Cargando…
Difference Between Intentional and Reactive Movement in Side-Steps: Patterns of Temporal Structure and Force Exertion
Intentional and reactive movements are dissimilar in terms of execution time. Previous studies reported that reactive movements are faster than intentional movements (“Bohr’s law” or “Gunslinger effect”), however, these studies focused only on hand-reaching tasks, such as pressing buttons. No studie...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7495094/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33013564 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02186 |
_version_ | 1783582865814978560 |
---|---|
author | Wakatsuki, Tsubasa Yamada, Norimasa |
author_facet | Wakatsuki, Tsubasa Yamada, Norimasa |
author_sort | Wakatsuki, Tsubasa |
collection | PubMed |
description | Intentional and reactive movements are dissimilar in terms of execution time. Previous studies reported that reactive movements are faster than intentional movements (“Bohr’s law” or “Gunslinger effect”), however, these studies focused only on hand-reaching tasks, such as pressing buttons. No studies assessed whole-body movements involving movement of the center of mass (CoM). This movement is characterized by many degrees of freedom because it involves many joints and requires more force than the hand-reaching movement. In this study, we determined the differences in the patterns of temporal structure and force exertion to elucidate the mechanism of “Bohr’s law” in whole-body movement involving movement of the CoM. Ten participants performed a sidestepping task, which requires at least two steps: (1) an intentional movement, in which the movement started with the participants’ own timing; and (2) a reactive movement, in which the movement started the moment a light-emitting diode bulb in front of the participants lit up. We collected data on the ground reaction forces and coordinates of 20 body points. The time of movement onset was calculated and defined based on the ground reaction force, which has the earliest onset compared with velocity and position. The execution time was significantly shorter in the reactive movement condition than in the intentional movement condition (772 vs. 715 ms, p = 2.9 × 10(–4)). We confirmed that Bohr’s law was applicable not only in hand-reaching tasks but also in whole-body movement. Moreover, we identified three phases, including the velocity reversal phenomenon associated with the produced mechanism of Bohr’s law, and provided the temporal structure. The difference in the pattern of force exertion accompanying the two styles of motor planning with different accuracies was strongly associated with this motor characteristic. These findings may serve as important basic data to scientifically clarify the mechanism of complex physical tactics implemented in one-on-one dueling in various sports. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7495094 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74950942020-10-02 Difference Between Intentional and Reactive Movement in Side-Steps: Patterns of Temporal Structure and Force Exertion Wakatsuki, Tsubasa Yamada, Norimasa Front Psychol Psychology Intentional and reactive movements are dissimilar in terms of execution time. Previous studies reported that reactive movements are faster than intentional movements (“Bohr’s law” or “Gunslinger effect”), however, these studies focused only on hand-reaching tasks, such as pressing buttons. No studies assessed whole-body movements involving movement of the center of mass (CoM). This movement is characterized by many degrees of freedom because it involves many joints and requires more force than the hand-reaching movement. In this study, we determined the differences in the patterns of temporal structure and force exertion to elucidate the mechanism of “Bohr’s law” in whole-body movement involving movement of the CoM. Ten participants performed a sidestepping task, which requires at least two steps: (1) an intentional movement, in which the movement started with the participants’ own timing; and (2) a reactive movement, in which the movement started the moment a light-emitting diode bulb in front of the participants lit up. We collected data on the ground reaction forces and coordinates of 20 body points. The time of movement onset was calculated and defined based on the ground reaction force, which has the earliest onset compared with velocity and position. The execution time was significantly shorter in the reactive movement condition than in the intentional movement condition (772 vs. 715 ms, p = 2.9 × 10(–4)). We confirmed that Bohr’s law was applicable not only in hand-reaching tasks but also in whole-body movement. Moreover, we identified three phases, including the velocity reversal phenomenon associated with the produced mechanism of Bohr’s law, and provided the temporal structure. The difference in the pattern of force exertion accompanying the two styles of motor planning with different accuracies was strongly associated with this motor characteristic. These findings may serve as important basic data to scientifically clarify the mechanism of complex physical tactics implemented in one-on-one dueling in various sports. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7495094/ /pubmed/33013564 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02186 Text en Copyright © 2020 Wakatsuki and Yamada. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Wakatsuki, Tsubasa Yamada, Norimasa Difference Between Intentional and Reactive Movement in Side-Steps: Patterns of Temporal Structure and Force Exertion |
title | Difference Between Intentional and Reactive Movement in Side-Steps: Patterns of Temporal Structure and Force Exertion |
title_full | Difference Between Intentional and Reactive Movement in Side-Steps: Patterns of Temporal Structure and Force Exertion |
title_fullStr | Difference Between Intentional and Reactive Movement in Side-Steps: Patterns of Temporal Structure and Force Exertion |
title_full_unstemmed | Difference Between Intentional and Reactive Movement in Side-Steps: Patterns of Temporal Structure and Force Exertion |
title_short | Difference Between Intentional and Reactive Movement in Side-Steps: Patterns of Temporal Structure and Force Exertion |
title_sort | difference between intentional and reactive movement in side-steps: patterns of temporal structure and force exertion |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7495094/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33013564 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02186 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wakatsukitsubasa differencebetweenintentionalandreactivemovementinsidestepspatternsoftemporalstructureandforceexertion AT yamadanorimasa differencebetweenintentionalandreactivemovementinsidestepspatternsoftemporalstructureandforceexertion |