Cargando…

No Differences in Clinical Outcomes of Suture Tape Augmented Repair Versus Broström Repair Surgery for Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability

BACKGROUND: Suture tape (ST) augmented repair, an alternative to traditional Broström repair (BR), may protect the repaired anterior talofibular ligament during ligament healing. No systematic review of cohort studies has been conducted to compare traditional BR with ST-augmented repair for chronic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Hong, Zhao, Yujie, Chen, Wenbo, Li, Hongyun, Hua, Yinghui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7495671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32974410
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120948491
_version_ 1783582941198155776
author Li, Hong
Zhao, Yujie
Chen, Wenbo
Li, Hongyun
Hua, Yinghui
author_facet Li, Hong
Zhao, Yujie
Chen, Wenbo
Li, Hongyun
Hua, Yinghui
author_sort Li, Hong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Suture tape (ST) augmented repair, an alternative to traditional Broström repair (BR), may protect the repaired anterior talofibular ligament during ligament healing. No systematic review of cohort studies has been conducted to compare traditional BR with ST-augmented repair for chronic lateral ankle instability. PURPOSE: To review the current evidence in the literature to ascertain whether ST-augmented repair is superior to traditional BR in managing chronic lateral ankle instability. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A literature search was performed to identify relevant articles published in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The search included cohort studies comparing the efficacy of BR and ST-augmented repair procedures in terms of incidence of instability recurrence, functional scores, talar tilt angle (TTA), anterior talar translation (ATT), and complication rate. Methodological quality was assessed using the Jadad scale for randomized studies and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for nonrandomized studies. RESULTS: A total of 4 clinical trials with 254 patients were included. No significant differences were detected between BR and ST-augmented repair procedures in terms of incidence of recurrent instability, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society score, Foot and Ankle Outcome Score, Foot and Ankle Ability Measure, TTA, ATT, or complication rate. The ST group appeared to have a shorter operation time compared with the BR group. CONCLUSION: No significant differences were found between ST-augmented repair and BR surgery regarding incidence of recurrent instability, functional outcome scores, or complication rates. Although technically challenging, the ST-augmented repair procedure appears to be a safe and fast option.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7495671
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74956712020-09-23 No Differences in Clinical Outcomes of Suture Tape Augmented Repair Versus Broström Repair Surgery for Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability Li, Hong Zhao, Yujie Chen, Wenbo Li, Hongyun Hua, Yinghui Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Suture tape (ST) augmented repair, an alternative to traditional Broström repair (BR), may protect the repaired anterior talofibular ligament during ligament healing. No systematic review of cohort studies has been conducted to compare traditional BR with ST-augmented repair for chronic lateral ankle instability. PURPOSE: To review the current evidence in the literature to ascertain whether ST-augmented repair is superior to traditional BR in managing chronic lateral ankle instability. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A literature search was performed to identify relevant articles published in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The search included cohort studies comparing the efficacy of BR and ST-augmented repair procedures in terms of incidence of instability recurrence, functional scores, talar tilt angle (TTA), anterior talar translation (ATT), and complication rate. Methodological quality was assessed using the Jadad scale for randomized studies and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for nonrandomized studies. RESULTS: A total of 4 clinical trials with 254 patients were included. No significant differences were detected between BR and ST-augmented repair procedures in terms of incidence of recurrent instability, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society score, Foot and Ankle Outcome Score, Foot and Ankle Ability Measure, TTA, ATT, or complication rate. The ST group appeared to have a shorter operation time compared with the BR group. CONCLUSION: No significant differences were found between ST-augmented repair and BR surgery regarding incidence of recurrent instability, functional outcome scores, or complication rates. Although technically challenging, the ST-augmented repair procedure appears to be a safe and fast option. SAGE Publications 2020-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7495671/ /pubmed/32974410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120948491 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Li, Hong
Zhao, Yujie
Chen, Wenbo
Li, Hongyun
Hua, Yinghui
No Differences in Clinical Outcomes of Suture Tape Augmented Repair Versus Broström Repair Surgery for Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability
title No Differences in Clinical Outcomes of Suture Tape Augmented Repair Versus Broström Repair Surgery for Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability
title_full No Differences in Clinical Outcomes of Suture Tape Augmented Repair Versus Broström Repair Surgery for Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability
title_fullStr No Differences in Clinical Outcomes of Suture Tape Augmented Repair Versus Broström Repair Surgery for Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability
title_full_unstemmed No Differences in Clinical Outcomes of Suture Tape Augmented Repair Versus Broström Repair Surgery for Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability
title_short No Differences in Clinical Outcomes of Suture Tape Augmented Repair Versus Broström Repair Surgery for Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability
title_sort no differences in clinical outcomes of suture tape augmented repair versus broström repair surgery for chronic lateral ankle instability
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7495671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32974410
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120948491
work_keys_str_mv AT lihong nodifferencesinclinicaloutcomesofsuturetapeaugmentedrepairversusbrostromrepairsurgeryforchroniclateralankleinstability
AT zhaoyujie nodifferencesinclinicaloutcomesofsuturetapeaugmentedrepairversusbrostromrepairsurgeryforchroniclateralankleinstability
AT chenwenbo nodifferencesinclinicaloutcomesofsuturetapeaugmentedrepairversusbrostromrepairsurgeryforchroniclateralankleinstability
AT lihongyun nodifferencesinclinicaloutcomesofsuturetapeaugmentedrepairversusbrostromrepairsurgeryforchroniclateralankleinstability
AT huayinghui nodifferencesinclinicaloutcomesofsuturetapeaugmentedrepairversusbrostromrepairsurgeryforchroniclateralankleinstability