Cargando…

Diagnostic Accuracy of T-SPOT.TB Assay for Tuberculous Meningitis: An Updated Meta-Analysis

Background: The role of T-SPOT.TB (T-SPOT) assay for tuberculous meningitis (TBM) diagnosis has not been fully assessed. Here, we conducted an updated meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of peripheral blood (PB) T-SPOT and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) T-SPOT for diagnosing TBM. Methods: R...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luo, Ying, Xue, Ying, Guo, Xueyun, Lin, Qun, Mao, Liyan, Tang, Guoxing, Song, Huijuan, Wang, Feng, Sun, Ziyong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7494808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33013621
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00866
_version_ 1783582802624643072
author Luo, Ying
Xue, Ying
Guo, Xueyun
Lin, Qun
Mao, Liyan
Tang, Guoxing
Song, Huijuan
Wang, Feng
Sun, Ziyong
author_facet Luo, Ying
Xue, Ying
Guo, Xueyun
Lin, Qun
Mao, Liyan
Tang, Guoxing
Song, Huijuan
Wang, Feng
Sun, Ziyong
author_sort Luo, Ying
collection PubMed
description Background: The role of T-SPOT.TB (T-SPOT) assay for tuberculous meningitis (TBM) diagnosis has not been fully assessed. Here, we conducted an updated meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of peripheral blood (PB) T-SPOT and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) T-SPOT for diagnosing TBM. Methods: Relevant studies in the PubMed database, EmBase database, Cochrane database, Scopus database, Google Scholar, China National Knowledge Internet, and Wan-Fang database were retrieved from August 1, 2005, to June 22, 2020. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata, Revman, and Meta-Disc software. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), summary receiver operating characteristic curves, and the area under the curve were determined and analyzed. Results: A total of 27 studies were eligible for inclusion within the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of PB T-SPOT for TBM diagnosis were 0.78 (95% CI, 0.76–0.81) and 0.68 (95% CI, 0.66–0.71), respectively, whereas the pooled PLR, NLR, and DOR were 2.80 (95% CI, 2.29–3.42), 0.32 (95% CI, 0.27–0.38), and 10.08 (95% CI, 7.21–14.08), respectively. On the other hand, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of CSF T-SPOT on diagnosing TBM were 0.76 (95% CI, 0.72–0.80) and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.85–0.90), respectively, whereas the pooled PLR, NLR, and DOR were 5.92 (95% CI, 4.25–8.25), 0.28 (95% CI, 0.21–0.39), and 29.05 (95% CI, 16.40–51.45), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve values of PB T-SPOT and CSF T-SPOT for TBM diagnosis were 0.83 (95% CI, 0.80–0.86) and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.89–0.94), respectively. Conclusions: CSF T-SPOT showed a higher specificity compared with PB T-SPOT for diagnosing TBM. Both two T-SPOT assays have considerable potential in improving the diagnosis of TBM. Furthermore, the standardization of the operating procedure is further needed when performing CSF T-SPOT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7494808
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74948082020-10-02 Diagnostic Accuracy of T-SPOT.TB Assay for Tuberculous Meningitis: An Updated Meta-Analysis Luo, Ying Xue, Ying Guo, Xueyun Lin, Qun Mao, Liyan Tang, Guoxing Song, Huijuan Wang, Feng Sun, Ziyong Front Neurol Neurology Background: The role of T-SPOT.TB (T-SPOT) assay for tuberculous meningitis (TBM) diagnosis has not been fully assessed. Here, we conducted an updated meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of peripheral blood (PB) T-SPOT and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) T-SPOT for diagnosing TBM. Methods: Relevant studies in the PubMed database, EmBase database, Cochrane database, Scopus database, Google Scholar, China National Knowledge Internet, and Wan-Fang database were retrieved from August 1, 2005, to June 22, 2020. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata, Revman, and Meta-Disc software. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), summary receiver operating characteristic curves, and the area under the curve were determined and analyzed. Results: A total of 27 studies were eligible for inclusion within the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of PB T-SPOT for TBM diagnosis were 0.78 (95% CI, 0.76–0.81) and 0.68 (95% CI, 0.66–0.71), respectively, whereas the pooled PLR, NLR, and DOR were 2.80 (95% CI, 2.29–3.42), 0.32 (95% CI, 0.27–0.38), and 10.08 (95% CI, 7.21–14.08), respectively. On the other hand, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of CSF T-SPOT on diagnosing TBM were 0.76 (95% CI, 0.72–0.80) and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.85–0.90), respectively, whereas the pooled PLR, NLR, and DOR were 5.92 (95% CI, 4.25–8.25), 0.28 (95% CI, 0.21–0.39), and 29.05 (95% CI, 16.40–51.45), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve values of PB T-SPOT and CSF T-SPOT for TBM diagnosis were 0.83 (95% CI, 0.80–0.86) and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.89–0.94), respectively. Conclusions: CSF T-SPOT showed a higher specificity compared with PB T-SPOT for diagnosing TBM. Both two T-SPOT assays have considerable potential in improving the diagnosis of TBM. Furthermore, the standardization of the operating procedure is further needed when performing CSF T-SPOT. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7494808/ /pubmed/33013621 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00866 Text en Copyright © 2020 Luo, Xue, Guo, Lin, Mao, Tang, Song, Wang and Sun. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Luo, Ying
Xue, Ying
Guo, Xueyun
Lin, Qun
Mao, Liyan
Tang, Guoxing
Song, Huijuan
Wang, Feng
Sun, Ziyong
Diagnostic Accuracy of T-SPOT.TB Assay for Tuberculous Meningitis: An Updated Meta-Analysis
title Diagnostic Accuracy of T-SPOT.TB Assay for Tuberculous Meningitis: An Updated Meta-Analysis
title_full Diagnostic Accuracy of T-SPOT.TB Assay for Tuberculous Meningitis: An Updated Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Diagnostic Accuracy of T-SPOT.TB Assay for Tuberculous Meningitis: An Updated Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Accuracy of T-SPOT.TB Assay for Tuberculous Meningitis: An Updated Meta-Analysis
title_short Diagnostic Accuracy of T-SPOT.TB Assay for Tuberculous Meningitis: An Updated Meta-Analysis
title_sort diagnostic accuracy of t-spot.tb assay for tuberculous meningitis: an updated meta-analysis
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7494808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33013621
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00866
work_keys_str_mv AT luoying diagnosticaccuracyoftspottbassayfortuberculousmeningitisanupdatedmetaanalysis
AT xueying diagnosticaccuracyoftspottbassayfortuberculousmeningitisanupdatedmetaanalysis
AT guoxueyun diagnosticaccuracyoftspottbassayfortuberculousmeningitisanupdatedmetaanalysis
AT linqun diagnosticaccuracyoftspottbassayfortuberculousmeningitisanupdatedmetaanalysis
AT maoliyan diagnosticaccuracyoftspottbassayfortuberculousmeningitisanupdatedmetaanalysis
AT tangguoxing diagnosticaccuracyoftspottbassayfortuberculousmeningitisanupdatedmetaanalysis
AT songhuijuan diagnosticaccuracyoftspottbassayfortuberculousmeningitisanupdatedmetaanalysis
AT wangfeng diagnosticaccuracyoftspottbassayfortuberculousmeningitisanupdatedmetaanalysis
AT sunziyong diagnosticaccuracyoftspottbassayfortuberculousmeningitisanupdatedmetaanalysis