Cargando…

Comparing Programming Sessions of Vim-DBS

Background: Essential Tremor (ET) is a progressive neurological disorder characterized by postural and kinetic tremor most commonly affecting the hands and arms. Medically intractable ET can be treated by deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral intermediate nucleus of thalamus (VIM). We investig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reitz, Sarah C., Luger, Sebastian, Lapa, Sriramya, Eibach, Michael, Filmann, Natalie, Seifert, Volker, Weise, Lutz, Klein, Johannes C., Kang, Jun-Suk, Baudrexel, Simon, Quick-Weller, Johanna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7494809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33013651
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00987
_version_ 1783582802859524096
author Reitz, Sarah C.
Luger, Sebastian
Lapa, Sriramya
Eibach, Michael
Filmann, Natalie
Seifert, Volker
Weise, Lutz
Klein, Johannes C.
Kang, Jun-Suk
Baudrexel, Simon
Quick-Weller, Johanna
author_facet Reitz, Sarah C.
Luger, Sebastian
Lapa, Sriramya
Eibach, Michael
Filmann, Natalie
Seifert, Volker
Weise, Lutz
Klein, Johannes C.
Kang, Jun-Suk
Baudrexel, Simon
Quick-Weller, Johanna
author_sort Reitz, Sarah C.
collection PubMed
description Background: Essential Tremor (ET) is a progressive neurological disorder characterized by postural and kinetic tremor most commonly affecting the hands and arms. Medically intractable ET can be treated by deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral intermediate nucleus of thalamus (VIM). We investigated whether the location of the effective contact (most tremor suppression with at least side effects) in VIM-DBS for ET changes over time, indicating a distinct mechanism of loss of efficacy that goes beyond progression of tremor severity, or a mere reduction of DBS efficacy. Methods: We performed programming sessions in 10 patients who underwent bilateral vim-DBS surgery between 2009 and 2017 at our department. In addition to the intraoperative (T1) and first clinical programming session (T2) a third programming session (T3) was performed to assess the effect- and side effect threshold (minimum voltage at which a tremor suppression or side effects occurred). Additionally, we compared the choice of the effective contact between T1 and T2 which might be affected by a surgical induced “brain shift.” Discussion: Over a time span of about 4 years VIM-DBS in ET showed continuous efficacy in tremor suppression during stim-ON compared to stim-OFF. Compared to immediate postoperative programming sessions in ET-patients with DBS, long-term evaluation showed no relevant change in the choice of contact with respect to side effects and efficacy. In the majority of the cases the active contact at T2 did not correspond to the most effective intraoperative stimulation site T1, which might be explained by a brain-shift due to cerebral spinal fluid loss after neurosurgical procedure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7494809
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74948092020-10-02 Comparing Programming Sessions of Vim-DBS Reitz, Sarah C. Luger, Sebastian Lapa, Sriramya Eibach, Michael Filmann, Natalie Seifert, Volker Weise, Lutz Klein, Johannes C. Kang, Jun-Suk Baudrexel, Simon Quick-Weller, Johanna Front Neurol Neurology Background: Essential Tremor (ET) is a progressive neurological disorder characterized by postural and kinetic tremor most commonly affecting the hands and arms. Medically intractable ET can be treated by deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral intermediate nucleus of thalamus (VIM). We investigated whether the location of the effective contact (most tremor suppression with at least side effects) in VIM-DBS for ET changes over time, indicating a distinct mechanism of loss of efficacy that goes beyond progression of tremor severity, or a mere reduction of DBS efficacy. Methods: We performed programming sessions in 10 patients who underwent bilateral vim-DBS surgery between 2009 and 2017 at our department. In addition to the intraoperative (T1) and first clinical programming session (T2) a third programming session (T3) was performed to assess the effect- and side effect threshold (minimum voltage at which a tremor suppression or side effects occurred). Additionally, we compared the choice of the effective contact between T1 and T2 which might be affected by a surgical induced “brain shift.” Discussion: Over a time span of about 4 years VIM-DBS in ET showed continuous efficacy in tremor suppression during stim-ON compared to stim-OFF. Compared to immediate postoperative programming sessions in ET-patients with DBS, long-term evaluation showed no relevant change in the choice of contact with respect to side effects and efficacy. In the majority of the cases the active contact at T2 did not correspond to the most effective intraoperative stimulation site T1, which might be explained by a brain-shift due to cerebral spinal fluid loss after neurosurgical procedure. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7494809/ /pubmed/33013651 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00987 Text en Copyright © 2020 Reitz, Luger, Lapa, Eibach, Filmann, Seifert, Weise, Klein, Kang, Baudrexel and Quick-Weller. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Reitz, Sarah C.
Luger, Sebastian
Lapa, Sriramya
Eibach, Michael
Filmann, Natalie
Seifert, Volker
Weise, Lutz
Klein, Johannes C.
Kang, Jun-Suk
Baudrexel, Simon
Quick-Weller, Johanna
Comparing Programming Sessions of Vim-DBS
title Comparing Programming Sessions of Vim-DBS
title_full Comparing Programming Sessions of Vim-DBS
title_fullStr Comparing Programming Sessions of Vim-DBS
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Programming Sessions of Vim-DBS
title_short Comparing Programming Sessions of Vim-DBS
title_sort comparing programming sessions of vim-dbs
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7494809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33013651
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00987
work_keys_str_mv AT reitzsarahc comparingprogrammingsessionsofvimdbs
AT lugersebastian comparingprogrammingsessionsofvimdbs
AT lapasriramya comparingprogrammingsessionsofvimdbs
AT eibachmichael comparingprogrammingsessionsofvimdbs
AT filmannnatalie comparingprogrammingsessionsofvimdbs
AT seifertvolker comparingprogrammingsessionsofvimdbs
AT weiselutz comparingprogrammingsessionsofvimdbs
AT kleinjohannesc comparingprogrammingsessionsofvimdbs
AT kangjunsuk comparingprogrammingsessionsofvimdbs
AT baudrexelsimon comparingprogrammingsessionsofvimdbs
AT quickwellerjohanna comparingprogrammingsessionsofvimdbs