Cargando…
Beta oscillations following performance feedback predict subsequent recall of task-relevant information
Reward delivery in reinforcement learning tasks elicits increased beta power in the human EEG over frontal areas of the scalp but it is unclear whether these 20–30 Hz oscillations directly facilitate reward learning. We previously proposed that frontal beta is not specific to reward processing but r...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7493892/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32934274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72128-x |
_version_ | 1783582648948490240 |
---|---|
author | HajiHosseini, Azadeh Hutcherson, Cendri A. Holroyd, Clay B. |
author_facet | HajiHosseini, Azadeh Hutcherson, Cendri A. Holroyd, Clay B. |
author_sort | HajiHosseini, Azadeh |
collection | PubMed |
description | Reward delivery in reinforcement learning tasks elicits increased beta power in the human EEG over frontal areas of the scalp but it is unclear whether these 20–30 Hz oscillations directly facilitate reward learning. We previously proposed that frontal beta is not specific to reward processing but rather reflects the role of prefrontal cortex in maintaining and transferring task-related information to other brain areas. To test this proposal, we had subjects perform a reinforcement learning task followed by a memory recall task in which subjects were asked to recall stimuli associated either with reward feedback (Reward Recall condition) or error feedback (Error Recall condition). We trained a classifier on post-feedback beta power in the Reward Recall condition to discriminate trials associated with reward feedback from those associated with error feedback and then tested the classifier on post-feedback beta power in the Error Recall condition. Crucially, the model classified error-related beta in the Error Recall condition as reward-related. The model also predicted stimulus recall from post-feedback beta power irrespective of feedback valence and task condition. These results indicate that post-feedback beta power is not specific to reward processing but rather reflects a more general task-related process. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7493892 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74938922020-09-16 Beta oscillations following performance feedback predict subsequent recall of task-relevant information HajiHosseini, Azadeh Hutcherson, Cendri A. Holroyd, Clay B. Sci Rep Article Reward delivery in reinforcement learning tasks elicits increased beta power in the human EEG over frontal areas of the scalp but it is unclear whether these 20–30 Hz oscillations directly facilitate reward learning. We previously proposed that frontal beta is not specific to reward processing but rather reflects the role of prefrontal cortex in maintaining and transferring task-related information to other brain areas. To test this proposal, we had subjects perform a reinforcement learning task followed by a memory recall task in which subjects were asked to recall stimuli associated either with reward feedback (Reward Recall condition) or error feedback (Error Recall condition). We trained a classifier on post-feedback beta power in the Reward Recall condition to discriminate trials associated with reward feedback from those associated with error feedback and then tested the classifier on post-feedback beta power in the Error Recall condition. Crucially, the model classified error-related beta in the Error Recall condition as reward-related. The model also predicted stimulus recall from post-feedback beta power irrespective of feedback valence and task condition. These results indicate that post-feedback beta power is not specific to reward processing but rather reflects a more general task-related process. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7493892/ /pubmed/32934274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72128-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article HajiHosseini, Azadeh Hutcherson, Cendri A. Holroyd, Clay B. Beta oscillations following performance feedback predict subsequent recall of task-relevant information |
title | Beta oscillations following performance feedback predict subsequent recall of task-relevant information |
title_full | Beta oscillations following performance feedback predict subsequent recall of task-relevant information |
title_fullStr | Beta oscillations following performance feedback predict subsequent recall of task-relevant information |
title_full_unstemmed | Beta oscillations following performance feedback predict subsequent recall of task-relevant information |
title_short | Beta oscillations following performance feedback predict subsequent recall of task-relevant information |
title_sort | beta oscillations following performance feedback predict subsequent recall of task-relevant information |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7493892/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32934274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72128-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hajihosseiniazadeh betaoscillationsfollowingperformancefeedbackpredictsubsequentrecalloftaskrelevantinformation AT hutchersoncendria betaoscillationsfollowingperformancefeedbackpredictsubsequentrecalloftaskrelevantinformation AT holroydclayb betaoscillationsfollowingperformancefeedbackpredictsubsequentrecalloftaskrelevantinformation |