Cargando…
A Retrospective Analysis of Gender-Based Difference in Adherence to Influenza Vaccination during the 2018-2019 Season
INTRODUCTION: Improving flu vaccination rates in the general population is an important and effective strategy toward reducing morbidity, mortality, and the cost of seasonal influenza. In order to optimize immunization strategies, factors associated with decreased vaccination rates need to be explor...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7495515/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32930035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2150132720958532 |
_version_ | 1783582938181402624 |
---|---|
author | Applewhite, Andres Stancampiano, Fernando F. Harris, Dana M. Manaois, Alyssa Dimuna, John Glenn, Jada Heckman, Michael G. Brushaber, Danielle E. Sher, Taimur Valery, Jose Raul |
author_facet | Applewhite, Andres Stancampiano, Fernando F. Harris, Dana M. Manaois, Alyssa Dimuna, John Glenn, Jada Heckman, Michael G. Brushaber, Danielle E. Sher, Taimur Valery, Jose Raul |
author_sort | Applewhite, Andres |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Improving flu vaccination rates in the general population is an important and effective strategy toward reducing morbidity, mortality, and the cost of seasonal influenza. In order to optimize immunization strategies, factors associated with decreased vaccination rates need to be explored. The literature suggests that there is a gender difference in the rate of influenza vaccination but is limited to population-based survey studies and also is inconsistent as to which gender has a higher rate of vaccination. The purpose of this study was to evaluate for a gender-based difference in the rate of influenza vaccination among patients who presented for an annual physical examination during the 2018 to 2019 influenza season. METHODS: In this multi-site, retrospective chart review, a total of 1193 patients (608 female and 585 male) who underwent an annual physical examination in April of 2019 were included. Baseline medical information was collected, as well as demographic characteristics and influenza vaccination status. The proportion of patients who underwent influenza vaccination was compared between males and females using multivariable logistic regression models; odds ratios (ORs) were estimated. RESULTS: The likelihood of influenza vaccination was significantly higher in females (62.8%) compared to males (53.2%) in both unadjusted analysis (OR = 1.49, P < .001) and in multivariable analysis adjusting for the potential confounding influences of clinic location, BMI, insurance type, and occupation (OR = 1.42, P = .005). Interestingly, a higher influenza vaccination rate for females compared to males was observed in patients age<60 years (OR = 1.70, P = .025) and between ages 60 and 75 (OR = 1.66, P = .009), but not for patients older than 75 years (OR = 1.12, P = .66). CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that the rate of influenza vaccination is higher for females than for males who presented for an annual preventive physical exam and who are younger than 75 years old. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7495515 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74955152020-09-23 A Retrospective Analysis of Gender-Based Difference in Adherence to Influenza Vaccination during the 2018-2019 Season Applewhite, Andres Stancampiano, Fernando F. Harris, Dana M. Manaois, Alyssa Dimuna, John Glenn, Jada Heckman, Michael G. Brushaber, Danielle E. Sher, Taimur Valery, Jose Raul J Prim Care Community Health Original Research INTRODUCTION: Improving flu vaccination rates in the general population is an important and effective strategy toward reducing morbidity, mortality, and the cost of seasonal influenza. In order to optimize immunization strategies, factors associated with decreased vaccination rates need to be explored. The literature suggests that there is a gender difference in the rate of influenza vaccination but is limited to population-based survey studies and also is inconsistent as to which gender has a higher rate of vaccination. The purpose of this study was to evaluate for a gender-based difference in the rate of influenza vaccination among patients who presented for an annual physical examination during the 2018 to 2019 influenza season. METHODS: In this multi-site, retrospective chart review, a total of 1193 patients (608 female and 585 male) who underwent an annual physical examination in April of 2019 were included. Baseline medical information was collected, as well as demographic characteristics and influenza vaccination status. The proportion of patients who underwent influenza vaccination was compared between males and females using multivariable logistic regression models; odds ratios (ORs) were estimated. RESULTS: The likelihood of influenza vaccination was significantly higher in females (62.8%) compared to males (53.2%) in both unadjusted analysis (OR = 1.49, P < .001) and in multivariable analysis adjusting for the potential confounding influences of clinic location, BMI, insurance type, and occupation (OR = 1.42, P = .005). Interestingly, a higher influenza vaccination rate for females compared to males was observed in patients age<60 years (OR = 1.70, P = .025) and between ages 60 and 75 (OR = 1.66, P = .009), but not for patients older than 75 years (OR = 1.12, P = .66). CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that the rate of influenza vaccination is higher for females than for males who presented for an annual preventive physical exam and who are younger than 75 years old. SAGE Publications 2020-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7495515/ /pubmed/32930035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2150132720958532 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Applewhite, Andres Stancampiano, Fernando F. Harris, Dana M. Manaois, Alyssa Dimuna, John Glenn, Jada Heckman, Michael G. Brushaber, Danielle E. Sher, Taimur Valery, Jose Raul A Retrospective Analysis of Gender-Based Difference in Adherence to Influenza Vaccination during the 2018-2019 Season |
title | A Retrospective Analysis of Gender-Based Difference in Adherence to
Influenza Vaccination during the 2018-2019 Season |
title_full | A Retrospective Analysis of Gender-Based Difference in Adherence to
Influenza Vaccination during the 2018-2019 Season |
title_fullStr | A Retrospective Analysis of Gender-Based Difference in Adherence to
Influenza Vaccination during the 2018-2019 Season |
title_full_unstemmed | A Retrospective Analysis of Gender-Based Difference in Adherence to
Influenza Vaccination during the 2018-2019 Season |
title_short | A Retrospective Analysis of Gender-Based Difference in Adherence to
Influenza Vaccination during the 2018-2019 Season |
title_sort | retrospective analysis of gender-based difference in adherence to
influenza vaccination during the 2018-2019 season |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7495515/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32930035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2150132720958532 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT applewhiteandres aretrospectiveanalysisofgenderbaseddifferenceinadherencetoinfluenzavaccinationduringthe20182019season AT stancampianofernandof aretrospectiveanalysisofgenderbaseddifferenceinadherencetoinfluenzavaccinationduringthe20182019season AT harrisdanam aretrospectiveanalysisofgenderbaseddifferenceinadherencetoinfluenzavaccinationduringthe20182019season AT manaoisalyssa aretrospectiveanalysisofgenderbaseddifferenceinadherencetoinfluenzavaccinationduringthe20182019season AT dimunajohn aretrospectiveanalysisofgenderbaseddifferenceinadherencetoinfluenzavaccinationduringthe20182019season AT glennjada aretrospectiveanalysisofgenderbaseddifferenceinadherencetoinfluenzavaccinationduringthe20182019season AT heckmanmichaelg aretrospectiveanalysisofgenderbaseddifferenceinadherencetoinfluenzavaccinationduringthe20182019season AT brushaberdaniellee aretrospectiveanalysisofgenderbaseddifferenceinadherencetoinfluenzavaccinationduringthe20182019season AT shertaimur aretrospectiveanalysisofgenderbaseddifferenceinadherencetoinfluenzavaccinationduringthe20182019season AT valeryjoseraul aretrospectiveanalysisofgenderbaseddifferenceinadherencetoinfluenzavaccinationduringthe20182019season AT applewhiteandres retrospectiveanalysisofgenderbaseddifferenceinadherencetoinfluenzavaccinationduringthe20182019season AT stancampianofernandof retrospectiveanalysisofgenderbaseddifferenceinadherencetoinfluenzavaccinationduringthe20182019season AT harrisdanam retrospectiveanalysisofgenderbaseddifferenceinadherencetoinfluenzavaccinationduringthe20182019season AT manaoisalyssa retrospectiveanalysisofgenderbaseddifferenceinadherencetoinfluenzavaccinationduringthe20182019season AT dimunajohn retrospectiveanalysisofgenderbaseddifferenceinadherencetoinfluenzavaccinationduringthe20182019season AT glennjada retrospectiveanalysisofgenderbaseddifferenceinadherencetoinfluenzavaccinationduringthe20182019season AT heckmanmichaelg retrospectiveanalysisofgenderbaseddifferenceinadherencetoinfluenzavaccinationduringthe20182019season AT brushaberdaniellee retrospectiveanalysisofgenderbaseddifferenceinadherencetoinfluenzavaccinationduringthe20182019season AT shertaimur retrospectiveanalysisofgenderbaseddifferenceinadherencetoinfluenzavaccinationduringthe20182019season AT valeryjoseraul retrospectiveanalysisofgenderbaseddifferenceinadherencetoinfluenzavaccinationduringthe20182019season |