Cargando…

Beta oscillations following performance feedback predict subsequent recall of task-relevant information

Reward delivery in reinforcement learning tasks elicits increased beta power in the human EEG over frontal areas of the scalp but it is unclear whether these 20–30 Hz oscillations directly facilitate reward learning. We previously proposed that frontal beta is not specific to reward processing but r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: HajiHosseini, Azadeh, Hutcherson, Cendri A., Holroyd, Clay B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7493892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32934274
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72128-x
_version_ 1783582648948490240
author HajiHosseini, Azadeh
Hutcherson, Cendri A.
Holroyd, Clay B.
author_facet HajiHosseini, Azadeh
Hutcherson, Cendri A.
Holroyd, Clay B.
author_sort HajiHosseini, Azadeh
collection PubMed
description Reward delivery in reinforcement learning tasks elicits increased beta power in the human EEG over frontal areas of the scalp but it is unclear whether these 20–30 Hz oscillations directly facilitate reward learning. We previously proposed that frontal beta is not specific to reward processing but rather reflects the role of prefrontal cortex in maintaining and transferring task-related information to other brain areas. To test this proposal, we had subjects perform a reinforcement learning task followed by a memory recall task in which subjects were asked to recall stimuli associated either with reward feedback (Reward Recall condition) or error feedback (Error Recall condition). We trained a classifier on post-feedback beta power in the Reward Recall condition to discriminate trials associated with reward feedback from those associated with error feedback and then tested the classifier on post-feedback beta power in the Error Recall condition. Crucially, the model classified error-related beta in the Error Recall condition as reward-related. The model also predicted stimulus recall from post-feedback beta power irrespective of feedback valence and task condition. These results indicate that post-feedback beta power is not specific to reward processing but rather reflects a more general task-related process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7493892
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74938922020-09-16 Beta oscillations following performance feedback predict subsequent recall of task-relevant information HajiHosseini, Azadeh Hutcherson, Cendri A. Holroyd, Clay B. Sci Rep Article Reward delivery in reinforcement learning tasks elicits increased beta power in the human EEG over frontal areas of the scalp but it is unclear whether these 20–30 Hz oscillations directly facilitate reward learning. We previously proposed that frontal beta is not specific to reward processing but rather reflects the role of prefrontal cortex in maintaining and transferring task-related information to other brain areas. To test this proposal, we had subjects perform a reinforcement learning task followed by a memory recall task in which subjects were asked to recall stimuli associated either with reward feedback (Reward Recall condition) or error feedback (Error Recall condition). We trained a classifier on post-feedback beta power in the Reward Recall condition to discriminate trials associated with reward feedback from those associated with error feedback and then tested the classifier on post-feedback beta power in the Error Recall condition. Crucially, the model classified error-related beta in the Error Recall condition as reward-related. The model also predicted stimulus recall from post-feedback beta power irrespective of feedback valence and task condition. These results indicate that post-feedback beta power is not specific to reward processing but rather reflects a more general task-related process. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7493892/ /pubmed/32934274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72128-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
HajiHosseini, Azadeh
Hutcherson, Cendri A.
Holroyd, Clay B.
Beta oscillations following performance feedback predict subsequent recall of task-relevant information
title Beta oscillations following performance feedback predict subsequent recall of task-relevant information
title_full Beta oscillations following performance feedback predict subsequent recall of task-relevant information
title_fullStr Beta oscillations following performance feedback predict subsequent recall of task-relevant information
title_full_unstemmed Beta oscillations following performance feedback predict subsequent recall of task-relevant information
title_short Beta oscillations following performance feedback predict subsequent recall of task-relevant information
title_sort beta oscillations following performance feedback predict subsequent recall of task-relevant information
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7493892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32934274
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72128-x
work_keys_str_mv AT hajihosseiniazadeh betaoscillationsfollowingperformancefeedbackpredictsubsequentrecalloftaskrelevantinformation
AT hutchersoncendria betaoscillationsfollowingperformancefeedbackpredictsubsequentrecalloftaskrelevantinformation
AT holroydclayb betaoscillationsfollowingperformancefeedbackpredictsubsequentrecalloftaskrelevantinformation