Cargando…

A Prognostic Model for Breast Cancer With Liver Metastasis

Background: Breast cancer with liver metastasis consists of a group of heterogeneous diseases, and survival time may be significantly different, ranging from a few months to several years. The present study aimed to develop and externally validate a prognostic model for breast cancer with liver meta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ji, Lei, Fan, Lei, Zhu, Xiuzhi, Gao, Yu, Wang, Zhonghua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7493788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33014776
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.01342
_version_ 1783582629313904640
author Ji, Lei
Fan, Lei
Zhu, Xiuzhi
Gao, Yu
Wang, Zhonghua
author_facet Ji, Lei
Fan, Lei
Zhu, Xiuzhi
Gao, Yu
Wang, Zhonghua
author_sort Ji, Lei
collection PubMed
description Background: Breast cancer with liver metastasis consists of a group of heterogeneous diseases, and survival time may be significantly different, ranging from a few months to several years. The present study aimed to develop and externally validate a prognostic model for breast cancer with liver metastasis (BCLM). Methods: In total, 1022 eligible patients from January 2007 to December 2018 were selected from Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC) and were temporally in the training (n = 715) and validation (n = 307) set. According to regression coefficients found in the multivariate Cox regression analysis, the final results were transformed into the prognostic scores. On the basis of these scores, patients were finally classified into three risk groups, including low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups. Bootstrapping was used for internal validation. Then, time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calibration plots were used to assess discrimination and calibration of this prognostic model in the validation set. Results: Molecular subtypes, metastatic-free interval (MFI), extrahepatic metastasis, and liver function tests were identified as independent prognostic factors in the multivariate analysis. According to risk stratification, intermediate-risk (hazard ratio (HR) 2.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.74–2.58, P < 0.001) and high-risk groups (HR 6.94, 95% CI 5.25–9.16, P < 0.001) had significantly worse prognoses in comparison with the low-risk group regarding overall survival (OS) from the time of metastasis. The median OS in these three groups were 39.97, 21.03, and 8.80 months, respectively. These results were confirmed in the internal and external validation cohorts. Conclusions: Based on molecular classification of tumors, routine laboratory tests, and other clinical information easily accessible in daily clinical practice, we developed a clinical tool for BCLM patients to predict their prognosis. Moreover, it may be useful for identifying the subgroup with unfavorable prognosis and individualization of treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7493788
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74937882020-10-02 A Prognostic Model for Breast Cancer With Liver Metastasis Ji, Lei Fan, Lei Zhu, Xiuzhi Gao, Yu Wang, Zhonghua Front Oncol Oncology Background: Breast cancer with liver metastasis consists of a group of heterogeneous diseases, and survival time may be significantly different, ranging from a few months to several years. The present study aimed to develop and externally validate a prognostic model for breast cancer with liver metastasis (BCLM). Methods: In total, 1022 eligible patients from January 2007 to December 2018 were selected from Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC) and were temporally in the training (n = 715) and validation (n = 307) set. According to regression coefficients found in the multivariate Cox regression analysis, the final results were transformed into the prognostic scores. On the basis of these scores, patients were finally classified into three risk groups, including low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups. Bootstrapping was used for internal validation. Then, time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calibration plots were used to assess discrimination and calibration of this prognostic model in the validation set. Results: Molecular subtypes, metastatic-free interval (MFI), extrahepatic metastasis, and liver function tests were identified as independent prognostic factors in the multivariate analysis. According to risk stratification, intermediate-risk (hazard ratio (HR) 2.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.74–2.58, P < 0.001) and high-risk groups (HR 6.94, 95% CI 5.25–9.16, P < 0.001) had significantly worse prognoses in comparison with the low-risk group regarding overall survival (OS) from the time of metastasis. The median OS in these three groups were 39.97, 21.03, and 8.80 months, respectively. These results were confirmed in the internal and external validation cohorts. Conclusions: Based on molecular classification of tumors, routine laboratory tests, and other clinical information easily accessible in daily clinical practice, we developed a clinical tool for BCLM patients to predict their prognosis. Moreover, it may be useful for identifying the subgroup with unfavorable prognosis and individualization of treatment. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7493788/ /pubmed/33014776 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.01342 Text en Copyright © 2020 Ji, Fan, Zhu, Gao and Wang. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Ji, Lei
Fan, Lei
Zhu, Xiuzhi
Gao, Yu
Wang, Zhonghua
A Prognostic Model for Breast Cancer With Liver Metastasis
title A Prognostic Model for Breast Cancer With Liver Metastasis
title_full A Prognostic Model for Breast Cancer With Liver Metastasis
title_fullStr A Prognostic Model for Breast Cancer With Liver Metastasis
title_full_unstemmed A Prognostic Model for Breast Cancer With Liver Metastasis
title_short A Prognostic Model for Breast Cancer With Liver Metastasis
title_sort prognostic model for breast cancer with liver metastasis
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7493788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33014776
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.01342
work_keys_str_mv AT jilei aprognosticmodelforbreastcancerwithlivermetastasis
AT fanlei aprognosticmodelforbreastcancerwithlivermetastasis
AT zhuxiuzhi aprognosticmodelforbreastcancerwithlivermetastasis
AT gaoyu aprognosticmodelforbreastcancerwithlivermetastasis
AT wangzhonghua aprognosticmodelforbreastcancerwithlivermetastasis
AT jilei prognosticmodelforbreastcancerwithlivermetastasis
AT fanlei prognosticmodelforbreastcancerwithlivermetastasis
AT zhuxiuzhi prognosticmodelforbreastcancerwithlivermetastasis
AT gaoyu prognosticmodelforbreastcancerwithlivermetastasis
AT wangzhonghua prognosticmodelforbreastcancerwithlivermetastasis