancerpatientsanddevelopmentofanallencompassingprognostictool
AT schneeweissandreas validationofninedifferentprognosticgradingindexesforradiosurgeryofbrainmetastasesinbreastcancerpatientsanddevelopmentofanallencompassingprognostictool
AT debusjurgen validationofninedifferentprognosticgradingindexesforradiosurgeryofbrainmetastasesinbreastcancerpatientsanddevelopmentofanallencompassingprognostictool
AT hornerrieberjuliane validationofninedifferentprognosticgradingindexesforradiosurgeryofbrainmetastasesinbreastcancerpatientsanddevelopmentofanallencompassingprognostictool