Cargando…
An In Vitro Pilot Study Comparing the Novel HemoClear Gravity-Driven Microfiltration Cell Salvage System with the Conventional Centrifugal XTRA™ Autotransfusion Device
BACKGROUND: In 2013, the World Health Organization reported a shortage of 17 million red blood cell units, a number that remains growing. Acts to relieve this shortage have primarily focused on allogeneic blood collection. Nevertheless, autologous transfusion can partially alleviate the current pres...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7495155/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32963523 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/9584186 |
_version_ | 1783582879852265472 |
---|---|
author | Hoetink, Anneloes Scherphof, Sabine F. Mooi, Frederik J. Westers, Paul van Dijk, Jack van de Leur, Sjef J. Nierich, Arno P. |
author_facet | Hoetink, Anneloes Scherphof, Sabine F. Mooi, Frederik J. Westers, Paul van Dijk, Jack van de Leur, Sjef J. Nierich, Arno P. |
author_sort | Hoetink, Anneloes |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In 2013, the World Health Organization reported a shortage of 17 million red blood cell units, a number that remains growing. Acts to relieve this shortage have primarily focused on allogeneic blood collection. Nevertheless, autologous transfusion can partially alleviate the current pressure and dependence on blood banking systems. To achieve this, current gold standard autotransfusion devices should be complemented with widely available, cost-efficient, and time-efficient devices. The novel HemoClear cell salvage device (HemoClear BV, Zwolle, Netherlands), a gravity-driven microfilter, potentially is widely employable. We evaluated its performance in the cardiac postoperative setting compared to the centrifugal XTRA™ autotransfusion device. METHODS: In a split-unit study (n = 18), shed blood collected 18 hours after cardiothoracic surgery was divided into two equal volumes. One-half was processed by the XTRA™ device and the other with the HemoClear blood separation system. In this paired set-up, equal washing volumes were used for both methods. Washing effectivity and cellular recovery were determined by measuring of complete blood count, free hemoglobin, complement C3, complement C4, and D-dimer in both concentrate as filtrate. Also, processing times and volumes were evaluated. RESULTS: The HemoClear and XTRA™ devices showed equal effectiveness in concentrating erythrocytes and leucocytes. Both methods reduced complement C3, complement C4, and D-dimer by ≥90%. The centrifugal device reduced solutes more significantly by up to 99%. Free hemoglobin load was reduced to 12.9% and 15.5% by the XTRA™ and HemoClear, respectively. CONCLUSION: The HemoClear device effectively produced washed concentrated red blood cells comparably to the conventional centrifugal XTRA™ autotransfusion device. Although the centrifugal XTRA™ device achieved a significantly higher reduction in contaminants, the HemoClear device achieved acceptable blood quality and seems promising in settings where gold standard cell savers are unaffordable or unpractical. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7495155 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74951552020-09-21 An In Vitro Pilot Study Comparing the Novel HemoClear Gravity-Driven Microfiltration Cell Salvage System with the Conventional Centrifugal XTRA™ Autotransfusion Device Hoetink, Anneloes Scherphof, Sabine F. Mooi, Frederik J. Westers, Paul van Dijk, Jack van de Leur, Sjef J. Nierich, Arno P. Anesthesiol Res Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: In 2013, the World Health Organization reported a shortage of 17 million red blood cell units, a number that remains growing. Acts to relieve this shortage have primarily focused on allogeneic blood collection. Nevertheless, autologous transfusion can partially alleviate the current pressure and dependence on blood banking systems. To achieve this, current gold standard autotransfusion devices should be complemented with widely available, cost-efficient, and time-efficient devices. The novel HemoClear cell salvage device (HemoClear BV, Zwolle, Netherlands), a gravity-driven microfilter, potentially is widely employable. We evaluated its performance in the cardiac postoperative setting compared to the centrifugal XTRA™ autotransfusion device. METHODS: In a split-unit study (n = 18), shed blood collected 18 hours after cardiothoracic surgery was divided into two equal volumes. One-half was processed by the XTRA™ device and the other with the HemoClear blood separation system. In this paired set-up, equal washing volumes were used for both methods. Washing effectivity and cellular recovery were determined by measuring of complete blood count, free hemoglobin, complement C3, complement C4, and D-dimer in both concentrate as filtrate. Also, processing times and volumes were evaluated. RESULTS: The HemoClear and XTRA™ devices showed equal effectiveness in concentrating erythrocytes and leucocytes. Both methods reduced complement C3, complement C4, and D-dimer by ≥90%. The centrifugal device reduced solutes more significantly by up to 99%. Free hemoglobin load was reduced to 12.9% and 15.5% by the XTRA™ and HemoClear, respectively. CONCLUSION: The HemoClear device effectively produced washed concentrated red blood cells comparably to the conventional centrifugal XTRA™ autotransfusion device. Although the centrifugal XTRA™ device achieved a significantly higher reduction in contaminants, the HemoClear device achieved acceptable blood quality and seems promising in settings where gold standard cell savers are unaffordable or unpractical. Hindawi 2020-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7495155/ /pubmed/32963523 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/9584186 Text en Copyright © 2020 Anneloes Hoetink et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hoetink, Anneloes Scherphof, Sabine F. Mooi, Frederik J. Westers, Paul van Dijk, Jack van de Leur, Sjef J. Nierich, Arno P. An In Vitro Pilot Study Comparing the Novel HemoClear Gravity-Driven Microfiltration Cell Salvage System with the Conventional Centrifugal XTRA™ Autotransfusion Device |
title | An In Vitro Pilot Study Comparing the Novel HemoClear Gravity-Driven Microfiltration Cell Salvage System with the Conventional Centrifugal XTRA™ Autotransfusion Device |
title_full | An In Vitro Pilot Study Comparing the Novel HemoClear Gravity-Driven Microfiltration Cell Salvage System with the Conventional Centrifugal XTRA™ Autotransfusion Device |
title_fullStr | An In Vitro Pilot Study Comparing the Novel HemoClear Gravity-Driven Microfiltration Cell Salvage System with the Conventional Centrifugal XTRA™ Autotransfusion Device |
title_full_unstemmed | An In Vitro Pilot Study Comparing the Novel HemoClear Gravity-Driven Microfiltration Cell Salvage System with the Conventional Centrifugal XTRA™ Autotransfusion Device |
title_short | An In Vitro Pilot Study Comparing the Novel HemoClear Gravity-Driven Microfiltration Cell Salvage System with the Conventional Centrifugal XTRA™ Autotransfusion Device |
title_sort | in vitro pilot study comparing the novel hemoclear gravity-driven microfiltration cell salvage system with the conventional centrifugal xtra™ autotransfusion device |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7495155/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32963523 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/9584186 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hoetinkanneloes aninvitropilotstudycomparingthenovelhemocleargravitydrivenmicrofiltrationcellsalvagesystemwiththeconventionalcentrifugalxtraautotransfusiondevice AT scherphofsabinef aninvitropilotstudycomparingthenovelhemocleargravitydrivenmicrofiltrationcellsalvagesystemwiththeconventionalcentrifugalxtraautotransfusiondevice AT mooifrederikj aninvitropilotstudycomparingthenovelhemocleargravitydrivenmicrofiltrationcellsalvagesystemwiththeconventionalcentrifugalxtraautotransfusiondevice AT westerspaul aninvitropilotstudycomparingthenovelhemocleargravitydrivenmicrofiltrationcellsalvagesystemwiththeconventionalcentrifugalxtraautotransfusiondevice AT vandijkjack aninvitropilotstudycomparingthenovelhemocleargravitydrivenmicrofiltrationcellsalvagesystemwiththeconventionalcentrifugalxtraautotransfusiondevice AT vandeleursjefj aninvitropilotstudycomparingthenovelhemocleargravitydrivenmicrofiltrationcellsalvagesystemwiththeconventionalcentrifugalxtraautotransfusiondevice AT niericharnop aninvitropilotstudycomparingthenovelhemocleargravitydrivenmicrofiltrationcellsalvagesystemwiththeconventionalcentrifugalxtraautotransfusiondevice AT hoetinkanneloes invitropilotstudycomparingthenovelhemocleargravitydrivenmicrofiltrationcellsalvagesystemwiththeconventionalcentrifugalxtraautotransfusiondevice AT scherphofsabinef invitropilotstudycomparingthenovelhemocleargravitydrivenmicrofiltrationcellsalvagesystemwiththeconventionalcentrifugalxtraautotransfusiondevice AT mooifrederikj invitropilotstudycomparingthenovelhemocleargravitydrivenmicrofiltrationcellsalvagesystemwiththeconventionalcentrifugalxtraautotransfusiondevice AT westerspaul invitropilotstudycomparingthenovelhemocleargravitydrivenmicrofiltrationcellsalvagesystemwiththeconventionalcentrifugalxtraautotransfusiondevice AT vandijkjack invitropilotstudycomparingthenovelhemocleargravitydrivenmicrofiltrationcellsalvagesystemwiththeconventionalcentrifugalxtraautotransfusiondevice AT vandeleursjefj invitropilotstudycomparingthenovelhemocleargravitydrivenmicrofiltrationcellsalvagesystemwiththeconventionalcentrifugalxtraautotransfusiondevice AT niericharnop invitropilotstudycomparingthenovelhemocleargravitydrivenmicrofiltrationcellsalvagesystemwiththeconventionalcentrifugalxtraautotransfusiondevice |