Cargando…
Impact of review method on the conclusions of clinical reviews: A systematic review on dietary interventions in depression as a case in point
BACKGROUND: The recommendations of experts who write review articles are a critical determinant of the adaptation of new treatments by clinicians. Several types of reviews exist (narrative, systematic, meta-analytic), and some of these are more vulnerable to researcher bias than others. Recently, th...
Autores principales: | Thomas-Odenthal, Florian, Molero, Patricio, van der Does, Willem, Molendijk, Marc |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7494108/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32936801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238131 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Magnesium and mood disorders: systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Phelan, Danny, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
n-3 PUFAs for depression: treatment effect or absence-of-placebo effect?
por: Memarpouri, Arian, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
COVID-19 risk, course and outcome in people with mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analyses
por: Molero, Patricio, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
The SMILES trial: do undisclosed recruitment practices explain the remarkably large effect?
por: Molendijk, Marc L., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Systematic Reviews in Neonatal Respiratory Care: Are Some Conclusions Misleading?
por: Maturana, Andres, et al.
Publicado: (2020)