Cargando…

The infant mummy’s face—Paleoradiological investigation and comparison between facial reconstruction and mummy portrait of a Roman-period Egyptian child

In Graeco-Roman times in the Lower-Egyptian Fayoum region, a painted portrait was traditionally placed over the face of a deceased individual. These mummy portraits show considerable inter-individual diversity. This suggests that those portraits were created separately for each individual. In the pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nerlich, Andreas G., Fischer, Lukas, Panzer, Stephanie, Bicker, Roxane, Helmberger, Thomas, Schoske, Sylvia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7494087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32936816
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238427
_version_ 1783582681212125184
author Nerlich, Andreas G.
Fischer, Lukas
Panzer, Stephanie
Bicker, Roxane
Helmberger, Thomas
Schoske, Sylvia
author_facet Nerlich, Andreas G.
Fischer, Lukas
Panzer, Stephanie
Bicker, Roxane
Helmberger, Thomas
Schoske, Sylvia
author_sort Nerlich, Andreas G.
collection PubMed
description In Graeco-Roman times in the Lower-Egyptian Fayoum region, a painted portrait was traditionally placed over the face of a deceased individual. These mummy portraits show considerable inter-individual diversity. This suggests that those portraits were created separately for each individual. In the present study, we investigated a completely wrapped young infant mummy with a typical mummy portrait by whole body CT analysis. This was used to obtain physical information on the infant and provided the basis for a virtual face reconstruction in order to compare it to the mummy portrait. We identified the mummy as a 3–4 years old male infant that had been prepared according to the typical ancient Egyptian mummification rites. It most probably suffered from a right-sided pulmonary infection which may also be the cause of death. The reconstructed face showed considerable similarities to the portrait, confirming the portrait’s specificity to this individual. However, there are some differences between portrait and face. The portrait seems to show a slightly older individual which may be due to artistic conventions of that period.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7494087
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74940872020-09-24 The infant mummy’s face—Paleoradiological investigation and comparison between facial reconstruction and mummy portrait of a Roman-period Egyptian child Nerlich, Andreas G. Fischer, Lukas Panzer, Stephanie Bicker, Roxane Helmberger, Thomas Schoske, Sylvia PLoS One Research Article In Graeco-Roman times in the Lower-Egyptian Fayoum region, a painted portrait was traditionally placed over the face of a deceased individual. These mummy portraits show considerable inter-individual diversity. This suggests that those portraits were created separately for each individual. In the present study, we investigated a completely wrapped young infant mummy with a typical mummy portrait by whole body CT analysis. This was used to obtain physical information on the infant and provided the basis for a virtual face reconstruction in order to compare it to the mummy portrait. We identified the mummy as a 3–4 years old male infant that had been prepared according to the typical ancient Egyptian mummification rites. It most probably suffered from a right-sided pulmonary infection which may also be the cause of death. The reconstructed face showed considerable similarities to the portrait, confirming the portrait’s specificity to this individual. However, there are some differences between portrait and face. The portrait seems to show a slightly older individual which may be due to artistic conventions of that period. Public Library of Science 2020-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7494087/ /pubmed/32936816 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238427 Text en © 2020 Nerlich et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nerlich, Andreas G.
Fischer, Lukas
Panzer, Stephanie
Bicker, Roxane
Helmberger, Thomas
Schoske, Sylvia
The infant mummy’s face—Paleoradiological investigation and comparison between facial reconstruction and mummy portrait of a Roman-period Egyptian child
title The infant mummy’s face—Paleoradiological investigation and comparison between facial reconstruction and mummy portrait of a Roman-period Egyptian child
title_full The infant mummy’s face—Paleoradiological investigation and comparison between facial reconstruction and mummy portrait of a Roman-period Egyptian child
title_fullStr The infant mummy’s face—Paleoradiological investigation and comparison between facial reconstruction and mummy portrait of a Roman-period Egyptian child
title_full_unstemmed The infant mummy’s face—Paleoradiological investigation and comparison between facial reconstruction and mummy portrait of a Roman-period Egyptian child
title_short The infant mummy’s face—Paleoradiological investigation and comparison between facial reconstruction and mummy portrait of a Roman-period Egyptian child
title_sort infant mummy’s face—paleoradiological investigation and comparison between facial reconstruction and mummy portrait of a roman-period egyptian child
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7494087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32936816
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238427
work_keys_str_mv AT nerlichandreasg theinfantmummysfacepaleoradiologicalinvestigationandcomparisonbetweenfacialreconstructionandmummyportraitofaromanperiodegyptianchild
AT fischerlukas theinfantmummysfacepaleoradiologicalinvestigationandcomparisonbetweenfacialreconstructionandmummyportraitofaromanperiodegyptianchild
AT panzerstephanie theinfantmummysfacepaleoradiologicalinvestigationandcomparisonbetweenfacialreconstructionandmummyportraitofaromanperiodegyptianchild
AT bickerroxane theinfantmummysfacepaleoradiologicalinvestigationandcomparisonbetweenfacialreconstructionandmummyportraitofaromanperiodegyptianchild
AT helmbergerthomas theinfantmummysfacepaleoradiologicalinvestigationandcomparisonbetweenfacialreconstructionandmummyportraitofaromanperiodegyptianchild
AT schoskesylvia theinfantmummysfacepaleoradiologicalinvestigationandcomparisonbetweenfacialreconstructionandmummyportraitofaromanperiodegyptianchild
AT nerlichandreasg infantmummysfacepaleoradiologicalinvestigationandcomparisonbetweenfacialreconstructionandmummyportraitofaromanperiodegyptianchild
AT fischerlukas infantmummysfacepaleoradiologicalinvestigationandcomparisonbetweenfacialreconstructionandmummyportraitofaromanperiodegyptianchild
AT panzerstephanie infantmummysfacepaleoradiologicalinvestigationandcomparisonbetweenfacialreconstructionandmummyportraitofaromanperiodegyptianchild
AT bickerroxane infantmummysfacepaleoradiologicalinvestigationandcomparisonbetweenfacialreconstructionandmummyportraitofaromanperiodegyptianchild
AT helmbergerthomas infantmummysfacepaleoradiologicalinvestigationandcomparisonbetweenfacialreconstructionandmummyportraitofaromanperiodegyptianchild
AT schoskesylvia infantmummysfacepaleoradiologicalinvestigationandcomparisonbetweenfacialreconstructionandmummyportraitofaromanperiodegyptianchild