Cargando…
Diagnostic Accuracy of T-SPOT.TB Assay for Tuberculous Meningitis: An Updated Meta-Analysis
Background: The role of T-SPOT.TB (T-SPOT) assay for tuberculous meningitis (TBM) diagnosis has not been fully assessed. Here, we conducted an updated meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of peripheral blood (PB) T-SPOT and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) T-SPOT for diagnosing TBM. Methods: R...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7494808/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33013621 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00866 |
_version_ | 1783582802624643072 |
---|---|
author | Luo, Ying Xue, Ying Guo, Xueyun Lin, Qun Mao, Liyan Tang, Guoxing Song, Huijuan Wang, Feng Sun, Ziyong |
author_facet | Luo, Ying Xue, Ying Guo, Xueyun Lin, Qun Mao, Liyan Tang, Guoxing Song, Huijuan Wang, Feng Sun, Ziyong |
author_sort | Luo, Ying |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The role of T-SPOT.TB (T-SPOT) assay for tuberculous meningitis (TBM) diagnosis has not been fully assessed. Here, we conducted an updated meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of peripheral blood (PB) T-SPOT and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) T-SPOT for diagnosing TBM. Methods: Relevant studies in the PubMed database, EmBase database, Cochrane database, Scopus database, Google Scholar, China National Knowledge Internet, and Wan-Fang database were retrieved from August 1, 2005, to June 22, 2020. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata, Revman, and Meta-Disc software. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), summary receiver operating characteristic curves, and the area under the curve were determined and analyzed. Results: A total of 27 studies were eligible for inclusion within the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of PB T-SPOT for TBM diagnosis were 0.78 (95% CI, 0.76–0.81) and 0.68 (95% CI, 0.66–0.71), respectively, whereas the pooled PLR, NLR, and DOR were 2.80 (95% CI, 2.29–3.42), 0.32 (95% CI, 0.27–0.38), and 10.08 (95% CI, 7.21–14.08), respectively. On the other hand, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of CSF T-SPOT on diagnosing TBM were 0.76 (95% CI, 0.72–0.80) and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.85–0.90), respectively, whereas the pooled PLR, NLR, and DOR were 5.92 (95% CI, 4.25–8.25), 0.28 (95% CI, 0.21–0.39), and 29.05 (95% CI, 16.40–51.45), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve values of PB T-SPOT and CSF T-SPOT for TBM diagnosis were 0.83 (95% CI, 0.80–0.86) and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.89–0.94), respectively. Conclusions: CSF T-SPOT showed a higher specificity compared with PB T-SPOT for diagnosing TBM. Both two T-SPOT assays have considerable potential in improving the diagnosis of TBM. Furthermore, the standardization of the operating procedure is further needed when performing CSF T-SPOT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7494808 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74948082020-10-02 Diagnostic Accuracy of T-SPOT.TB Assay for Tuberculous Meningitis: An Updated Meta-Analysis Luo, Ying Xue, Ying Guo, Xueyun Lin, Qun Mao, Liyan Tang, Guoxing Song, Huijuan Wang, Feng Sun, Ziyong Front Neurol Neurology Background: The role of T-SPOT.TB (T-SPOT) assay for tuberculous meningitis (TBM) diagnosis has not been fully assessed. Here, we conducted an updated meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of peripheral blood (PB) T-SPOT and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) T-SPOT for diagnosing TBM. Methods: Relevant studies in the PubMed database, EmBase database, Cochrane database, Scopus database, Google Scholar, China National Knowledge Internet, and Wan-Fang database were retrieved from August 1, 2005, to June 22, 2020. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata, Revman, and Meta-Disc software. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), summary receiver operating characteristic curves, and the area under the curve were determined and analyzed. Results: A total of 27 studies were eligible for inclusion within the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of PB T-SPOT for TBM diagnosis were 0.78 (95% CI, 0.76–0.81) and 0.68 (95% CI, 0.66–0.71), respectively, whereas the pooled PLR, NLR, and DOR were 2.80 (95% CI, 2.29–3.42), 0.32 (95% CI, 0.27–0.38), and 10.08 (95% CI, 7.21–14.08), respectively. On the other hand, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of CSF T-SPOT on diagnosing TBM were 0.76 (95% CI, 0.72–0.80) and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.85–0.90), respectively, whereas the pooled PLR, NLR, and DOR were 5.92 (95% CI, 4.25–8.25), 0.28 (95% CI, 0.21–0.39), and 29.05 (95% CI, 16.40–51.45), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve values of PB T-SPOT and CSF T-SPOT for TBM diagnosis were 0.83 (95% CI, 0.80–0.86) and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.89–0.94), respectively. Conclusions: CSF T-SPOT showed a higher specificity compared with PB T-SPOT for diagnosing TBM. Both two T-SPOT assays have considerable potential in improving the diagnosis of TBM. Furthermore, the standardization of the operating procedure is further needed when performing CSF T-SPOT. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7494808/ /pubmed/33013621 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00866 Text en Copyright © 2020 Luo, Xue, Guo, Lin, Mao, Tang, Song, Wang and Sun. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neurology Luo, Ying Xue, Ying Guo, Xueyun Lin, Qun Mao, Liyan Tang, Guoxing Song, Huijuan Wang, Feng Sun, Ziyong Diagnostic Accuracy of T-SPOT.TB Assay for Tuberculous Meningitis: An Updated Meta-Analysis |
title | Diagnostic Accuracy of T-SPOT.TB Assay for Tuberculous Meningitis: An Updated Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Diagnostic Accuracy of T-SPOT.TB Assay for Tuberculous Meningitis: An Updated Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic Accuracy of T-SPOT.TB Assay for Tuberculous Meningitis: An Updated Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic Accuracy of T-SPOT.TB Assay for Tuberculous Meningitis: An Updated Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Diagnostic Accuracy of T-SPOT.TB Assay for Tuberculous Meningitis: An Updated Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | diagnostic accuracy of t-spot.tb assay for tuberculous meningitis: an updated meta-analysis |
topic | Neurology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7494808/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33013621 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00866 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT luoying diagnosticaccuracyoftspottbassayfortuberculousmeningitisanupdatedmetaanalysis AT xueying diagnosticaccuracyoftspottbassayfortuberculousmeningitisanupdatedmetaanalysis AT guoxueyun diagnosticaccuracyoftspottbassayfortuberculousmeningitisanupdatedmetaanalysis AT linqun diagnosticaccuracyoftspottbassayfortuberculousmeningitisanupdatedmetaanalysis AT maoliyan diagnosticaccuracyoftspottbassayfortuberculousmeningitisanupdatedmetaanalysis AT tangguoxing diagnosticaccuracyoftspottbassayfortuberculousmeningitisanupdatedmetaanalysis AT songhuijuan diagnosticaccuracyoftspottbassayfortuberculousmeningitisanupdatedmetaanalysis AT wangfeng diagnosticaccuracyoftspottbassayfortuberculousmeningitisanupdatedmetaanalysis AT sunziyong diagnosticaccuracyoftspottbassayfortuberculousmeningitisanupdatedmetaanalysis |