Cargando…

Functional outcomes after combined iris and intraocular lens implantation in various iris and lens defects

BACKGROUND: To assess the functional outcomes after combined iris and intraocular lens (IOL) repair in aniridia patients. METHODS: Retrospective observational study in 59 aniridic and aphakic eyes for ArtificialIris (AI) and IOL reconstruction. The iris prostheses were placed together with the IOL i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mayer, Christian S., Hoffmann, Andrea M., Prahs, Phillipp, Reznicek, Lukas, Khoramnia, Ramin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7493881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32933506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01621-8
_version_ 1783582646645817344
author Mayer, Christian S.
Hoffmann, Andrea M.
Prahs, Phillipp
Reznicek, Lukas
Khoramnia, Ramin
author_facet Mayer, Christian S.
Hoffmann, Andrea M.
Prahs, Phillipp
Reznicek, Lukas
Khoramnia, Ramin
author_sort Mayer, Christian S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To assess the functional outcomes after combined iris and intraocular lens (IOL) repair in aniridia patients. METHODS: Retrospective observational study in 59 aniridic and aphakic eyes for ArtificialIris (AI) and IOL reconstruction. The iris prostheses were placed together with the IOL in the capsular bag using an injection system or were fixed by transscleral suturing of the IOL and AI. The primary outcomes measured were visual acuity, contrast and glare sensitivity (Pelli-Robson chart for photopic and dark adaptometer for mesopic conditions), intraocular pressure, endothelial cell density (ECD) and patient impairment. RESULTS: Blunt trauma (37 eyes) and penetrating injuries (16 eyes) were observed more frequently than congenital aniridia (1 eye), iatrogenic causes (1 eye), aniridic state after severe iritis (2 eyes) or iris tumor (2 eyes). Monocular CDVA improved significantly (p < 0.0001) from median 0.7 logMAR (0.0–1.98) to 0.3 logMAR (− 0.08–2.0). Median pupillary area could significantly (p < 0.0001) be reduced by 79.3% from 51.27 mm(2) (17.91 to 98.23) to 8.81 mm(2) (4.16 to 8.84). Median ECD decreased from 2646.0 mm(2) to 2497.5 mm(2) (p = 0.007). Contrast and glare sensitivity improved significantly (p = 0.008) in photopic light conditions from 0.9 (0.0–1.95) to 1.35 (0.0–1.8). Patients reported to be highly satisfied with the functional improvement. CONCLUSION: The flexible ArtificialIris seems to be a safe and effective iris prosthesis in combination with an IOL having functionally and cosmetically exceptional reconstruction options.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7493881
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74938812020-09-23 Functional outcomes after combined iris and intraocular lens implantation in various iris and lens defects Mayer, Christian S. Hoffmann, Andrea M. Prahs, Phillipp Reznicek, Lukas Khoramnia, Ramin BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: To assess the functional outcomes after combined iris and intraocular lens (IOL) repair in aniridia patients. METHODS: Retrospective observational study in 59 aniridic and aphakic eyes for ArtificialIris (AI) and IOL reconstruction. The iris prostheses were placed together with the IOL in the capsular bag using an injection system or were fixed by transscleral suturing of the IOL and AI. The primary outcomes measured were visual acuity, contrast and glare sensitivity (Pelli-Robson chart for photopic and dark adaptometer for mesopic conditions), intraocular pressure, endothelial cell density (ECD) and patient impairment. RESULTS: Blunt trauma (37 eyes) and penetrating injuries (16 eyes) were observed more frequently than congenital aniridia (1 eye), iatrogenic causes (1 eye), aniridic state after severe iritis (2 eyes) or iris tumor (2 eyes). Monocular CDVA improved significantly (p < 0.0001) from median 0.7 logMAR (0.0–1.98) to 0.3 logMAR (− 0.08–2.0). Median pupillary area could significantly (p < 0.0001) be reduced by 79.3% from 51.27 mm(2) (17.91 to 98.23) to 8.81 mm(2) (4.16 to 8.84). Median ECD decreased from 2646.0 mm(2) to 2497.5 mm(2) (p = 0.007). Contrast and glare sensitivity improved significantly (p = 0.008) in photopic light conditions from 0.9 (0.0–1.95) to 1.35 (0.0–1.8). Patients reported to be highly satisfied with the functional improvement. CONCLUSION: The flexible ArtificialIris seems to be a safe and effective iris prosthesis in combination with an IOL having functionally and cosmetically exceptional reconstruction options. BioMed Central 2020-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7493881/ /pubmed/32933506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01621-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mayer, Christian S.
Hoffmann, Andrea M.
Prahs, Phillipp
Reznicek, Lukas
Khoramnia, Ramin
Functional outcomes after combined iris and intraocular lens implantation in various iris and lens defects
title Functional outcomes after combined iris and intraocular lens implantation in various iris and lens defects
title_full Functional outcomes after combined iris and intraocular lens implantation in various iris and lens defects
title_fullStr Functional outcomes after combined iris and intraocular lens implantation in various iris and lens defects
title_full_unstemmed Functional outcomes after combined iris and intraocular lens implantation in various iris and lens defects
title_short Functional outcomes after combined iris and intraocular lens implantation in various iris and lens defects
title_sort functional outcomes after combined iris and intraocular lens implantation in various iris and lens defects
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7493881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32933506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01621-8
work_keys_str_mv AT mayerchristians functionaloutcomesaftercombinedirisandintraocularlensimplantationinvariousirisandlensdefects
AT hoffmannandream functionaloutcomesaftercombinedirisandintraocularlensimplantationinvariousirisandlensdefects
AT prahsphillipp functionaloutcomesaftercombinedirisandintraocularlensimplantationinvariousirisandlensdefects
AT rezniceklukas functionaloutcomesaftercombinedirisandintraocularlensimplantationinvariousirisandlensdefects
AT khoramniaramin functionaloutcomesaftercombinedirisandintraocularlensimplantationinvariousirisandlensdefects