Cargando…

A comparison of the risk of cesarean section in gestational diabetes mellitus patients supplemented antenatally with vitamin D containing supplements versus placebo: A systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blinded randomized controlled trials

The aim of this study was to study the role of vitamin D containing supplements in the risk of cesarean section (CS), a common complication in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) patients. An additional objective was to assess the risk of developing pre-eclampsia, preterm delivery, macrosomia, and p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saha, Sumanta, Saha, Sujata
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Galenos Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7495127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32517428
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2020.2019.0164
_version_ 1783582873276645376
author Saha, Sumanta
Saha, Sujata
author_facet Saha, Sumanta
Saha, Sujata
author_sort Saha, Sumanta
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to study the role of vitamin D containing supplements in the risk of cesarean section (CS), a common complication in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) patients. An additional objective was to assess the risk of developing pre-eclampsia, preterm delivery, macrosomia, and polyhydramnios in these participants. Various electronic databases were searched for double-blinded parallel-arm randomized controlled trials that reported the incidence of CS in adult, non-insulin treated GDM patients who received vitamin D and placebo in different treatment arms, respectively. Next, each eligible trial’s risk of bias was assessed, and the effects of the above interventions on the respective outcomes were compared meta-analytically across the trials. This review included five Iranian trials sourcing data from nearly 380 participants. The risk of bias in the trials was primarily low. In contrast to the placebo group, the risk of CS [risk ratio (RR): 0.61, p=0.002, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.44,0.83; I(2)=0%, p-value of Cochrane’s Q: 0.373) and macrosomia (RR: 0.31, p=0.006, 95% CI: 0.13,0.72; I(2)=0%, p-value of Cochrane’s Q: 0.935] was less in the vitamin D supplemented group. The remaining outcomes did not differ between the intervention groups. The antenatal use of vitamin D containing supplements in non-insulin treated GDM patients might reduce the risk of CS and macrosomia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7495127
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Galenos Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74951272020-09-23 A comparison of the risk of cesarean section in gestational diabetes mellitus patients supplemented antenatally with vitamin D containing supplements versus placebo: A systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blinded randomized controlled trials Saha, Sumanta Saha, Sujata J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc Review The aim of this study was to study the role of vitamin D containing supplements in the risk of cesarean section (CS), a common complication in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) patients. An additional objective was to assess the risk of developing pre-eclampsia, preterm delivery, macrosomia, and polyhydramnios in these participants. Various electronic databases were searched for double-blinded parallel-arm randomized controlled trials that reported the incidence of CS in adult, non-insulin treated GDM patients who received vitamin D and placebo in different treatment arms, respectively. Next, each eligible trial’s risk of bias was assessed, and the effects of the above interventions on the respective outcomes were compared meta-analytically across the trials. This review included five Iranian trials sourcing data from nearly 380 participants. The risk of bias in the trials was primarily low. In contrast to the placebo group, the risk of CS [risk ratio (RR): 0.61, p=0.002, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.44,0.83; I(2)=0%, p-value of Cochrane’s Q: 0.373) and macrosomia (RR: 0.31, p=0.006, 95% CI: 0.13,0.72; I(2)=0%, p-value of Cochrane’s Q: 0.935] was less in the vitamin D supplemented group. The remaining outcomes did not differ between the intervention groups. The antenatal use of vitamin D containing supplements in non-insulin treated GDM patients might reduce the risk of CS and macrosomia. Galenos Publishing 2020-09 2020-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7495127/ /pubmed/32517428 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2020.2019.0164 Text en © Copyright 2020 by the Turkish-German Gynecological Education and Research Foundation http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association published by Galenos Publishing House.
spellingShingle Review
Saha, Sumanta
Saha, Sujata
A comparison of the risk of cesarean section in gestational diabetes mellitus patients supplemented antenatally with vitamin D containing supplements versus placebo: A systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blinded randomized controlled trials
title A comparison of the risk of cesarean section in gestational diabetes mellitus patients supplemented antenatally with vitamin D containing supplements versus placebo: A systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blinded randomized controlled trials
title_full A comparison of the risk of cesarean section in gestational diabetes mellitus patients supplemented antenatally with vitamin D containing supplements versus placebo: A systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blinded randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr A comparison of the risk of cesarean section in gestational diabetes mellitus patients supplemented antenatally with vitamin D containing supplements versus placebo: A systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blinded randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of the risk of cesarean section in gestational diabetes mellitus patients supplemented antenatally with vitamin D containing supplements versus placebo: A systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blinded randomized controlled trials
title_short A comparison of the risk of cesarean section in gestational diabetes mellitus patients supplemented antenatally with vitamin D containing supplements versus placebo: A systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blinded randomized controlled trials
title_sort comparison of the risk of cesarean section in gestational diabetes mellitus patients supplemented antenatally with vitamin d containing supplements versus placebo: a systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blinded randomized controlled trials
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7495127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32517428
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2020.2019.0164
work_keys_str_mv AT sahasumanta acomparisonoftheriskofcesareansectioningestationaldiabetesmellituspatientssupplementedantenatallywithvitamindcontainingsupplementsversusplaceboasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT sahasujata acomparisonoftheriskofcesareansectioningestationaldiabetesmellituspatientssupplementedantenatallywithvitamindcontainingsupplementsversusplaceboasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT sahasumanta comparisonoftheriskofcesareansectioningestationaldiabetesmellituspatientssupplementedantenatallywithvitamindcontainingsupplementsversusplaceboasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT sahasujata comparisonoftheriskofcesareansectioningestationaldiabetesmellituspatientssupplementedantenatallywithvitamindcontainingsupplementsversusplaceboasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdoubleblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrials