Cargando…
No Differences in Clinical Outcomes of Suture Tape Augmented Repair Versus Broström Repair Surgery for Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability
BACKGROUND: Suture tape (ST) augmented repair, an alternative to traditional Broström repair (BR), may protect the repaired anterior talofibular ligament during ligament healing. No systematic review of cohort studies has been conducted to compare traditional BR with ST-augmented repair for chronic...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7495671/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32974410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120948491 |
_version_ | 1783582941198155776 |
---|---|
author | Li, Hong Zhao, Yujie Chen, Wenbo Li, Hongyun Hua, Yinghui |
author_facet | Li, Hong Zhao, Yujie Chen, Wenbo Li, Hongyun Hua, Yinghui |
author_sort | Li, Hong |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Suture tape (ST) augmented repair, an alternative to traditional Broström repair (BR), may protect the repaired anterior talofibular ligament during ligament healing. No systematic review of cohort studies has been conducted to compare traditional BR with ST-augmented repair for chronic lateral ankle instability. PURPOSE: To review the current evidence in the literature to ascertain whether ST-augmented repair is superior to traditional BR in managing chronic lateral ankle instability. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A literature search was performed to identify relevant articles published in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The search included cohort studies comparing the efficacy of BR and ST-augmented repair procedures in terms of incidence of instability recurrence, functional scores, talar tilt angle (TTA), anterior talar translation (ATT), and complication rate. Methodological quality was assessed using the Jadad scale for randomized studies and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for nonrandomized studies. RESULTS: A total of 4 clinical trials with 254 patients were included. No significant differences were detected between BR and ST-augmented repair procedures in terms of incidence of recurrent instability, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society score, Foot and Ankle Outcome Score, Foot and Ankle Ability Measure, TTA, ATT, or complication rate. The ST group appeared to have a shorter operation time compared with the BR group. CONCLUSION: No significant differences were found between ST-augmented repair and BR surgery regarding incidence of recurrent instability, functional outcome scores, or complication rates. Although technically challenging, the ST-augmented repair procedure appears to be a safe and fast option. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7495671 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74956712020-09-23 No Differences in Clinical Outcomes of Suture Tape Augmented Repair Versus Broström Repair Surgery for Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability Li, Hong Zhao, Yujie Chen, Wenbo Li, Hongyun Hua, Yinghui Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Suture tape (ST) augmented repair, an alternative to traditional Broström repair (BR), may protect the repaired anterior talofibular ligament during ligament healing. No systematic review of cohort studies has been conducted to compare traditional BR with ST-augmented repair for chronic lateral ankle instability. PURPOSE: To review the current evidence in the literature to ascertain whether ST-augmented repair is superior to traditional BR in managing chronic lateral ankle instability. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A literature search was performed to identify relevant articles published in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The search included cohort studies comparing the efficacy of BR and ST-augmented repair procedures in terms of incidence of instability recurrence, functional scores, talar tilt angle (TTA), anterior talar translation (ATT), and complication rate. Methodological quality was assessed using the Jadad scale for randomized studies and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for nonrandomized studies. RESULTS: A total of 4 clinical trials with 254 patients were included. No significant differences were detected between BR and ST-augmented repair procedures in terms of incidence of recurrent instability, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society score, Foot and Ankle Outcome Score, Foot and Ankle Ability Measure, TTA, ATT, or complication rate. The ST group appeared to have a shorter operation time compared with the BR group. CONCLUSION: No significant differences were found between ST-augmented repair and BR surgery regarding incidence of recurrent instability, functional outcome scores, or complication rates. Although technically challenging, the ST-augmented repair procedure appears to be a safe and fast option. SAGE Publications 2020-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7495671/ /pubmed/32974410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120948491 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Article Li, Hong Zhao, Yujie Chen, Wenbo Li, Hongyun Hua, Yinghui No Differences in Clinical Outcomes of Suture Tape Augmented Repair Versus Broström Repair Surgery for Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability |
title | No Differences in Clinical Outcomes of Suture Tape Augmented Repair
Versus Broström Repair Surgery for Chronic Lateral Ankle
Instability |
title_full | No Differences in Clinical Outcomes of Suture Tape Augmented Repair
Versus Broström Repair Surgery for Chronic Lateral Ankle
Instability |
title_fullStr | No Differences in Clinical Outcomes of Suture Tape Augmented Repair
Versus Broström Repair Surgery for Chronic Lateral Ankle
Instability |
title_full_unstemmed | No Differences in Clinical Outcomes of Suture Tape Augmented Repair
Versus Broström Repair Surgery for Chronic Lateral Ankle
Instability |
title_short | No Differences in Clinical Outcomes of Suture Tape Augmented Repair
Versus Broström Repair Surgery for Chronic Lateral Ankle
Instability |
title_sort | no differences in clinical outcomes of suture tape augmented repair
versus broström repair surgery for chronic lateral ankle
instability |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7495671/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32974410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120948491 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lihong nodifferencesinclinicaloutcomesofsuturetapeaugmentedrepairversusbrostromrepairsurgeryforchroniclateralankleinstability AT zhaoyujie nodifferencesinclinicaloutcomesofsuturetapeaugmentedrepairversusbrostromrepairsurgeryforchroniclateralankleinstability AT chenwenbo nodifferencesinclinicaloutcomesofsuturetapeaugmentedrepairversusbrostromrepairsurgeryforchroniclateralankleinstability AT lihongyun nodifferencesinclinicaloutcomesofsuturetapeaugmentedrepairversusbrostromrepairsurgeryforchroniclateralankleinstability AT huayinghui nodifferencesinclinicaloutcomesofsuturetapeaugmentedrepairversusbrostromrepairsurgeryforchroniclateralankleinstability |