Cargando…
A comparative evaluation between the Abbott Panbio™ COVID-19 IgG/IgM rapid test device and Abbott Architect™ SARS CoV-2 IgG assay
INTRODUCTION: Antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 serve as critical diagnostic markers for determining how broadly the COVID-19 pandemic has spread, confirming patient recovery, monitoring potential long-term effects of infection, and evaluating potential protection from reinfection. As new antibody tests beco...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7493757/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32961429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104645 |
_version_ | 1783582624863748096 |
---|---|
author | Batra, Rahul Olivieri, Luis Gonzalez Rubin, Delfin Vallari, Ana Pearce, Sandra Olivo, Ana Prostko, John Nebbia, Gaia Douthwaite, Sam Rodgers, Mary Cloherty, Gavin |
author_facet | Batra, Rahul Olivieri, Luis Gonzalez Rubin, Delfin Vallari, Ana Pearce, Sandra Olivo, Ana Prostko, John Nebbia, Gaia Douthwaite, Sam Rodgers, Mary Cloherty, Gavin |
author_sort | Batra, Rahul |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 serve as critical diagnostic markers for determining how broadly the COVID-19 pandemic has spread, confirming patient recovery, monitoring potential long-term effects of infection, and evaluating potential protection from reinfection. As new antibody tests become available, it is important to evaluate their performance and utility. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of the Abbott Panbio(TM) COVID-19 IgG/IgM Rapid Test Device against the Abbott Architect(TM) SARS CoV-2 IgG Assay for the detection of the COVID-19 IgG antibody. METHODS: Two panels of specimens were utilized to challenge both antibody tests: (1) a set of 150 prepandemic negative specimens collected in 2014, and (2) a set of 122 specimens from 87 hospitalized COVID-19 patients in the US and UK that were confirmed with a positive SARS-CoV-2 RNA test result. RESULTS: The Architect(TM) test had a specificity of 100 % and sensitivity of 99.1 % and 93.9 % when excluding or including immunocompromised patients, respectively for specimens collected >14 days post symptom onset or >5 days post-RNA testing. The Panbio(TM) test had 99.3 % agreement to Architect(TM). Notably, N = 6 immune-compromised individuals were identified that did not develop detectable antibodies by day 30. CONCLUSION: There is good concordance between the Architect(TM) SARS CoV-2 IgG Assay and Panbio(TM) COVID-19 IgG/IgM Rapid Test Device for the detection of SARS CoV-2 IgG. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7493757 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74937572020-09-17 A comparative evaluation between the Abbott Panbio™ COVID-19 IgG/IgM rapid test device and Abbott Architect™ SARS CoV-2 IgG assay Batra, Rahul Olivieri, Luis Gonzalez Rubin, Delfin Vallari, Ana Pearce, Sandra Olivo, Ana Prostko, John Nebbia, Gaia Douthwaite, Sam Rodgers, Mary Cloherty, Gavin J Clin Virol Article INTRODUCTION: Antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 serve as critical diagnostic markers for determining how broadly the COVID-19 pandemic has spread, confirming patient recovery, monitoring potential long-term effects of infection, and evaluating potential protection from reinfection. As new antibody tests become available, it is important to evaluate their performance and utility. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of the Abbott Panbio(TM) COVID-19 IgG/IgM Rapid Test Device against the Abbott Architect(TM) SARS CoV-2 IgG Assay for the detection of the COVID-19 IgG antibody. METHODS: Two panels of specimens were utilized to challenge both antibody tests: (1) a set of 150 prepandemic negative specimens collected in 2014, and (2) a set of 122 specimens from 87 hospitalized COVID-19 patients in the US and UK that were confirmed with a positive SARS-CoV-2 RNA test result. RESULTS: The Architect(TM) test had a specificity of 100 % and sensitivity of 99.1 % and 93.9 % when excluding or including immunocompromised patients, respectively for specimens collected >14 days post symptom onset or >5 days post-RNA testing. The Panbio(TM) test had 99.3 % agreement to Architect(TM). Notably, N = 6 immune-compromised individuals were identified that did not develop detectable antibodies by day 30. CONCLUSION: There is good concordance between the Architect(TM) SARS CoV-2 IgG Assay and Panbio(TM) COVID-19 IgG/IgM Rapid Test Device for the detection of SARS CoV-2 IgG. The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2020-11 2020-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7493757/ /pubmed/32961429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104645 Text en © 2020 The Authors Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Batra, Rahul Olivieri, Luis Gonzalez Rubin, Delfin Vallari, Ana Pearce, Sandra Olivo, Ana Prostko, John Nebbia, Gaia Douthwaite, Sam Rodgers, Mary Cloherty, Gavin A comparative evaluation between the Abbott Panbio™ COVID-19 IgG/IgM rapid test device and Abbott Architect™ SARS CoV-2 IgG assay |
title | A comparative evaluation between the Abbott Panbio™ COVID-19 IgG/IgM rapid test device and Abbott Architect™ SARS CoV-2 IgG assay |
title_full | A comparative evaluation between the Abbott Panbio™ COVID-19 IgG/IgM rapid test device and Abbott Architect™ SARS CoV-2 IgG assay |
title_fullStr | A comparative evaluation between the Abbott Panbio™ COVID-19 IgG/IgM rapid test device and Abbott Architect™ SARS CoV-2 IgG assay |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative evaluation between the Abbott Panbio™ COVID-19 IgG/IgM rapid test device and Abbott Architect™ SARS CoV-2 IgG assay |
title_short | A comparative evaluation between the Abbott Panbio™ COVID-19 IgG/IgM rapid test device and Abbott Architect™ SARS CoV-2 IgG assay |
title_sort | comparative evaluation between the abbott panbio™ covid-19 igg/igm rapid test device and abbott architect™ sars cov-2 igg assay |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7493757/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32961429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104645 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT batrarahul acomparativeevaluationbetweentheabbottpanbiocovid19iggigmrapidtestdeviceandabbottarchitectsarscov2iggassay AT olivieriluisgonzalez acomparativeevaluationbetweentheabbottpanbiocovid19iggigmrapidtestdeviceandabbottarchitectsarscov2iggassay AT rubindelfin acomparativeevaluationbetweentheabbottpanbiocovid19iggigmrapidtestdeviceandabbottarchitectsarscov2iggassay AT vallariana acomparativeevaluationbetweentheabbottpanbiocovid19iggigmrapidtestdeviceandabbottarchitectsarscov2iggassay AT pearcesandra acomparativeevaluationbetweentheabbottpanbiocovid19iggigmrapidtestdeviceandabbottarchitectsarscov2iggassay AT olivoana acomparativeevaluationbetweentheabbottpanbiocovid19iggigmrapidtestdeviceandabbottarchitectsarscov2iggassay AT prostkojohn acomparativeevaluationbetweentheabbottpanbiocovid19iggigmrapidtestdeviceandabbottarchitectsarscov2iggassay AT nebbiagaia acomparativeevaluationbetweentheabbottpanbiocovid19iggigmrapidtestdeviceandabbottarchitectsarscov2iggassay AT douthwaitesam acomparativeevaluationbetweentheabbottpanbiocovid19iggigmrapidtestdeviceandabbottarchitectsarscov2iggassay AT rodgersmary acomparativeevaluationbetweentheabbottpanbiocovid19iggigmrapidtestdeviceandabbottarchitectsarscov2iggassay AT clohertygavin acomparativeevaluationbetweentheabbottpanbiocovid19iggigmrapidtestdeviceandabbottarchitectsarscov2iggassay AT batrarahul comparativeevaluationbetweentheabbottpanbiocovid19iggigmrapidtestdeviceandabbottarchitectsarscov2iggassay AT olivieriluisgonzalez comparativeevaluationbetweentheabbottpanbiocovid19iggigmrapidtestdeviceandabbottarchitectsarscov2iggassay AT rubindelfin comparativeevaluationbetweentheabbottpanbiocovid19iggigmrapidtestdeviceandabbottarchitectsarscov2iggassay AT vallariana comparativeevaluationbetweentheabbottpanbiocovid19iggigmrapidtestdeviceandabbottarchitectsarscov2iggassay AT pearcesandra comparativeevaluationbetweentheabbottpanbiocovid19iggigmrapidtestdeviceandabbottarchitectsarscov2iggassay AT olivoana comparativeevaluationbetweentheabbottpanbiocovid19iggigmrapidtestdeviceandabbottarchitectsarscov2iggassay AT prostkojohn comparativeevaluationbetweentheabbottpanbiocovid19iggigmrapidtestdeviceandabbottarchitectsarscov2iggassay AT nebbiagaia comparativeevaluationbetweentheabbottpanbiocovid19iggigmrapidtestdeviceandabbottarchitectsarscov2iggassay AT douthwaitesam comparativeevaluationbetweentheabbottpanbiocovid19iggigmrapidtestdeviceandabbottarchitectsarscov2iggassay AT rodgersmary comparativeevaluationbetweentheabbottpanbiocovid19iggigmrapidtestdeviceandabbottarchitectsarscov2iggassay AT clohertygavin comparativeevaluationbetweentheabbottpanbiocovid19iggigmrapidtestdeviceandabbottarchitectsarscov2iggassay |