Cargando…
A comparison of the risk of cesarean section in gestational diabetes mellitus patients supplemented antenatally with vitamin D containing supplements versus placebo: A systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blinded randomized controlled trials
The aim of this study was to study the role of vitamin D containing supplements in the risk of cesarean section (CS), a common complication in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) patients. An additional objective was to assess the risk of developing pre-eclampsia, preterm delivery, macrosomia, and p...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Galenos Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7495127/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32517428 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2020.2019.0164 |
_version_ | 1783582873276645376 |
---|---|
author | Saha, Sumanta Saha, Sujata |
author_facet | Saha, Sumanta Saha, Sujata |
author_sort | Saha, Sumanta |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study was to study the role of vitamin D containing supplements in the risk of cesarean section (CS), a common complication in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) patients. An additional objective was to assess the risk of developing pre-eclampsia, preterm delivery, macrosomia, and polyhydramnios in these participants. Various electronic databases were searched for double-blinded parallel-arm randomized controlled trials that reported the incidence of CS in adult, non-insulin treated GDM patients who received vitamin D and placebo in different treatment arms, respectively. Next, each eligible trial’s risk of bias was assessed, and the effects of the above interventions on the respective outcomes were compared meta-analytically across the trials. This review included five Iranian trials sourcing data from nearly 380 participants. The risk of bias in the trials was primarily low. In contrast to the placebo group, the risk of CS [risk ratio (RR): 0.61, p=0.002, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.44,0.83; I(2)=0%, p-value of Cochrane’s Q: 0.373) and macrosomia (RR: 0.31, p=0.006, 95% CI: 0.13,0.72; I(2)=0%, p-value of Cochrane’s Q: 0.935] was less in the vitamin D supplemented group. The remaining outcomes did not differ between the intervention groups. The antenatal use of vitamin D containing supplements in non-insulin treated GDM patients might reduce the risk of CS and macrosomia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7495127 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Galenos Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74951272020-09-23 A comparison of the risk of cesarean section in gestational diabetes mellitus patients supplemented antenatally with vitamin D containing supplements versus placebo: A systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blinded randomized controlled trials Saha, Sumanta Saha, Sujata J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc Review The aim of this study was to study the role of vitamin D containing supplements in the risk of cesarean section (CS), a common complication in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) patients. An additional objective was to assess the risk of developing pre-eclampsia, preterm delivery, macrosomia, and polyhydramnios in these participants. Various electronic databases were searched for double-blinded parallel-arm randomized controlled trials that reported the incidence of CS in adult, non-insulin treated GDM patients who received vitamin D and placebo in different treatment arms, respectively. Next, each eligible trial’s risk of bias was assessed, and the effects of the above interventions on the respective outcomes were compared meta-analytically across the trials. This review included five Iranian trials sourcing data from nearly 380 participants. The risk of bias in the trials was primarily low. In contrast to the placebo group, the risk of CS [risk ratio (RR): 0.61, p=0.002, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.44,0.83; I(2)=0%, p-value of Cochrane’s Q: 0.373) and macrosomia (RR: 0.31, p=0.006, 95% CI: 0.13,0.72; I(2)=0%, p-value of Cochrane’s Q: 0.935] was less in the vitamin D supplemented group. The remaining outcomes did not differ between the intervention groups. The antenatal use of vitamin D containing supplements in non-insulin treated GDM patients might reduce the risk of CS and macrosomia. Galenos Publishing 2020-09 2020-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7495127/ /pubmed/32517428 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2020.2019.0164 Text en © Copyright 2020 by the Turkish-German Gynecological Education and Research Foundation http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association published by Galenos Publishing House. |
spellingShingle | Review Saha, Sumanta Saha, Sujata A comparison of the risk of cesarean section in gestational diabetes mellitus patients supplemented antenatally with vitamin D containing supplements versus placebo: A systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blinded randomized controlled trials |
title | A comparison of the risk of cesarean section in gestational diabetes mellitus patients supplemented antenatally with vitamin D containing supplements versus placebo: A systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blinded randomized controlled trials |
title_full | A comparison of the risk of cesarean section in gestational diabetes mellitus patients supplemented antenatally with vitamin D containing supplements versus placebo: A systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blinded randomized controlled trials |
title_fullStr | A comparison of the risk of cesarean section in gestational diabetes mellitus patients supplemented antenatally with vitamin D containing supplements versus placebo: A systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blinded randomized controlled trials |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of the risk of cesarean section in gestational diabetes mellitus patients supplemented antenatally with vitamin D containing supplements versus placebo: A systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blinded randomized controlled trials |
title_short | A comparison of the risk of cesarean section in gestational diabetes mellitus patients supplemented antenatally with vitamin D containing supplements versus placebo: A systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blinded randomized controlled trials |
title_sort | comparison of the risk of cesarean section in gestational diabetes mellitus patients supplemented antenatally with vitamin d containing supplements versus placebo: a systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blinded randomized controlled trials |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7495127/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32517428 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2020.2019.0164 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sahasumanta acomparisonoftheriskofcesareansectioningestationaldiabetesmellituspatientssupplementedantenatallywithvitamindcontainingsupplementsversusplaceboasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT sahasujata acomparisonoftheriskofcesareansectioningestationaldiabetesmellituspatientssupplementedantenatallywithvitamindcontainingsupplementsversusplaceboasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT sahasumanta comparisonoftheriskofcesareansectioningestationaldiabetesmellituspatientssupplementedantenatallywithvitamindcontainingsupplementsversusplaceboasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT sahasujata comparisonoftheriskofcesareansectioningestationaldiabetesmellituspatientssupplementedantenatallywithvitamindcontainingsupplementsversusplaceboasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrials |