Cargando…
Expulsion rate of intrauterine device: mediate vs. immediate puerperium period
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the rate of expulsion of intrauterine device (IUD) inserted during the immediate and mediate puerperium. To evaluate whether the type of delivery is a predictor of expulsion of the IUD when inserted in the puerperium period. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a prospective observa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Galenos Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7495121/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32517434 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2020.2020.0037 |
_version_ | 1783582871822270464 |
---|---|
author | Hochmuller, Juliano Terra Lopes, Karina Souza Guazzelli, Cristina Aparecida Falbo Gomes, Mariana Kefalas Oliveira Júnior, Edward Araujo Peixoto, Alberto Borges |
author_facet | Hochmuller, Juliano Terra Lopes, Karina Souza Guazzelli, Cristina Aparecida Falbo Gomes, Mariana Kefalas Oliveira Júnior, Edward Araujo Peixoto, Alberto Borges |
author_sort | Hochmuller, Juliano Terra |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the rate of expulsion of intrauterine device (IUD) inserted during the immediate and mediate puerperium. To evaluate whether the type of delivery is a predictor of expulsion of the IUD when inserted in the puerperium period. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a prospective observational study. Patients whose IUD (TCU-380 copper) was placed during the puerperal period were divided in two groups according to the time of placement: immediate and mediate puerperium. The decision regarding the time of IUD insertion was made in a non-randomized manner. Analysis was performed using chi-square, Mann-Whitney U, and Spearman’s correlation tests and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The total rate of IUD expulsions was 28.8% (49/170). There was no significant association between the occurrence of expulsion and the timing of IUD insertion (immediate vs mediate puerperium; 26.6% vs 34.78%, p=0.296). Among patients experiencing expulsion, 79.6% (39/49) underwent insertion after vaginal delivery and 20.4% (10/49) during cesarean section (CS). The type of delivery was a significant predictor for IUD expulsion (p<0.0001). Vaginal delivery was fourfold more likely to be associated with IUD expulsion inserted in the puerperal period than CS (odds ratio: 4.23, 95% confidence interval: 1.94-9.25). There was no significant correlation between the period between IUD insertion and the diagnosis of expulsion in regard to number of pregnancies (r=-0.160, p=0.271) or gestational age at delivery (r=-0.058, p=0.939). CONCLUSION: Vaginal delivery was the most prevalent type of delivery in patients who underwent IUD insertion during the immediate and mediate puerperium. The risk of IUD expulsion after vaginal delivery was greater than CS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7495121 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Galenos Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74951212020-09-23 Expulsion rate of intrauterine device: mediate vs. immediate puerperium period Hochmuller, Juliano Terra Lopes, Karina Souza Guazzelli, Cristina Aparecida Falbo Gomes, Mariana Kefalas Oliveira Júnior, Edward Araujo Peixoto, Alberto Borges J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc Original Investigation OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the rate of expulsion of intrauterine device (IUD) inserted during the immediate and mediate puerperium. To evaluate whether the type of delivery is a predictor of expulsion of the IUD when inserted in the puerperium period. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a prospective observational study. Patients whose IUD (TCU-380 copper) was placed during the puerperal period were divided in two groups according to the time of placement: immediate and mediate puerperium. The decision regarding the time of IUD insertion was made in a non-randomized manner. Analysis was performed using chi-square, Mann-Whitney U, and Spearman’s correlation tests and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The total rate of IUD expulsions was 28.8% (49/170). There was no significant association between the occurrence of expulsion and the timing of IUD insertion (immediate vs mediate puerperium; 26.6% vs 34.78%, p=0.296). Among patients experiencing expulsion, 79.6% (39/49) underwent insertion after vaginal delivery and 20.4% (10/49) during cesarean section (CS). The type of delivery was a significant predictor for IUD expulsion (p<0.0001). Vaginal delivery was fourfold more likely to be associated with IUD expulsion inserted in the puerperal period than CS (odds ratio: 4.23, 95% confidence interval: 1.94-9.25). There was no significant correlation between the period between IUD insertion and the diagnosis of expulsion in regard to number of pregnancies (r=-0.160, p=0.271) or gestational age at delivery (r=-0.058, p=0.939). CONCLUSION: Vaginal delivery was the most prevalent type of delivery in patients who underwent IUD insertion during the immediate and mediate puerperium. The risk of IUD expulsion after vaginal delivery was greater than CS. Galenos Publishing 2020-09 2020-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7495121/ /pubmed/32517434 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2020.2020.0037 Text en © Copyright 2020 by the Turkish-German Gynecological Education and Research Foundation http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association published by Galenos Publishing House. |
spellingShingle | Original Investigation Hochmuller, Juliano Terra Lopes, Karina Souza Guazzelli, Cristina Aparecida Falbo Gomes, Mariana Kefalas Oliveira Júnior, Edward Araujo Peixoto, Alberto Borges Expulsion rate of intrauterine device: mediate vs. immediate puerperium period |
title | Expulsion rate of intrauterine device: mediate vs. immediate puerperium period |
title_full | Expulsion rate of intrauterine device: mediate vs. immediate puerperium period |
title_fullStr | Expulsion rate of intrauterine device: mediate vs. immediate puerperium period |
title_full_unstemmed | Expulsion rate of intrauterine device: mediate vs. immediate puerperium period |
title_short | Expulsion rate of intrauterine device: mediate vs. immediate puerperium period |
title_sort | expulsion rate of intrauterine device: mediate vs. immediate puerperium period |
topic | Original Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7495121/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32517434 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2020.2020.0037 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hochmullerjulianoterra expulsionrateofintrauterinedevicemediatevsimmediatepuerperiumperiod AT lopeskarinasouza expulsionrateofintrauterinedevicemediatevsimmediatepuerperiumperiod AT guazzellicristinaaparecidafalbo expulsionrateofintrauterinedevicemediatevsimmediatepuerperiumperiod AT gomesmarianakefalasoliveira expulsionrateofintrauterinedevicemediatevsimmediatepuerperiumperiod AT junioredwardaraujo expulsionrateofintrauterinedevicemediatevsimmediatepuerperiumperiod AT peixotoalbertoborges expulsionrateofintrauterinedevicemediatevsimmediatepuerperiumperiod |